담배소송과 고엽제소송에 관한 연구 = 소송을 통한 법정책에의 영향을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I researched the relationship between law and policy litigation through the two representative lawsuit, that are the defoliant litigation and tobacco litigation. In particular, social interest is also high for the lawsuit that not only litigants, to lead to significant consequences for many persons, the judiciary and the political sphere is striving to actively solve the case. In the case of lawsuit of this kind, it is associated with a class action mainly in many cases, it is tinged with public interest litigation nature. Also, in most cases, lawsuit of this kind is necessary efforts to resolve the situation amicably through reconciliation.
In the case of Agent Orange litigation and tobacco litigation is a lawsuit to request compensation for damage parties. Rather than a lawsuit contesting the rights and obligations of individuals, it is a lawsuit that has been associated with the implementation of public policy in some respects. Therefore, in order to solve such a problem, legislation that assumes national agreement must be made. In order to achieve substantially the legislation, the pursuit of public interest judicial unit must be made. It is not only there is a limit coming from, such as the principle of separation of powers and the nature of justice in the judicial decision on public policy. That in such a limit even to comply with the appropriate level of the limiting factor will be the conditions to ensure the vitality and persuasive power of the court’s decision. So, the judiciary is, must take into account the interests of the entire nation and the public more actively. That attitude change of the judiciary aggressive and more, consider the phase and raison d’etre of the judiciary as the last bastion of the rule of law, it is important to encourage judicial activism.
Agent Orange litigation and tobacco litigation are not over yet in Korea. There is also a possibility that the litigation which began today in some respects. It is believed that shall take legal policy and reasonable compensation for Agent Orange victims and tobacco victims in our country. At that time, experience in the United States shall be a big help.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 담배소송
• Ⅲ. 고엽제소송
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임지봉, "헌법재판소 미디어법 관련 권한쟁의심판사건 결정의 헌법적 문제점" 법과사회 (38) : 69 ~ 92, 2010

2 경향신문, "월남 참전용사 고엽제 후유증" 1992

3 임지봉, "사법적극주의와 사법권 독립" 철학과 현실사, 2004

4 민병욱, "베트남 전쟁종결 17년만에.. 한국, 고엽제 문제삼다" 2011

5 미야모리 노리유끼, "미국의 PL소송을 알자: 이론과 실무의 해명" 대광서림, 1998

6 김운묵, "미국 담배소송의 변천과 보건법정책 효과" 의료법학 12 (1) : 133 ~ 173, 2011

7 이재결, "담배유해성 60년대부터 알고도 ‘시치미’" 석간 내일신문,

8 임존환, "그들은 아직도 전쟁 중-고엽제피해자 복지현황 문제점" 복지동향 44, 2002

9 홍준형, "공공정책에 대한 사법적 결정의 법이론적 한계(Ⅱ) - 대법원의 새만금사건 판결을 중심으로 -" 법제 (581), 2006

10 함영주, "고엽제피해자들의 구제와 민사소송법의 과제-헌법재판소 결정, 법관에 의한 법의 형성발전·사법적극주의와 관련하여-" 민사소송 4, 2001

11 백환기, "고엽제 피해 범위 인정의 확대경향에 따른 정책" 보건사회연구 20 (1), 2000

12 신웅식, "고엽제 손해배상 소송" 법조 43 (10), 1994

13 이투데이, "건보공단, 담배소송 12일 법정 공방 본격 시작...관심 '고조' 담배회사들 대형로펌 내세워 답변서 제출…서울중앙지법 첫 변론기일" 2014

14 棚瀬孝雄, "米国のタバコ訴訟について" 1998

15 高田昌宏, "民事訴訟における訴訟経済について" 早稲田法学 62 (4), 1987

16 南東鉉, "旣判力의 第三者에 대한 擴張 -ZPO상의 반사적 효력에 터잡은 비교법적 고찰" 민사소송 7 (2) : 272 ~ 321, 2003

17 横田明美, "政策実現における「訴訟」の機能"

18 飯田 遥, "損害賠償制度から見るタバコ訴訟～懲罰的損害賠償の意義について～" 三田祭論文集, 2002

19 加藤高志, "公益訴訟(政策形成訴訟)としての薬害肝炎訴訟" ノモス (25), 2009

20 大久保規子, "公害環境訴訟の新たな展開―権利救済から政策形成へ" 日本評論社, 2012

21 元百合子, "ベトナム戦争における米国の戦争犯罪-今も続く枯葉剤撒布の被害と不問にされた国家責任-" アジア太平洋研究センター年報, 2006

22 하태원, "ベトナム戦の枯葉剤被害、米軍は７８年に補償金　韓国など外国人被害者の訴訟は全て棄却" 동아일보, 2011

23 岡本 勝, "アメリカ合衆国における「現代タバコ戦争」の転換点としての1980年代-ニコチンの依存性と受動喫煙の危険性に関する史的考察-" 文明科学研究 8, 2013

24 藤倉皓一郎, "アメリカにおけるタバコ訴訟の展開と全面和解―紫煙のゆくえ―" ジュリスト (1118), 1997

25 棚瀬孝雄, "たばこ訴訟の法社会学" 世界思想社, 2000

26 한겨례 오피니언, "[사설] 대법원의 고엽제 판결이 아쉬운 이유" 한겨레 오피니언, 2013

27 The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, "VA’s Guide on Agent Orange Claims"

28 Yuriko Moto, "U.S. Use of Toxic Materials in Warfare and International Law: A Case Study of “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation" 大阪女学院大学紀要 (3), 2006

29 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General" 2000

30 "The Tobacco settlement, reached by the State Attorneys General and the Tobacco industry" 1997

31 Abram Chayes, "The Supreme Court, 1981 Term: Foreword: Public Law Litigation and the Burger Court" Harv. L. Rev 96 : 4 ~, 1982

32 Abram Chayes, "The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation" HARV. L. REV 89 : 1281 ~, 1976

33 Mark Brown, "The Role of Science in Department of Veterans Affairs Disability Compensation Policies for Environmental and Occupational Illnesses and Injuries" Journal of Law and Policy 13, 2005

34 Vincent Blasi, "The First Amendment and Cigarette Advertising" Journal of the American Medical Association 256 (4), 1986

35 Allan M. Brandt, "The Cigarette, Risk, and American Culture" Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1990

36 Allan M. Brandt, "The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America" Basic Books, 2007

37 Robert L. Rabin, "Smoking Policy: Law, Politics, and Culture" Oxford University Press, 1993

38 David L. Hudson, Jr., "Smoking Bans" Chelsea House Publishers, 2004

39 "Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents" 61 FR 44396, 1996

40 R. E. Goodin, "No Smoking: The Ethical Issues" The University of Chicago Press, 1989

41 Schecter A, "Food as a source of dioxin exposure in the residences of Bien Hoa city, Vietnam" Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 45 (8), 2003

42 Taiwo A. Oriola, "Ethical and Legal Analyses of Policy Prohibiting Tobacco Smoking in Enclosed Public Spaces, developing oversight approaches to nanobiotechnology: the lessons of history" 2009

43 Vietnam Veterans, "Disability Compensation For Exposure To Agent Orange for Veterans and Their Families" 2012

44 Todd S. Purdum, "Clinton Orders Expanded Agent Orange Benefits for Veterans" the New York Times, 1996