RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Decentralization, legitimacy, and democracy in post-Soviet Central Asia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108140975

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      During the 1990s, a conventional wisdom emerged, based on literature going back decades, that political decentralization might be among the most effective forces for democratization. If ordinary people could participate in autonomous local governments, democracy would be built from the ground up, ultimately shaping the entire political system. Once decentralization reforms were implemented across the world, however, the results were disappointing. Authoritarianism not only thrived at the local level, it could also undermine democratization at the national level. Thus, local-national transference still held, but sometimes as a poison. In this context, the case of post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan is an anomaly. Here, the relative success of political decentralization—rather than its failure—nevertheless failed to spur democratization at the national level. I argue that this is because decentralization allowed national authorities to appease international donors while they consolidated their own power. Moreover, while decentralization empowered local communities, it did so in ways that personalized local authority and pitted local and national authorities against one another, resulting in intense localism and antagonistic center-local relations that undermined any democratic transference. The case study findings are based on ten months of field research, which includes interviews with local and national officials, ordinary villagers, and representatives of NGOs and international organizations.
      번역하기

      During the 1990s, a conventional wisdom emerged, based on literature going back decades, that political decentralization might be among the most effective forces for democratization. If ordinary people could participate in autonomous local governments...

      During the 1990s, a conventional wisdom emerged, based on literature going back decades, that political decentralization might be among the most effective forces for democratization. If ordinary people could participate in autonomous local governments, democracy would be built from the ground up, ultimately shaping the entire political system. Once decentralization reforms were implemented across the world, however, the results were disappointing. Authoritarianism not only thrived at the local level, it could also undermine democratization at the national level. Thus, local-national transference still held, but sometimes as a poison. In this context, the case of post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan is an anomaly. Here, the relative success of political decentralization—rather than its failure—nevertheless failed to spur democratization at the national level. I argue that this is because decentralization allowed national authorities to appease international donors while they consolidated their own power. Moreover, while decentralization empowered local communities, it did so in ways that personalized local authority and pitted local and national authorities against one another, resulting in intense localism and antagonistic center-local relations that undermined any democratic transference. The case study findings are based on ten months of field research, which includes interviews with local and national officials, ordinary villagers, and representatives of NGOs and international organizations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 The World Bank, "World Development Report, 1997: The state in a changing world" Oxford University Press 1997

      2 Radnitz, S., "Weapons of the wealthy: Predatory regimes and elite-led protests in central Asia" Cornell University Press 2010

      3 Herrfahrdt-Pahle, E., "Two steps forward, one step back: ¨Institutional change in Kyrgyz water governance" Springer 277-301, 2008

      4 Robert T. Gannett, "Tocqueville and Local Government: Distinguishing Democracy's Second Track" Cambridge University Press (CUP) 67 (67): 721-736, 2005

      5 Massicard, E., "The uzbek mahalla: Between state and society" Routledge 205-218, 2003

      6 Manor, J., "The political economy of democratic decentralization" The World Bank 1999

      7 Almond, G. A., "The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations" Sage Publications, Inc 1963

      8 Eugene Huskey, "The Barriers to Intra-Opposition Cooperation in the Post-Communist World: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan" Informa UK Limited 26 (26): 228-262, 2010

      9 Cornelius, W. A., "Subnational politics and democratization:Tensions between center and periphery in the Mexican political system" University of California 3-16, 1999

      10 Ayten Alkan, "Strengthening Local Democracy or Neo-Liberal Conversions? New Local Governmental Legislation in Turkey" Institut Za Lokalno Samoupravo in Javna Narocila Maribor 9 (9): 23-38, 2011

      1 The World Bank, "World Development Report, 1997: The state in a changing world" Oxford University Press 1997

      2 Radnitz, S., "Weapons of the wealthy: Predatory regimes and elite-led protests in central Asia" Cornell University Press 2010

      3 Herrfahrdt-Pahle, E., "Two steps forward, one step back: ¨Institutional change in Kyrgyz water governance" Springer 277-301, 2008

      4 Robert T. Gannett, "Tocqueville and Local Government: Distinguishing Democracy's Second Track" Cambridge University Press (CUP) 67 (67): 721-736, 2005

      5 Massicard, E., "The uzbek mahalla: Between state and society" Routledge 205-218, 2003

      6 Manor, J., "The political economy of democratic decentralization" The World Bank 1999

      7 Almond, G. A., "The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations" Sage Publications, Inc 1963

      8 Eugene Huskey, "The Barriers to Intra-Opposition Cooperation in the Post-Communist World: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan" Informa UK Limited 26 (26): 228-262, 2010

      9 Cornelius, W. A., "Subnational politics and democratization:Tensions between center and periphery in the Mexican political system" University of California 3-16, 1999

      10 Ayten Alkan, "Strengthening Local Democracy or Neo-Liberal Conversions? New Local Governmental Legislation in Turkey" Institut Za Lokalno Samoupravo in Javna Narocila Maribor 9 (9): 23-38, 2011

      11 Fattakhov, B., "Stanovlenie Mestnogo Samoupravleniya v Kyrgyzstane" (15-16) : 2013

      12 Umbetalieva, T., "Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya I obshchestvenno politicheskaya situatsiia v strane: Politicheskaya situatsiia v strane glazami kazakhstantsev" AAO 2009

      13 Siegel, D., "Social ties and state formation in post-soviet central Asia" City University 2016

      14 Baimyrzaeva, M., "Shortcomings of institutional reform in public sector governance: The case of Kyrgyzstan" University of Southern California 2010

      15 Levada-Center, "Russian Public Opinion, 2018" Moxcow 2019

      16 The World Bank, "Rural development: From vision to action" The World Bank 1997

      17 Humphrey, C., "Rethinking bribery in contemporary Russia" Martin’s Press 216-241, 2000

      18 Babken Babajanian, "Promoting empowerment? The World Bank's Village Investment Project in Kyrgyzstan" Informa UK Limited 34 (34): 499-515, 2015

      19 Boris-mathieu Pétric, "Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan or the birth of a globalized protectorate" Informa UK Limited 24 (24): 319-332, 2005

      20 Dahl, R. A., "Polyarchy : Participation and opposition" Yale University Press 1972

      21 RAFIS ABAZOV, "Policy of economic transition in Kyrgyzstan" Informa UK Limited 18 (18): 197-223, 1999

      22 Jonathan T. Hiskey, "Pitfalls of power to the people: Decentralization, local government performance, and system support in Bolivia" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 37 (37): 64-88, 2003

      23 Hale, H. E., "Patronal politics: Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective" Cambridge University Press 2015

      24 Gerd Schonwalder, "New Democratic Spaces at the Grassroots? Popular Participation in Latin American Local Governments" Wiley 28 (28): 753-770, 1997

      25 PATRICK HELLER, "Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre" SAGE Publications 29 (29): 131-163, 2001

      26 Alymkulov, E., "Local government in the Kyrgyz republic" Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative 2001

      27 A. Vetter, "Local Political Competence in Europe: A Resource of Legitimacy for Higher Levels of Government?" Oxford University Press (OUP) 14 (14): 3-18, 2002

      28 Jonathan T. Hiskey, "Local Context and Democratization in Mexico" Wiley 49 (49): 57-71, 2005

      29 Ibraimova, A., "Legal and institutional framework for empowerment of rural communities in the Kyrgyz republic" LIT Verlag 2009

      30 Anderson, J., "Kyrgyzstan: Central Asia’s Island of de mocracy" Harwood Academic Publishers 1999

      31 Marat, E., "Kyrgyzstan. Nations in Transit" Freedom House Press 2012

      32 Marat, E., "Kyrgyzstan. Nations in Transit" Freedom House Press 2018

      33 Marat, E., "Kyrgyzstan. Nations in Transit" Freedom House Press 2017

      34 Mahabat Baimyrzaeva, "Kyrgyzstan's Public Sector Reforms: 1991–2010" Informa UK Limited 34 (34): 555-566, 2011

      35 International Crisis Group., "Kyrgyzstan at ten: Trouble in the “Island of democracy”" ICG 2001

      36 Freedom House, "Kyrgyzstan" Freedom House 2003

      37 International Republican Institute., "Kazakhstan national opinion poll"

      38 Dave, B., "Kazakhstan Nations in Transit" Freedom House Press 2013

      39 Timothy Frye, "Is Putin’s popularity real?" Informa UK Limited 33 (33): 1-15, 2016

      40 Baimyrzaeva, M., "Institutional reforms in Kyrgyzstan" 4 (4): 29-33, 2005

      41 National Statistics Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic, "Indeks lichnogo doveriya grazhdanna k gosudarstvu za II kvartal 2013g"

      42 UNDP, "Human development as the focus of local self-governance: National human development report of the Kyrgyz republic" United Nations Development Programme

      43 Grindle, M. S., "Going local: Decentralization, democra tization, and the promise of good governance" Princeton University Press 2007

      44 The World Bank, "FY19 Uzbekistan: Country opinion survey report" The World Bank 2019

      45 Diamond, L., "Developing democracy: Toward consolidation" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

      46 USAID, "Democracy, human rights and governance Assessment of the Kyrgyz republic" 2013

      47 Vetter, A., "Democracy versus efficiency? Comparing local government reforms across Europe" VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 11-28, 2003

      48 UCLG, "Decentralization and local democracy in the world" The World Bank 2008

      49 UNDP, "Decentralised governance for development: A combined practice note on decentralisation" local governance and urban/rural development

      50 Levitsky, S., "Competitive authoritarianism:Hybrid regimes after the cold war" Cambridge University Press 2010

      51 Lucy Earle, "Community development, ‘tradition’ and the civil society strengthening agenda in Central Asia" Informa UK Limited 24 (24): 245-260, 2005

      52 McGlinchey, E., "Chaos, violence, dynasty: Politics and Islam in central Asia" University of Pittsburgh Press 2011

      53 Paul D. Hutchcroft, "Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power" Wiley 14 (14): 23-53, 2001

      54 Olcott, M. B., "Central Asia’s new states: Independence, foreign policy, and regional security" United States Institute of Peace Press 1996

      55 George, A. L., "Case studies and theory development in the social sciences" MIT Press 2005

      56 Mukanova, N., "Assessing ‘new public management’ reforms in Kyrgyzstan" Open Society Institute 2008

      57 Fraser, A., "Aid-recipient sovereignty in historical context" Oxford University Press 45-73, 2009

      58 Snyder, R., "After the state withdraws: Neoliberalism and subnational authoritarian regimes in Mexico" University of California 295-341, 1999

      59 ARIS, "About us"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼