설명문의 대용어 참조해결과정 : 대용어와 지시사 생략 효과 = Anaphoric Reference Resolution in Expository Text : The Effects of Ellipsis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Two experiments were conducted to explore the effects of anaphora and demonstrative ellipsis on reference resolution. This study assumed that two type of ellipsis could be sensitive to antecedents' saliency: the reverse typicality and mention order of antecedents. The muti-task approach measured the antecedent's activation level and processing load for the conflict resolution of theories of anaphoric resolution. In Experiment 1, using ellipsis for anaphora, participants read a series of sentence pairs by self-paced and performed a probe recognition test. The results showed the main effects of antecedent's typicality and mention order in both tasks. In Experiment 2, using noun phrase without demonstrative for anaphora, participants read a series of sentence pairs by self-paced and performed a probe recognition test. The results showed main effects of mention order of antecedents for probe recognition task only. The first antecedent was recognized faster than the second one. The results of two experiments suggested that anaphora type and antecedent's saliency were dynamically interact in reference resolution for Korean.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 대용어나 지시사가 생략된 조건에서 선행어의 전형성과 언급순서가 참조해결에 작용하는 효과를 살펴보기 위해서 2개의 실험을 실시하였다. 실험 1은 대용어 생략과 대명사 조건을 비교하였다. 대용어 생략은 전형성과 언급순서가 읽기과제에 반영되었고, 언급순서 효과가 탐사재인과제에 반영되었다. 반면에 대명사는 전형성과 언급순서 효과가 탐사재인과제에만 반영되었다. 실험 2에서는 지시사가 생략된 명사반복과 대명사 조건을 비교하였다. 명사반복이 대명사에 비해서 읽기시간이 길었으며, 언급순서 효과가 탐사재인과제에 반영되었다. 반면에 대명사는 전형성과 언급순서가 탐사재인과제에서 반영되었다. 이는 선행어와 대용어의 참조해결이 직선적이기보다는 역동적일 가능성을 시사하였다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 연구문제
• 실험 1: 대용어 생략 조건
• 실험 2: 지시사 생략 조건
• 참고문헌
• (Abstract)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재호, "한국어 어휘의 언급순서가 문장 기억의 표상에 미치는 효과: 첫 언급, 최신, 및 의미편향 효과의 상호작용" 한국인지및생물심리학회 14 (14): 11-427, 2002

2 이재호, "언어 이해과정의 연구 방법, in: 인지심리학의 제 문제 II: 언어와 인지" 학지사 155-182, 1998

3 이재호, "시간경과에 따른 대명사 참조해결과정" 고려대학교 1993

4 이재호, "설명문의 대용어 참조해결과정: 지시사 유형의 효과" 한국심리학회 28 (28): 547-569, 2009

5 이숙, "생략의 담화 원리" 27 : 217-229, 2008

6 이재호, "담화글의 대명사 참조해결과정: 명명과제에 반영된 성별표지와 언급순서의 상호작용" 한국인지및생물심리학회 18 (18): 39-56, 2006

7 이기갑, "국어 담화의 연결 표지-완형 표현의 반복" 담화·인지언어학회 13 (13): 133-158, 2006

8 Garrod, S., "processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals, in: Comprehension processes in reading" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 465-486, 1990

9 Sanford, A. J., "What, when, and how?: Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution" 4 : 235-262, 1989

10 Sanford, A. J., "Understanding written language" John Wiley 1981

11 Gernsbacher, M. A., "Two decades of structure building" 23 : 265-304, 1997

12 Foraker, S., "The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations" 56 : 357-383, 2007

13 Almor, A., "The form of referential expressions in discourse" 1 : 84-99, 2007

14 Gernsbacher, M. A., "The definite article the as a cue to map thematic information, in: Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies" John Benjamins 119-136, 2001

15 Kim, S. I., "The advantage of first mention in Korean: The temporal contributions of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors" 33 : 475-491, 2004

16 Tapiero, I, "Situation models and levels of coherence: Toward a definition of comprehension" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2007

17 Gundel, J. K., "Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives" Oxford University Press 2008

18 Klin, C. M., "Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution" 32 : 511-522, 2004

19 Gordon, P. C., "Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence" 34 : 216-231, 1995

20 Matthews, A., "Pronoun resolution in two-clause sentences: Effects of ambiguity, antecedents location, and depth of embedding" 27 : 245-260, 1988

21 Corbett, A. T., "Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedent" 16 : 283-298, 1983

22 Gordon, P. C., "Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases" 14 : 353-379, 1999

23 Almor, A, "Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis" 106 : 748-765, 1999

24 Haberlandt, K., "Methods in reading research, in: Handbook of psycholinguistics" Academic Press 1-31, 1994

25 Gernsbacher, M. A, "Mechanisms that improve referential access" 32 : 99-156, 1989

26 Gernsbacher, M. A., "Language comprehension as structure building" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1990

27 Gordon, P. C., "Language comprehension and probe-list memory" 26 : 766-775, 2000

28 Garrod, S. C., "Interpreting anaphoric relations: The Integration of semantic information while reading" 16 : 77-90, 1977

29 Gundel, J. K., "Information structure and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities, in: Proceedings from the Workshop on Information Structure" European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information 37-51, 2001

30 Almor, A., "Focus and noun phrase anaphors in spoken language comprehension" 23 : 201-225, 2008

31 Abbott, B, "Definite and indefinite" 3 : 392-399, 2006

32 이정모, "Contrastive Information Processing in Discourse Comprehension" 한국인지과학회 16 (16): 69-92, 2005

33 Gundel, J., "Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse" 69 : 274-307, 1993

34 van Gompel, R. P. G., "Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns" 90 : 255-264, 2004

35 Cowles, H. W., "Antecedent focus and conceptual distance effects in category noun-phrase anaphora" 20 : 725-750, 2005

36 Lee, J-H., "Anaphoric inference in expository text: The effects of anaphora type, mention order and typicality of antecedent" The 27th Cognitive Science Society Annual Meeting 2005

37 Marslen-Wilson, W., "Against modularity, in: Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding" MIT Press 37-62, 1987

38 Ariel, M, "Accessibility theory: An overview, in: Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects" John Benjamins Publishing Company 29-87, 2001

39 Sanders, T., "Accessibility in text and discourse processing" 37 : 79-89, 2004