<옹고집전>에 드러난 악(惡)의 성격 연구 - 성리학적 관점을 중심으로 = A Study on the Character of Evil Revealed in <Ong-Gojib-Jeon>

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, I examined the character of “evil” revealed in <Ong- Gojib-Jeon> from the point of “Seong-li-hag(性理學)”. After defining the characteristics in detail, the implications for understanding classic novels were discussed. In addition, this study attempted to examine the shape of “evil,” embodied by classic novels, exemplify it, and explain why it is not extreme evil. Seonglihag claimed absolute goodness and denied the existence of absolute evil. Therefore, it can be considered a perspective that explains why absolute wickedness does not appear in classic novels. With this premise, the subject of the study was <Ong-Gojib-Jeon>, where the main character’s evil deeds emerged as the key events of the novel. Because of the discussion, evil in seong- li-hag refers to a heart lacking goodness, a heart lacking in(仁), a heart lacking gyeong(敬), a heart lacking hyo(孝), a heart lacking ja(慈), the heart lacking sin(信). In addition, the ong-gojib of <Ong-Gojib-Jeon> can be seen that it is characterized as lacking in, gyeong, hyo, ja, sin. Then, ong-gojib realizes his deficiency and recovers those factors, leading to goodness. Through this analysis, it is confirmed that “evil” is complimentary to the “good” in “Seong-li-hag.” Therefore, it is possible to discuss the concrete shape of good as the manifestation of evil. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the specific characteristics of goodness in <Ong-Gojib-Jeon> include conditions such as “fulfilling responsibilities for a position” and “knowing to establish a proper relationship.” In other words, the goodness revealed in <Ong-Gojib- Jeon> can be said to be a social necessity. Encouraging goodness for maintaining social order also originated from social necessity, and it is difficult to say that it is embodying some amount of absolute evil.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김흥규, "현대비평과 이론 3" 한신문화사 1992

2 이정원, "해학적 악인 캐릭터 디자인을 위한 서사적 접근" 한국고소설학회 (23) : 153-176, 2007

3 서인석, "조선 후기 향촌 사회의 악인 형상" 국어국문학회 3 : 159-194, 1999

4 김경호, "조선 유학의 개념들" 예문서원 2002

5 안영상, "조선 유학의 개념들" 예문서원 2002

6 박학래, "조선 유학의 개념들" 예문서원 2002

7 김형찬, "조선 유학의 개념들" 예문서원 2002

8 차영덕, "옹고집전" 보리출판사 2007

9 곽신환, "악이란 무엇인가" 창 1992

10 신재홍, "숙향, 심청, 흥부의 덕목들" 한국고전문학교육학회 (19) : 205-232, 2010

11 이동희, "성리학의 선악관와이－와이(y－Y)의 사고 양태" 동양철학연구회 (50) : 287-324, 2007

12 성백효, "대학" 전통문화연구회 2011

13 성백효, "논어" 전통문화연구회 2005

14 서대석, "고전소설의 행복한 결말과 한국인의 의식" 서울대학교 국어국문과 3 : 233-242, 1978

15 서인석, "고전소설의 결말구조와 그 세계관 : 홍길동전·구운몽·군담소설을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 1984

16 고정희, "고전문학의 시공간적 거리감과 문학사적 교육" 한국고전문학교육학회 (14) : 89-120, 2007

17 조희정, "고전 리터러시의 ‘시공간적 거리감’ 연구" 한국어교육학회 (119) : 61-93, 2006

18 강재철, "古小說의 懲惡樣相과 意義" 동양학연구원 (33) : 49-61, 2003

19 이강엽, "古典敍事物에 나타난 惡의 성격과 對處 樣態" 한국어문학회 (90) : 263-292, 2005

20 이강엽, "‘자기실현’으로 읽는 <옹고집전>" 한국고소설학회 (17) : 225-250, 2004