RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      우치무라 간조의 속죄론 연구 = The Redemption Theory of Uzimura Kanzo

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100492095

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Uzimura Kanzo who was grown up in a pantheist world converted into Chistianity that he understood as a monotheism. As a Christian he had struggled to achieve the salvation through completing his morality, ending up to realize that as a human being he ...

      Uzimura Kanzo who was grown up in a pantheist world converted into Chistianity that he understood as a monotheism. As a Christian he had struggled to achieve the salvation through completing his morality, ending up to realize that as a human being he was not deserved to be saved without grace. After all, he accepted the doctrine that the redemption from sins could be achieved not by a work but by a faith as ‘the Truth.’ Based on such process of his thinking and practicing, he had developed his redemptive faith and redemption theory in his book, Gu An Rok(求安錄: meaning a record of salvation and peace). He argued for the undeserved-ness of human beings and divine initiative for the salvation and expanded his notion of salvation into generalized salvation for all humanity, based on his own theory of ‘atonement redemption’. For him, salvation was not the matter of human beings. He also argues for ‘objective grace’, meaning no one could be escape from the love of God. Such his thought could be interpreted into the statement of his faith that he, ‘a sinner of sinneres’, had been saved. Uzimura, in his redemption theory, argued that the justice and love of God was not dualistic but united on the cross of Jesus Christ. He said that as for the relationship of salvation and morality, the latter was not the precondition for the former, but had to be the consequence of it, enabling to maintain the balance between the divine heteronomy and human autonomy.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Uzimura Kanzo who was grown up in a pantheist world converted into Chistianity that he understood as a monotheism. As a Christian he had struggled to achieve the salvation through completing his morality, ending up to realize that as a human being he ...

      Uzimura Kanzo who was grown up in a pantheist world converted into Chistianity that he understood as a monotheism. As a Christian he had struggled to achieve the salvation through completing his morality, ending up to realize that as a human being he was not deserved to be saved without grace. After all, he accepted the doctrine that the redemption from sins could be achieved not by a work but by a faith as ‘the Truth.’ Based on such process of his thinking and practicing, he had developed his redemptive faith and redemption theory in his book, Gu An Rok(求安錄: meaning a record of salvation and peace). He argued for the undeserved-ness of human beings and divine initiative for the salvation and expanded his notion of salvation into generalized salvation for all humanity, based on his own theory of ‘atonement redemption’. For him, salvation was not the matter of human beings. He also argues for ‘objective grace’, meaning no one could be escape from the love of God. Such his thought could be interpreted into the statement of his faith that he, ‘a sinner of sinneres’, had been saved. Uzimura, in his redemption theory, argued that the justice and love of God was not dualistic but united on the cross of Jesus Christ. He said that as for the relationship of salvation and morality, the latter was not the precondition for the former, but had to be the consequence of it, enabling to maintain the balance between the divine heteronomy and human autonomy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가면서
      • Ⅱ. 기독교에의 입신
      • Ⅲ. 신신학(新神學) 논쟁과 『구안론(求安錄)』의 집필
      • Ⅳ. 우치무라의 속죄론의 특징
      • Ⅴ. 결론을 대신하여
      • Ⅰ. 들어가면서
      • Ⅱ. 기독교에의 입신
      • Ⅲ. 신신학(新神學) 논쟁과 『구안론(求安錄)』의 집필
      • Ⅳ. 우치무라의 속죄론의 특징
      • Ⅴ. 결론을 대신하여
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양현혜, "함석헌과 무교회의 역사철학" 연세대학교 신과대학 연합신학대학원 71 : 135-168, 2013

      2 양현혜, "함석헌과 內村鑑三의 두 개의 ‘J’" 30 (30): 47-69,

      3 鈴木貴子, "한일 간에 있어서 內村鑑三 연구의 차이" 13 (13): 165-188,

      4 양현혜, "일본 무교회운동과 그 신학" 한국일본사상사학회 (21) : 127-157, 2011

      5 우치무라 간조, "우치무라간조 회심기" 홍성사 2008

      6 정응수, "우치무라 간조의 전쟁관의 변천" 15 (15): 2939-,

      7 이후천, "우치무라 간조의 전도 이해" 58 (58): 209-231,

      8 양현혜, "우치무라 간조의 비전론과 무교회 2세대" 63 (63): 231-255,

      9 스즈끼기꾸꼬, "우치무라 간조의 ‘불경사건’― 고난과의 조우를 통해서 ―" 한국종교학회 통권 (통권): 317-344, 2007

      10 鈴木貴子, "우치무라 간조에서 본 내셔날리즘과 코스모폴리터니즘" 11 (11): 95-122,

      1 양현혜, "함석헌과 무교회의 역사철학" 연세대학교 신과대학 연합신학대학원 71 : 135-168, 2013

      2 양현혜, "함석헌과 內村鑑三의 두 개의 ‘J’" 30 (30): 47-69,

      3 鈴木貴子, "한일 간에 있어서 內村鑑三 연구의 차이" 13 (13): 165-188,

      4 양현혜, "일본 무교회운동과 그 신학" 한국일본사상사학회 (21) : 127-157, 2011

      5 우치무라 간조, "우치무라간조 회심기" 홍성사 2008

      6 정응수, "우치무라 간조의 전쟁관의 변천" 15 (15): 2939-,

      7 이후천, "우치무라 간조의 전도 이해" 58 (58): 209-231,

      8 양현혜, "우치무라 간조의 비전론과 무교회 2세대" 63 (63): 231-255,

      9 스즈끼기꾸꼬, "우치무라 간조의 ‘불경사건’― 고난과의 조우를 통해서 ―" 한국종교학회 통권 (통권): 317-344, 2007

      10 鈴木貴子, "우치무라 간조에서 본 내셔날리즘과 코스모폴리터니즘" 11 (11): 95-122,

      11 우치무라 간조, "우치무라 간조 전집 3권" 크리스챤서적 2000

      12 우치무라 간조, "우치무라 간조 전집 1권" 크리스챤서적 2000

      13 鈴木範久, "우치무라 간조" 소화출판사 1995

      14 이노우에 가쓰오, "막말유신" 어문학사 2006

      15 양현혜, "김교신의 민족적 아이덴티티와 內村鑑三" 1 (1): 244-256, 1996

      16 야가사키 히데노리, "근대일본정치사상에 나타난 이상과 현실: 일본의 과오와 교훈" 한국국제정치학회 44 (44): 167-187, 2004

      17 澁谷浩, "若き内村の罪意識" (21) :

      18 內村鑑三, "戰場ヶ原に友人と語る" 16 :

      19 丸山眞男, "忠誠と反逆" 築摩書房 1992

      20 田中彭, "小國主義" 岩波書店 1999

      21 ゾンターク․ミラ, "大正期日本における合理主義と救濟: 1918-1919年の再臨待望運動の‘厚い記述’" 東京大學校大學院 2008

      22 黑川知文, "内村鑑三と再臨運動" 新敎出版社 2012

      23 윤복희, "內村鑑三의 천연(天然)관" 84 (84): 297-309,

      24 박상도, "內村鑑三의 재림사상" 70 (70): 135-168,

      25 內村鑑三, "內村鑑三著作集" 岩波書店 1982

      26 徳田幸雄, "內村鑑三の回心過程とその本質" (34) :

      27 谷沢英知, "內村鑑三の回心の研究" (27) :

      28 李慶愛, "內村鑑三のキリスト敎思想: 贖罪論と終末論を中心として" 九州大學出版會 2003

      29 鈴木範久, "內村鑑三とその時代" 日本基督敎敎團 1975

      30 宮田光雄, "キリスト敎思想史硏究" 創文社 2008

      31 內村鑑三, "たまたま贖罪について" 23 :

      32 Chiba Shin, "Living for Jesus and Japan: the social and theological thought of Uchimura Kanzo" William B. Eermans Publishing Company 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.34 0.34 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.33 0.816 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼