RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      러·북 군사협력이 국제 비확산 체제와 한반도에 미치는 영향 - NPT, 안보리, NATO, 한·미동맹과의 연관성 - = Impact of North Korea-Russia Military Cooperation on the International Non-Proliferation Regimes and on the Korean Peninsula: Relating with the NPT, the UN Security Council, the NATO and the US-ROK Alliance

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      After signing a ‘Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement’ between North Korea and Russia, it is noteworthy to watch how developing North Korea-Russia military cooperation will affect the NPT regime and security order in Northeast Asia. If North Korea and Russia will exchange North Korea’s conventional weapons and Russia’s highly advanced military technology (possibly satellite/nuclear related one), it can clearly violate existing UN Security Council sanction resolutions or the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
      In addition to the violation of such international norms, North Korea-Russia military cooperation possibly together with China might lead to geopolitical confrontation (North Korea-Russia-China vs South Korea-the US-Japan) in Northeast Asia. Against the backdrop, South Korea the US and Japan warned on the North Korea-Russia military cooperation which could seriously destabilize situation in the Korean Peninsula. But China seems to be not willing to join the military cooperation with North Korea and Russia to avoid risk of worsening US-China relation and North Korea’s advancing satellite (ICBM) and nuclear weapon technology in violation of relevant UNSC resolutions.
      At the NATO summit held at Washington D.C. in July 2024, leaders of NATO member states expressed concern over North Korea-Russia military cooperation in terms of security connectivity between Asia and Europe, and agreed to respond to North Korea and Russia together with IP4 NATO partner countries: Rok(South Korea), Japan, Australia and New Zealand.
      Under the circumstance, most realistic option which South Korea can take now is to further strengthen the US-ROK alliance based on the ‘Washington Declaration’ and the ROK-US-Japan Trilateral Security Cooperation agreed at the Camp David in 2023. To implement the ‘Washington Declaration’, it is important to get assurance of the US extended nuclear deterrence at the equivalent level of quasi-permanent deployment of strategic assets through standing mechanism of the Nuclear Consultative Group (NCG). By doing so, it will contribute to countering continued threat of North Korea nuclear weapons.
      번역하기

      After signing a ‘Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement’ between North Korea and Russia, it is noteworthy to watch how developing North Korea-Russia military cooperation will affect the NPT regime and security order in Northeast Asia. If No...

      After signing a ‘Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement’ between North Korea and Russia, it is noteworthy to watch how developing North Korea-Russia military cooperation will affect the NPT regime and security order in Northeast Asia. If North Korea and Russia will exchange North Korea’s conventional weapons and Russia’s highly advanced military technology (possibly satellite/nuclear related one), it can clearly violate existing UN Security Council sanction resolutions or the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
      In addition to the violation of such international norms, North Korea-Russia military cooperation possibly together with China might lead to geopolitical confrontation (North Korea-Russia-China vs South Korea-the US-Japan) in Northeast Asia. Against the backdrop, South Korea the US and Japan warned on the North Korea-Russia military cooperation which could seriously destabilize situation in the Korean Peninsula. But China seems to be not willing to join the military cooperation with North Korea and Russia to avoid risk of worsening US-China relation and North Korea’s advancing satellite (ICBM) and nuclear weapon technology in violation of relevant UNSC resolutions.
      At the NATO summit held at Washington D.C. in July 2024, leaders of NATO member states expressed concern over North Korea-Russia military cooperation in terms of security connectivity between Asia and Europe, and agreed to respond to North Korea and Russia together with IP4 NATO partner countries: Rok(South Korea), Japan, Australia and New Zealand.
      Under the circumstance, most realistic option which South Korea can take now is to further strengthen the US-ROK alliance based on the ‘Washington Declaration’ and the ROK-US-Japan Trilateral Security Cooperation agreed at the Camp David in 2023. To implement the ‘Washington Declaration’, it is important to get assurance of the US extended nuclear deterrence at the equivalent level of quasi-permanent deployment of strategic assets through standing mechanism of the Nuclear Consultative Group (NCG). By doing so, it will contribute to countering continued threat of North Korea nuclear weapons.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼