정중법을 이용한 빗장 아래 상완 신경총 차단 환자에서의 0.5% Levobupivacaine과 0.5% Ropivacaine의 비교 = Comparison of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: We performed a prospective, double blind study to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block produced by 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery.
Methods: We included 60 patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed via the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine. We observed which nerve type was stimulated and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of block was assessed intraoperatively. The duration of sensory and motor block and complications were assessed.
Results: There were no significant differences in frequencies of stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or success of block. There were no significant difference in duration of sensory block, but duration of motor block was prolonged after 0.5% levobupivacaine. There were no complications.
Conclusions: Both 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine had similar effects in the vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: We performed a prospective, double blind study to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block produced by 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery.
Methods: We included 60 patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed via the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine. We observed which nerve type was stimulated and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of block was assessed intraoperatively. The duration of sensory and motor block and complications were assessed.
Results: There were no significant differences in frequencies of stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or success of block. There were no significant difference in duration of sensory block, but duration of motor block was prolonged after 0.5% levobupivacaine. There were no complications.
Conclusions: Both 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine had similar effects in the vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 황성미, "상완신경총차단시 Ropivacaine에 첨가된Fentanyl과 Epinephrine의 영향" 대한마취과학회 47 (47): 655-659, 2004

2 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes" 90 : 944-950, 1999

3 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 99 : 1354-1358, 2003

4 Neal JM, "Quantitative analysis of respiratory, motor, and sensory function after supraclavicular block" 86 : 1239-1244, 1998

5 Urmey WF, "One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography" 72 : 498-503, 1991

6 Rodriguez J, "Median versus musculocutaneous nerve response with single-injection infraclavicular coracoid block" 29 : 534-538, 2004

7 Piangatelli C, "Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in the infraclavicular brachial plexus block" 72 : 217-221, 2006

8 Kapral S, "Lateral infraclavicular plexus block vs. axillary block for hand and forearm surgery" 43 : 1047-1052, 1999

9 Casati A, "Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: a randomized, double-blinded comparison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine" 96 : 253-259, 2003

10 Kilka HG, "Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade. A new method for anesthesia of the upper extremity. An anatomical and clinical study" 44 : 339-344, 1995

11 Wilson JL, "Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique" 87 : 870-873, 1998

12 Raj PP, "Infraclavicular brachial plexus block--a new approach" 52 : 897-904, 1973

13 Rodriguez J, "Infraclavicular brachial plexus block effects on respiratory function and extent of the block" 23 : 564-568, 1998

14 Jandard C, "Infraclavicular block with lateral approach and nerve stimulation: extent of anesthesia and adverse effects" 27 : 37-42, 2002

15 Liisanantti O, "High-dose bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in axillary brachial plexus block" 48 : 601-606, 2004

16 Bloc S, "Efficiency of secondary posterior trunk single stimulation, low volume infraclavicular plexus block for upper limb surgery" 24 : 1329-1333, 2005

17 Whiffler K, "Coracoid block--a safe and easy technique" 53 : 845-848, 1981

18 Cox CR, "Comparison of S(−)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block" 80 : 594-598, 1998

19 Neuburger M, "Biometric data on risk of pneumothorax from vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A magnetic resonance imaging study" 50 : 511-516, 2001

20 Borgeat A, "An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique" 93 : 436-441, 2001

21 Rettig HC, "A comparison of the vertical infraclavicular and axillary approaches for brachial plexus anaesthesia" 49 : 1501-1508, 2005

22 Hickey R, "A comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% for brachial plexus block" 74 : 639-642, 1991