RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      와해성 혁신과정에서 핵심기술과 비즈니스 모델간의 관계와 보완기술의 중요성 분석: 인터넷 쇼핑몰 사례를 중심으로 = An Analysis on the Role of Enabling Technology in the Relationship between Core Technology and Business Model during the Process of Disruptive Innovation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104214047

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In his highly cited book, Innovator’s Dilemma (1997), Christensen introduced a notion of disruptive technology that is based on the observations from disk-drive industry and used it as an explanatory variable through which new entrants outperform incumbents in the industry. In explaining his later observations of disruptive innovations in other industries, however, his early theory based on disruptive technology has been applied to all cases without careful distinction between the notions of technology and business model (Markides, 2006). Furthermore, it has been criticized that his model suffers from lack of enough explanatory power and other important factors that are necessary to fully explain the observed phenomena in various cases (Danneels, 2004).
      Motivated by the critics in literature, the current study carefully distinguishes between innovation of technology and innovation of business model in the process of disruptive innovation, and apply our framework to the case of internet shopping mall business.
      Our study yields two main results. First, the internet-related business model which Christensen argued as an example of disruptive innovation is accomplished through two distinctive and separable growth phases: a period of technology growth and a period of business model growth. Second, in the process of disruptive innovation, the notion of enabling technology plays an important bridging role that connects core technology and business model. Furthermore, we confirm that the success of business model innovation depends on the degree of maturity of the enabling technologies. In conclusion,Christensen’s notion of disruptive innovation can be further detailed in terms of technology innovation and business model innovation, and if there exist enabling technologies, the chance of success of the business model is higher when the enabling technology is matured rather than when the core technology is merely acknowledged as a disruptive technology.
      번역하기

      In his highly cited book, Innovator’s Dilemma (1997), Christensen introduced a notion of disruptive technology that is based on the observations from disk-drive industry and used it as an explanatory variable through which new entrants outperform in...

      In his highly cited book, Innovator’s Dilemma (1997), Christensen introduced a notion of disruptive technology that is based on the observations from disk-drive industry and used it as an explanatory variable through which new entrants outperform incumbents in the industry. In explaining his later observations of disruptive innovations in other industries, however, his early theory based on disruptive technology has been applied to all cases without careful distinction between the notions of technology and business model (Markides, 2006). Furthermore, it has been criticized that his model suffers from lack of enough explanatory power and other important factors that are necessary to fully explain the observed phenomena in various cases (Danneels, 2004).
      Motivated by the critics in literature, the current study carefully distinguishes between innovation of technology and innovation of business model in the process of disruptive innovation, and apply our framework to the case of internet shopping mall business.
      Our study yields two main results. First, the internet-related business model which Christensen argued as an example of disruptive innovation is accomplished through two distinctive and separable growth phases: a period of technology growth and a period of business model growth. Second, in the process of disruptive innovation, the notion of enabling technology plays an important bridging role that connects core technology and business model. Furthermore, we confirm that the success of business model innovation depends on the degree of maturity of the enabling technologies. In conclusion,Christensen’s notion of disruptive innovation can be further detailed in terms of technology innovation and business model innovation, and if there exist enabling technologies, the chance of success of the business model is higher when the enabling technology is matured rather than when the core technology is merely acknowledged as a disruptive technology.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 문화일보, "해커 전자상거래발전발목불법금전인출우려네티즌이용꺼려"

      2 이호근, "한국 전자상거래 시장에 대한 진단과 시장성장에 기여한 고유 특성에 대한 분석: 인터넷 쇼핑몰 시장을 중심으로" 한국정보화진흥원 14 (14): 60-81, 2007

      3 김선량, "전자상거래시 소비자정보탐색과 소비자만족에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 20 (20): 95-107, 2002

      4 한국일보, "전자상거래결제시스템128비트급국내첫개발"

      5 내일신문, "인터넷쇼핑몰현황"

      6 전병헌, "인터넷비즈니스현황분석및모델연구 일반정책연구지정공모사업" 정보통신학회 2001

      7 김구성, "인터넷 쇼핑에서 모 기업의 신뢰가 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 신뢰와 구매의도에 미치는 영향- 구매경험자와 탐색경험자 비교연구 -" 한국유통학회 9 (9): 85-114, 2004

      8 윤명길, "기술혁신의산업적인한계전자상거래의전개패턴을중심으로" 2 (2): 187-200, 1999

      9 Brown,S, "Using Daily Stock Returns:The Case of Event Studies" (14) : 3-32, 1985

      10 Govindarajan,V, "The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Marketing Ex Ante Predictions" 23 (23): 12-18, 2006

      1 문화일보, "해커 전자상거래발전발목불법금전인출우려네티즌이용꺼려"

      2 이호근, "한국 전자상거래 시장에 대한 진단과 시장성장에 기여한 고유 특성에 대한 분석: 인터넷 쇼핑몰 시장을 중심으로" 한국정보화진흥원 14 (14): 60-81, 2007

      3 김선량, "전자상거래시 소비자정보탐색과 소비자만족에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 20 (20): 95-107, 2002

      4 한국일보, "전자상거래결제시스템128비트급국내첫개발"

      5 내일신문, "인터넷쇼핑몰현황"

      6 전병헌, "인터넷비즈니스현황분석및모델연구 일반정책연구지정공모사업" 정보통신학회 2001

      7 김구성, "인터넷 쇼핑에서 모 기업의 신뢰가 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 신뢰와 구매의도에 미치는 영향- 구매경험자와 탐색경험자 비교연구 -" 한국유통학회 9 (9): 85-114, 2004

      8 윤명길, "기술혁신의산업적인한계전자상거래의전개패턴을중심으로" 2 (2): 187-200, 1999

      9 Brown,S, "Using Daily Stock Returns:The Case of Event Studies" (14) : 3-32, 1985

      10 Govindarajan,V, "The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Marketing Ex Ante Predictions" 23 (23): 12-18, 2006

      11 Christensen,C.M, "The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption" 23 (23): 39-55, 2006

      12 Henderson,R, "The Innovator’s Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence" 23 (23): 5-11, 2006

      13 Christensen,C.M, "The Innovator’s Dilemma" Harvard Business School Press 1997

      14 Christensen,C.M, "The Innovation’s Solution Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth" Harvard Business School Press 2003

      15 Slater,S.F, "Successful Development and Commercialization of Technological Innovation:Insights Based on Strategy Typeof Product Innovation Management" 23 (23): 26-33, 2006

      16 Zhang,D, "Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium:An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology" 5 (5): 1387-3326, 2004

      17 Christensen,C.M, "Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change" Harvard Business Review 67-76, 2000

      18 Brown,S, "Measuring Security Price Performance" 8 : 205-258, 1980

      19 Steele,B.C.H, "Material Science and Engineering:The Enabling Technology for the Commercialisation of Fuel Cell Systems" 36 : 1053-1068, 2001

      20 Culnan,M.J, "Information Privacy Concerns,Procedural Fairness,and Impersonal Trust:An Empirical Investigation" 10 (10): 104-115, 1999

      21 Christensen,C.M, "Exploring the Limits of the Technology S-curve.Part I:Component Technology" 1 (1): 334-357, 1992

      22 Govindarajan,V, "Disruptiveness of Innovations:Measurement and an Assessment of Reliability and Validity" 27 (27): 189-199, 2005

      23 Tellis,G.J, "Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leaderships" 23 (23): 34-38, 2006

      24 Danneels,E, "Disruptive Technology Reconsidered:A Critique and Research Agenda" 22 (22): 246-258, 2004

      25 Markides,C, "Disruptive Innovation:In Need of Better Theory" 23 (23): 19-25, 2006

      26 Christensen,C.M, "Customer Power,Strategic Investment,and the Failure of Leading Firm" 17 (17): 197-218, 1996

      27 Timmers,P, "Business Models for Electronic Markets" 8 (8): 3-8, 1998

      28 Laudon,J.P, "Business Information System" 2007

      29 한국정보보호진흥원, "2007년 국내 민간부문 해킹ㆍ바이러스 통계분석" 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 기슬혁신연구 -> 기술혁신연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.88
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.92 1.204 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼