소비자중재에서 소비자보호의 문제 = The Consumer Protection in Consumer Arbitration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

These days, arbitration actively is used in many areas as the most effective dispute settlement scheme alternating trial of the court. In Korea, consumer arbitration has not yet revitalized, but due to many merits arbitration system has such as promptness of dispute settlement, flexibility of procedure, tendency to use arbitration as alternative dispute resolution in consumer dispute will gain strength in the future. In the face of revitalization movement of consumer arbitration, it is required to examine consumer protection in consumer arbitration. The protection considering specific circumstance of consumer who is not used to business relations is required in consumer arbitration. However, it is unnecessary to exclude the protection from arbitration subject of consumer dispute or do the protection through limitations on the time or method of arbitration agreement, since these will obstruct revitalization of consumer arbitration. Consumer protection in consumer arbitration has to be done through imposition of duty to offer accurate information to consumer. Also, it is desirable for consumer protection to be achieved in preventive level, and post-governance arbitration like application for setting aside award to court due to conflict with the ordre public should be avoided.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김석철, "소비자 피해구제 실태분석을 통한 소비자 중재제도 도입방안 연구" 한국중재학회 12 (12): 207-239, 2002

2 김석철, "소비자 피해구제 실태분석을 통한 소비자 중재제도 도입방안 연구" 한국중재학회 12 (12): 207-239, 2002

3 목영준, "상사중재법론" 42-, 2000

4 김상일, "미국의 소비자중재에 관한 판례의 최근동향" 한국비교사법학회 9 (9): -33, 2002

5 "독일은 증권거래법(WpHG Gesetz über den Wertpapierhandel)"

6 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구" 28-, 2007

7 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구" 220-, 2007

8 Linda Demaine, "“Volunteering” To Arbitrate Through Predispute Arbitration Clauses: The Average Consumer's Experience" 67 (67): 2004

9 "http://www.citizen.org/Press/pr-arb1.htm"

10 "http://www.citizen.org/Press/pr-arb1.htm"

11 "http://www.adr.org"

12 "http:// www.bbb.org/alerts/arb.asp"

13 "Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427 (1953)"

14 강병근, "UNCITRAL모델중재법의 개정 ―제39차 유엔국제무역법위원회 본회의를 중심으로" 17 : 23-, 2006

15 Jarvin, "Schwedisches und deutsches Schiedsverfahrensrecht im Vergleich, In Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21th Century" 319-, 2001

16 Mäsch, "Schiedsvereinbarungen mit Verbrauchern, In FS für Schlosser" 532-, 2005

17 Schwab, "Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 7. Aufl" 5-, 2005

18 "Münchner Kommentar ZPO, Bd. 3" 1059-, 1992

19 Wells, "Mandatory arbitration clauses have consumers signing away the right to sue"

20 Smith, "Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: Consumer Protection and the Circumvention of the Judicial System" 50 (50): 2001

21 Heymann, "Der ordre public in der privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit" 183-, 1969

22 Weihe, "Der Schutz der Verbraucher im Recht der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit" 3-, 2005

23 Glossner, "Das Schiedsgericht in der Praxis, 4. Aufl" 93-, 2000

24 Schlosser, "Das Recht des internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 2. Aufl" 308-, 1989

25 "Consumer Credit Fair Dispute Resolution Act" 2001

26 Sternlight, "Consumer Arbitration, In Arbitration Law in America" 131-, 2006

27 Sternlight, "Consumer Arbitration, In Arbitration Law in America" 138-, 2006

28 "Commission Recommendation 98/257"

29 "Budnitz"

30 Raeschke-Kessler, "Binnenmarkt, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und ordre public" 149-, 1990

31 "BGH NJW"

32 Budnitz, "Arbitration of Disputes Between Consumers and Financial Institutions: A Serious Threat to Consumer Protection" 10 (10): 1995

33 Tweeddale, "Arbitration of Commercial Disputes" 594-, 2005

34 "Allied-Bruce Terminex Companies, Inc. v. Dobson, 513 U.S.26 5 (1995)"

35 "Alexander v. Anthony Crane Int'l, 341 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2003)"