RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      독일 민주주의의 실험과 정착: 바이마르Weimar 공화국과 본Bonn 공화국의 의회민주주의 = Experiment and Consolidation of German Democracy: Parliamentary Democracy of Weimar Republic and Bonn Republic

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103965026

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      While the parliamentary democracy introduced by the Weimar Republic has generally been perceived as the precursor of the totalitarian regime which replaced it, the one introduced by West Germany (Bonn Republic) has usually been evaluated as a consolidated democracy. However, unlike what occurred under the Weimar Republic, the West German parliamentary democracy, which focused more on these curing of political stability than on the principles of democracy, exhibited a tendency to limit the dynamic characteristics of parliamentary democracy. With this in mind, the claim that the West German parliamentary democracy was more successful than that of the Weimar Republic should be reassessed. All political systems naturally pursue the attainment of political stability. However, if a dictatorship can be regarded as a more stable political system than democracy, then any analysis based solely on the concept of political stability and continuity which evaluates the Weimar Republic as a failure and the West German regime as a success is one that overlook the detailed characteristics of the parliamentary democracies introduced by the two republics. The Weimar Republic allowed a variety of political factions to join the parliament, introduced elements related to direct democracy elements such as referendums and national initiatives to take root. Meanwhile, the West German experiment with democracy was one that was oriented towards the pursuit of stability during the post-war occupation.
      The 5% paragraph greatly complicated minority parties’ ability to enter the legislature of the Bonn Republic. Moreover, West German democracy was also characterized by such features as limits on the freedom of expression, on the grounds that this was needed to protect democracy; bans on the establishment if non-democratic political parties; and the exclusion of elements related to a direct democracy. However, in the end, the dynamic democracy of the Weimar Republic began to overlook the fact that respect for diversity was only possible under a democratic system and eventually came to regard democracy as a process that had lost its purpose. Meanwhile, West Germany was able to successfully consolidate its democratic system by accepting the fact that the values pursued by the political community should be placed ahead of democracy and that the achievement of these values was possible through the democratic process.
      번역하기

      While the parliamentary democracy introduced by the Weimar Republic has generally been perceived as the precursor of the totalitarian regime which replaced it, the one introduced by West Germany (Bonn Republic) has usually been evaluated as a consolid...

      While the parliamentary democracy introduced by the Weimar Republic has generally been perceived as the precursor of the totalitarian regime which replaced it, the one introduced by West Germany (Bonn Republic) has usually been evaluated as a consolidated democracy. However, unlike what occurred under the Weimar Republic, the West German parliamentary democracy, which focused more on these curing of political stability than on the principles of democracy, exhibited a tendency to limit the dynamic characteristics of parliamentary democracy. With this in mind, the claim that the West German parliamentary democracy was more successful than that of the Weimar Republic should be reassessed. All political systems naturally pursue the attainment of political stability. However, if a dictatorship can be regarded as a more stable political system than democracy, then any analysis based solely on the concept of political stability and continuity which evaluates the Weimar Republic as a failure and the West German regime as a success is one that overlook the detailed characteristics of the parliamentary democracies introduced by the two republics. The Weimar Republic allowed a variety of political factions to join the parliament, introduced elements related to direct democracy elements such as referendums and national initiatives to take root. Meanwhile, the West German experiment with democracy was one that was oriented towards the pursuit of stability during the post-war occupation.
      The 5% paragraph greatly complicated minority parties’ ability to enter the legislature of the Bonn Republic. Moreover, West German democracy was also characterized by such features as limits on the freedom of expression, on the grounds that this was needed to protect democracy; bans on the establishment if non-democratic political parties; and the exclusion of elements related to a direct democracy. However, in the end, the dynamic democracy of the Weimar Republic began to overlook the fact that respect for diversity was only possible under a democratic system and eventually came to regard democracy as a process that had lost its purpose. Meanwhile, West Germany was able to successfully consolidate its democratic system by accepting the fact that the values pursued by the political community should be placed ahead of democracy and that the achievement of these values was possible through the democratic process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "바이마르 시대의 극우주의 운동 바이마르 공화국-격동의 역사" 2002

      2 "바이마르 공화국-격동의 역사" 2002

      3 "바이마르 공화국 헌법" 1999

      4 "독일기본법상 민주주의원리의 규범적 기능 공법연구" 2001

      5 "독일 바이마르 공화국의 국가건설사상 연방제와 의회민주주의 원칙" 2003

      6 "김학이 옮김 분열과 통일의 독일사" 2000

      7 "“Internationale Rahmenbedingungen einer demokratischen Neuordung in Deutschland 1918/19" 19871988dieweimarerrepublik1918-1933

      8 "“Die Sozialpolitik in der Weimarer Republik" 19881988dieweimarerrepublik1918-1933

      9 "“Demokratie und Machtvakuum zum Problem des Parteienstaats in der Auflösung der Weimarer Republik" 109-134, 19841984

      10 "“Das Scheitern der Weimarer Republik als Problem der Forschung" 19841984

      1 "바이마르 시대의 극우주의 운동 바이마르 공화국-격동의 역사" 2002

      2 "바이마르 공화국-격동의 역사" 2002

      3 "바이마르 공화국 헌법" 1999

      4 "독일기본법상 민주주의원리의 규범적 기능 공법연구" 2001

      5 "독일 바이마르 공화국의 국가건설사상 연방제와 의회민주주의 원칙" 2003

      6 "김학이 옮김 분열과 통일의 독일사" 2000

      7 "“Internationale Rahmenbedingungen einer demokratischen Neuordung in Deutschland 1918/19" 19871988dieweimarerrepublik1918-1933

      8 "“Die Sozialpolitik in der Weimarer Republik" 19881988dieweimarerrepublik1918-1933

      9 "“Demokratie und Machtvakuum zum Problem des Parteienstaats in der Auflösung der Weimarer Republik" 109-134, 19841984

      10 "“Das Scheitern der Weimarer Republik als Problem der Forschung" 19841984

      11 "Vorgeschichte und Geschichte 1945-1983" 1985

      12 "Vom Frankenreich bis zur Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands" 2001

      13 "Sein historischer Hintergrund und seie politische Funktion" 19801980

      14 "Regierungsführung von Konrad Adenauer bis Gerhard Schröder" 2004

      15 "Politische Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland" 2000

      16 "Parteien in der Weimarer Republik" 19881988dieweimarerrepublik1918-1933

      17 "Grundzüge des politischen Systems Deutschlands" 2004

      18 "Geschichte und Problematik des Parlamentarismus" 1983

      19 "Die Weimarer Republik" 2000

      20 "Die Weimaerrepublik" 1999

      21 "Die Umkehr. Deutsche Wandlungen 1945-1995" 2004

      22 "Die Geschichte der ersten deutschen Demokratie" 1998

      23 "Der deutsche Sozialstaat" 2003

      24 "Der Zusammenbruch der Monarchie und die Entstehung der Weimarer Republik" 1988dieweimarerrepublik1918-1933

      25 "Der Weg zum Grundgesetz" 1998

      26 "Der Verfassungstext und die lebenden Verfassungen" 1999

      27 "Der Sozialstaat" 2004

      28 "Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik" 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼