RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동아시아 공덕ㆍ사덕 담론과 근대 주체 기획 = Public and Private Virtues in East Asia and Modern Subject

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103204788

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      One of the indicators revealing the conceptual change of morality in the modern transition period was the discourse on public and private virtues (公德, 私德). Historically, the division of the semantic range of virtue between public and private spheres appeared in the late 19th century. Traditionally, private virtue referred to personal attachment and favor, while public virtue meant the virtue and good deeds of an individual. Liang Qichao`s New People exercised a far-reaching influence on the modern public and private virtue discourse in Korea.
      It seems that Liang`s public virtue was inspired by the public virtue promotion movement in Meiji Japan which had been led by its government. Japan stressed public virtue in order to strengthen its emperor system and foster loyal people. Liang thought that the Chinese Confucianism had been carried away by private virtue, lacking public virtue, and considered patriotism as key to the spirit that new people should have. Although admitting later that unique Chinese culture could be highly useful and private virtue could provide the foundation of public virtue, he never abandoned the moral utility perspective that should work for national interests. In the Great Han Korea period, newspapers and journals accepted this idea, and argued that the lack of public virtue was an obstacle to modern national building. Public virtue referred to national spirit beyond the personal sphere, which the high ego (大我) or new people must carry. Public virtue was coupled with the rise of `society`, the public sphere in the space between individual, family, and nation, while the East Asian discourse on public virtue in the early 20th century tended to converge on the ideas of people and nation. Passing through the modern public and private virtue discourse, morality became confined into exclusive patriotism within a nation.
      번역하기

      One of the indicators revealing the conceptual change of morality in the modern transition period was the discourse on public and private virtues (公德, 私德). Historically, the division of the semantic range of virtue between public and private s...

      One of the indicators revealing the conceptual change of morality in the modern transition period was the discourse on public and private virtues (公德, 私德). Historically, the division of the semantic range of virtue between public and private spheres appeared in the late 19th century. Traditionally, private virtue referred to personal attachment and favor, while public virtue meant the virtue and good deeds of an individual. Liang Qichao`s New People exercised a far-reaching influence on the modern public and private virtue discourse in Korea.
      It seems that Liang`s public virtue was inspired by the public virtue promotion movement in Meiji Japan which had been led by its government. Japan stressed public virtue in order to strengthen its emperor system and foster loyal people. Liang thought that the Chinese Confucianism had been carried away by private virtue, lacking public virtue, and considered patriotism as key to the spirit that new people should have. Although admitting later that unique Chinese culture could be highly useful and private virtue could provide the foundation of public virtue, he never abandoned the moral utility perspective that should work for national interests. In the Great Han Korea period, newspapers and journals accepted this idea, and argued that the lack of public virtue was an obstacle to modern national building. Public virtue referred to national spirit beyond the personal sphere, which the high ego (大我) or new people must carry. Public virtue was coupled with the rise of `society`, the public sphere in the space between individual, family, and nation, while the East Asian discourse on public virtue in the early 20th century tended to converge on the ideas of people and nation. Passing through the modern public and private virtue discourse, morality became confined into exclusive patriotism within a nation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "황성신문"

      2 박정심, "한국근대사상사" 천년의상상 2016

      3 박근갑, "한국 개념사 방법론 소고 -‘역사’ 개념을 중심으로-" 한국텍스트언어학회 33 : 55-85, 2012

      4 미조구치 유조, "한 단어 사전 公私" 푸른역사 2012

      5 김미정, "차이와 윤리: 개화 주체성의 형성" 소명출판 2014

      6 미조구치 유조, "중국의 공과 사" 신서원 2004

      7 미조구치 유조, "중국사상문화사전" 책과함께 2011

      8 마루야마 마사오, "일본정치사상사연구" 통나무 1998

      9 고야스 노부쿠니, "일본 내셔널리즘 해부" 그린비 2011

      10 이승환, "유교 담론의 지형학" 푸른숲 2004

      1 "황성신문"

      2 박정심, "한국근대사상사" 천년의상상 2016

      3 박근갑, "한국 개념사 방법론 소고 -‘역사’ 개념을 중심으로-" 한국텍스트언어학회 33 : 55-85, 2012

      4 미조구치 유조, "한 단어 사전 公私" 푸른역사 2012

      5 김미정, "차이와 윤리: 개화 주체성의 형성" 소명출판 2014

      6 미조구치 유조, "중국의 공과 사" 신서원 2004

      7 미조구치 유조, "중국사상문화사전" 책과함께 2011

      8 마루야마 마사오, "일본정치사상사연구" 통나무 1998

      9 고야스 노부쿠니, "일본 내셔널리즘 해부" 그린비 2011

      10 이승환, "유교 담론의 지형학" 푸른숲 2004

      11 이혜경, "신민설" 도서출판 관악 2006

      12 윤해동, "식민지 공공성 실체와 은유의 거리" 책과함께 2010

      13 송호근, "시민의 탄생" 민음사 2013

      14 "백암박은식전집" 동방미디어 2002

      15 "매일신보"

      16 "대한매일신보"

      17 "단재신채호전집" 독립기념관 한국독립운동사연구소 2009

      18 장인성, "근대 한국의 국제 관념에 나타난 도덕과 권력" 서울대학교출판부 2006

      19 박정심, "근대 유학인식의 변화에 대한 연구" 동양고전학회 (26) : 37-74, 2007

      20 진관타오, "관념사란 무엇인가 1,2" 푸른역사 2012

      21 이경구, "개념의 번역과 창조-개념사로 본 동아시아 근대" 돌베개 2012

      22 "高等小学修身書 女生用 巻1" 文部省 1904

      23 教育研究所, "高等小学修身教典 生徒用 巻1" 普及舎 1899

      24 梁啓超, "飮冰室專集" 臺灣中華書局印行

      25 内村鑑三, "警世雑著" 民友社 1896

      26 言文一致研究会, "言文一致" 吉岡書店 1901

      27 高島平三郎, "教育漫筆" 元々堂 1903

      28 足立栗園, "学校と家庭" 積善館 1901

      29 寒沢振作, "国の栄" 金港堂 1892

      30 陸羯南, "原政及国際論" 日本新聞社 1893

      31 朴晶東, "初等修身" 同文社 1909

      32 井上円了, "円了随筆" 哲学館 1901

      33 帝国教育会, "公徳養成国民唱歌" 松声堂 1903

      34 八木原真之輔, "公徳養成之栞" 開発社 1901

      35 五十嵐清蔵, "公徳養成之友" 1902

      36 田沼書店, "公徳唱歌" 田沼書店 1901

      37 谷口流鶯, "公徳と公民 補習及家庭用" 盛林堂 1903

      38 読売新聞社, "『公徳養成之実例』 附 英人之気質" 文学堂 1903

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 동양철학연구(Journal of Eastern Philosophy) -> 동양철학연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Eastern Philosophy
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.59
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.54 1.394 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼