가정폭력범죄 대응방안에 대한 재고찰 = Problems and Improvements of the Measures against Domestic Violence

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Domestic violence is not merely a violence, but a violent crime such as murder. Therefore, it is required to examine whether the current ‘Special Acts on Domestic Violence’ is effective for the prevention of domestic violence crime, especially the prevention of the risk of domestic violence leading to serious crimes such as murder.
If you look at the response to domestic violence in Germany, Switzerland and Austria, it is our top priority to protect victims. In particular, the recent increase in the risk of developing domestic violence as a felony crime, such as murder, protects the victim by actively engaging in civil and early intervention to prevent the development of domestic violence as a felony. In the case of Germany, it recognizes that there is a limit to the criminal legal action, and it is evaluated that it is establishing domestic violence policy by civil legal action.
Therefore, it is necessary to consider victim protection as the top priority of the response policy against domestic violence. It is necessary to review the viewpoint of responding to domestic violence focusing on victim protection through civil early intervention. If the result of attempted homicide by domestic violence crime occurs, it is necessary to actively and urgently protect the victim. Domestic violence that caused the result of attempted murder is not subject to protection, but it is necessary to include the murder of domestic violence crime in order to actively implement the protection measures for the victim.
The current ‘Special Acts on Domestic Violence’ focuses primarily on physical violence and does not include economic violence, such as not giving a spouse a living allowance. Therefore, it is necessary to consider adding the contents of fulfillment of obligation to support or payment of a family allowance to victim protection order.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이승호, "형사사법의 담론과 법원운용의 시스템" 한국형사정책연구원 20 (20): 807-832, 2009

2 김은경, "현행 가정폭력처벌특례법의 운용실태 및 입법적 개선방안 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2014

3 김은경, "피해자 관점에서 본 가정폭력특례법의 실효성과 한계" 한국피해자학회 10 (10): 67-103, 2002

4 이재희, "치료형사사법의 새로운 시도" 2016

5 김동현, "인지과학적 관점에서 바라본 자유의지와형사책임론의 문제" 법학연구소 51 (51): 269-315, 2010

6 김혜정, "유럽의 가정폭력범죄 대응정책에 관한 검토" 한국피해자학회 23 (23): 127-152, 2015

7 정현미, "가정폭력특례법의 문제점과 개정방향" 법학연구소 17 (17): 137-160, 2012

8 권양희, "가정폭력처벌법의 실무상 문제점" 2017

9 김영진, "가정폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법의 개정 방향" 법학연구소 27 (27): 401-425, 2016

10 박소현, "가정폭력규제입법에 대한 비교법적 검토" 한국의정연구회 8 (8): 209-234, 2013

11 오세연, "가정폭력 상습성의 원인과 대응방안에 관한 연구" 한국중독범죄학회 1 (1): 82-105, 2011

12 김재민, "가정폭력 관련 특별법 체계의 개선방향" 한국피해자학회 21 (21): 43-61, 2013

13 Bundeskriminalamt, "Partnerschaftsgewalt Kriminalstatistische Auswertung - Berichtsjahr 2016" 2017

14 Keller, "Häusliche Gewalt und Gewaltschutzgesetz" Richard Boorberg Verlag GmbH 2008

15 Haller, "Gewalt gegen Frauen “High-Risk Victims" Bundesministerin für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst im Bundeskanzleramt Österreich 2012

16 김혜정, "2014 정책연구용역" 법원행정처 2014

17 Reber, "10 Jahre polizeiliche Massnahmen gegen häusliche Gewalt im Kanton St.Gllen" Kanton St.Gallen Koordinationsstelle häusliche Gewalt 2013