A corpus-based study on the weak obligation modals = Should, ought to and had better

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. Introduction
• 2. Literature Review
• 3. Method
• 4. Results
• 5. Discussion/Conclusion
• References

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Davis, M, "VIEW: Variations in English words and phrases. [website interface for British National Corpus]. http://view.byu.edu/bnc"

2 Azar,B.S, "Understanding and using English grammar" Longman. 1999

3 Celce-Murcia, M., "The grammar book" Newbury House Publishers. 1999

4 Myhill, J., "The development of strong obligation system in American English" 71 : 339-388, 1996

5 Verstraete, J-C, "Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system" 33 : 1505-1528, 2001

6 Verstraete,J-C, "Scaler quantity implicatures and the interpretation of modality problems in the deontic domain" 37 : 1401-1418, 2005

7 Hoffman, T. R, "Realms of meaning" Longman. 1993

8 Swan, M, "Practical English usage" Oxford University Press 2005

9 Chong, H., "On English modal auxiliaries from the discourse perspective" 47 : 207-232, 2005

10 Frank, M, "Modern English: A practical reference guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents/Prentice Hall"

11 Palmer, F. R, "Modality and the English modals" Longman 1990

12 Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" Longman. 1999

13 Alexander, L. G, "Longman English grammar practice" Longman 1990

14 Alexander, L. G, "Longman English grammar" Longman 1988

15 Swan, M, "How English works" Oxford University Press 1997

16 Byrd, P., "Applied English grammar" Heinle & Heinle. 1992

17 Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" Longman 1985

18 Leech, G., "A communicative grammar of English" Pearson 2002