RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SSCI

      Building education groups as school collaboration for education improvement: a case study of stakeholder interactions in District A of Chengdu

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107882761

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      School collaboration has become a popular approach for education improvement in global education reform. This study examined the dynamics of stakeholder school collaboration in China to improve public education using a case study focused on an Education Group government initiative in Chengdu, China. Frist an introduction to a global reform for education improvement through school collaboration is given, followed by a review of global reform for school collaboration and Hargreaves and Shirley’s discussion on design and innovation for school networks and collaboration to visualize the framework for the interpretation of the stakeholders’ school collaborative interactions. Then, the school collaboration for education improvement in China is examined in detail based on 20 interviews with stakeholders from educational authorities, the lead and member schools involved in the establishment of the Education Groups in Chengdu, China. The interviews were designed based on a review of policy documents about construction of the Education Groups in Chengdu. The fndings revealed that the establishment of the Education Groups in Chengdu was driven by both top-down initiatives and bottom-up innovations, and while there had been some success in improving education quality in the lower performing schools, the stakeholder interactions had been hindered by the lack of policy coordination within and beyond the education reforms. It was concluded that a collective institutional context was needed to foster the shared values and trust needed between all stakeholders and promote the sustainable reform of the Education Groups to ensure education equity and quality.
      번역하기

      School collaboration has become a popular approach for education improvement in global education reform. This study examined the dynamics of stakeholder school collaboration in China to improve public education using a case study focused on an Educati...

      School collaboration has become a popular approach for education improvement in global education reform. This study examined the dynamics of stakeholder school collaboration in China to improve public education using a case study focused on an Education Group government initiative in Chengdu, China. Frist an introduction to a global reform for education improvement through school collaboration is given, followed by a review of global reform for school collaboration and Hargreaves and Shirley’s discussion on design and innovation for school networks and collaboration to visualize the framework for the interpretation of the stakeholders’ school collaborative interactions. Then, the school collaboration for education improvement in China is examined in detail based on 20 interviews with stakeholders from educational authorities, the lead and member schools involved in the establishment of the Education Groups in Chengdu, China. The interviews were designed based on a review of policy documents about construction of the Education Groups in Chengdu. The fndings revealed that the establishment of the Education Groups in Chengdu was driven by both top-down initiatives and bottom-up innovations, and while there had been some success in improving education quality in the lower performing schools, the stakeholder interactions had been hindered by the lack of policy coordination within and beyond the education reforms. It was concluded that a collective institutional context was needed to foster the shared values and trust needed between all stakeholders and promote the sustainable reform of the Education Groups to ensure education equity and quality.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ainscow, M., "Using collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in complex and challenging circumstances: What makes the diference?" National College for School Leadership 2006

      2 Meng, F., "Three modes of running schools by group in elementary education in China" 441 : 40-45, 2016

      3 Yong, G. L. C. C, "The role of heads of department in cluster secondary schools in Singapore" University of Leicester 2006

      4 Gao, Y., "The present situation and developmental trend of educational groups in China (in Chinese)" 22 (22): 36-42, 2011

      5 Hargreaves, A., "The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence" Corwin 2012

      6 Hargreaves, A., "The fourth way: The inspiring future of educational change" Corwin 2009

      7 OECD, "Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States" OECD 2011

      8 Weick, K, "Sensemaking in organizations" Sage Publications 1995

      9 Armstrong, P. W., "School-toschool collaboration in England: A confgurative review of the empirical evidence" 2021

      10 Armstrong, P. W., "School-to-school support within a competitive education system : Views from the inside" 29 (29): 614-633, 2018

      1 Ainscow, M., "Using collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in complex and challenging circumstances: What makes the diference?" National College for School Leadership 2006

      2 Meng, F., "Three modes of running schools by group in elementary education in China" 441 : 40-45, 2016

      3 Yong, G. L. C. C, "The role of heads of department in cluster secondary schools in Singapore" University of Leicester 2006

      4 Gao, Y., "The present situation and developmental trend of educational groups in China (in Chinese)" 22 (22): 36-42, 2011

      5 Hargreaves, A., "The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence" Corwin 2012

      6 Hargreaves, A., "The fourth way: The inspiring future of educational change" Corwin 2009

      7 OECD, "Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States" OECD 2011

      8 Weick, K, "Sensemaking in organizations" Sage Publications 1995

      9 Armstrong, P. W., "School-toschool collaboration in England: A confgurative review of the empirical evidence" 2021

      10 Armstrong, P. W., "School-to-school support within a competitive education system : Views from the inside" 29 (29): 614-633, 2018

      11 Jensen, B., "School turnaround in Shanghai: The empowered-management program approach to improving school performance" Center for American Progress 2013

      12 West, M., "School leadership-international perspectives" Springer 1-18, 2010

      13 Keddie, A., "School autonomy, accountability and collaboration:A critical review" 47 (47): 1-17, 2015

      14 Gu, M., "Portraits of Chinese schools" Higher Education Press & Springer 2017

      15 Zhong, K., "Paired assistance in China: Origins, formation and development" 2013 (2013): 14-24, 2013

      16 The Central Committee of CCP, & The State Council, "Outline of national medium-term and long-term program for education reform and development" The Central Committee of CCP & The State Council 2010

      17 Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance, "Opinions on rotation of school leaders and teachers in compulsory education schools at county (district) level" Ministry of Education 2014

      18 Chengdu City Education Bureau, "Opinions on promoting development of “Education Groups”" Chengdu City Education Bureau 2009

      19 Chengdu City Education Bureau, "Opinions on further improvement of development of Education Groups" Chengdu City Education Bureau 2016

      20 Ministry of Education, "Opinions on enhancing the balanced development of compulsory education" Ministry of Education 2005

      21 The General Ofce of the Central Committee of CPC, "Opinions on deepening reform of education system and mechanism" The General Ofce of the Central Committee of CPC & The General Ofce of the State Council 2017

      22 The State Education Commission, "Notifcation of minutes of national conference on one-on-one educational assistance" The State Education Commission 1994

      23 Hayes, G., "Local partnerships: Blowing in the wind of national policy changes" 39 (39): 425-446, 2013

      24 Tan, C., "Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving education success" Springer Singapore 2013

      25 Hadfeld, M., "Leading school-based networks" Routledge 2009

      26 The National People’s Congress, "Law of regional autonomy for ethnic minorities in the People’s Republic of China" The National People’s Congress 1984

      27 Liu, J., "Inequality in public school admission in urban China:Discourses" Springer 2018

      28 Muijs, D, "Improving schools through collaboration: A mixed methods study of school-to-school partnerships in the primary sector" 41 (41): 563-586, 2015

      29 Liang, X., "How Shanghai does it:Insights and lessons from the highest-ranking education system in the world" World Bank Group 2016

      30 Befy, M., "Has the “Ambition Success Networks” educational program achieved its ambition?" 111-112 : 271-293, 2013

      31 Sato, M., "Gako wo kaigakusuru: Manabi no kyodotai no kosou to jisen (Reforming schools: concepts of Learning Community and its practices)" Iwanami Shoten 2012

      32 Yang, X., "Exploring the new mechanisms of balanced high quality development of regional compulsory education: An example of collective school running" 24 : 1-9, 2014

      33 Zhou, Z., "Equity in excellence:Experiences of East Asian high-performing education systems" Springer 27-41, 2019

      34 OECD, "Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools" OECD 2012

      35 Armstrong, P., "Efective school partneships and collaboration for school improvement: A review of the evidence" Department for Education 2015

      36 Yuan, Z, "Education quality as the priority for urban-rural integration" Educational Science Publishing House 2012

      37 Shi, G., "Education Groups: Time shift of balanced development of education" Zhejing University Press 2011

      38 Tan, C., "Dynamics of change: Decentralised centralism of education in Singapore" 8 (8): 155-168, 2007

      39 Han, Z., "Contemporary value systems in China" China Social Sciences Press & Springer 2018

      40 Liu, J, "Constructing resource sharing collaboration for quality public education in urban China: Case study of school alliance in Beijing" 59 : 9-19, 2018

      41 Chapman, C., "Collaborative school turnaround:A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes" 12 (12): 200-226, 2013

      42 Muijs, D., "Collaboration and networking in education" Springer 2011

      43 The General Ofce of the Central Committee of CPC, "China’s educational modernization 2035" The General Ofce of the Central Committee of CPC & The General Ofce of the State Council 2019

      44 Group of Book Series of Comprehensive Education Reform of Chengdu, "Chengxiang Yiti Ronghe Fazhan: Chengdu Shi Mingxiao Jietuan Fazhan Shijian Yanjiu (Integrated Development of Urban and Rural Areas: A study on the practice of Chengdu Elite School Groups)" People’s Publishing House 2019

      45 Ainscow, M., "Changing education systems: A research-based approach" Routledge 2020

      46 Liu, J, "Annual report on China’s education (2019)" Social Sciences Academic Press 204-219, 2019

      47 Gergen, K. J, "An invitation to social construction" SAGE Publications 2015

      48 Burr, V, "An introduction to social constructionism" Routledge 1995

      49 Liu, X., "A best-know school group: “Chengdu Model” with balanced coverage of high quality education" 29 (29): 15-19, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SSCI 등재 (등재후보1차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.18 0.33
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.27 0.292 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼