특허출원 공개시기 단축방안 ―현행 18개월 출원공개제도를 16개월 또는 14개월 제도로 변경― = A Proposal to Shorten Patent Publication Period: From Current Eighteen Month Patent Publication System to Sixteen Month or Fourteen Month System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Article 64 of the Korea Patent Act (2021) prescribes the so-called eighteen (18) month publication system, under which a patent application is being laid open eighteen month after the filing date or the priority date. The eighteen month system was settled by considering (1) the priority period (12 months) required by the Paris Covention, (2) the period to alter priority claim (4 months) or the period to file priority certification document (4 months) and (3) publication preparation period (2 months). Based on the fact that the eighteen month period is too long in the current high speed technology development era and that the sooner the publication is, the more beneficial for technology development, this paper researched a method to shorten the current eighteen month period to sixteen or even fourteen month period. This research has made the following results. Firstly, because patent administration in the Korean Intellectual Property Office has been almost 100% automated, publication preparation period need to be only one day. Therefore sixteen month publication is easily possible. Secondly, there is no inevitable reason why alteration of priority claim or filing of priority certification document shall be submitted before publication. In other words, as a claim can be amended after publication, a priority claim can be amended after publication. Because anyone can inspect the file wrapper, the amended content is deemed publicly noticed real time. In that respect, without waiting all sixteen months, we can operate a so-called fourteen month system. Because of the period of fourteen months to submit claim(s) and translated document, it is not possible to further shorten the fourteen months. This paper proclaims that for a faster-paced technology development, we shall introduce a sixteen month publication system or even preferably a fourteen month publication system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강경태, "특허법주해 I" 박영사 2010

2 홍정표, "특허법주해 I" 박영사 2010

3 윤선희, "특허법" 법문사 2007

4 특허청, "특허·실용신안 심사지침서"

5 정차호, "출원공개제도 개선 및 산업계 영향 분석에 관한 연구" 특허청 2020

6 특허청, "정책연구과제 제안요청서, 출원공개제도 개선 및 산업계 영향 분석에 관한 연구"

7 Maurits Dolmans, "The New Technology Transfer Block Exemption Will the New Block Exemption Balance the Goals of Innovation and Competition?" 21 (21): 2003

8 Philippe Signore, "The New Provisional Rights Provision" 82 : 742-, 2000

9 Kami Lammon-Hilinski, "The American Inventors Protection Act: How Should the Courts Treat the "Substantially Identical" Requirement of the New Provisional Rights Statute?" 40 : 667-, 2002

10 Abraham J. Rosner, "Provisional Applications"

11 USPTO, "Provisional Application for Patent"

12 Donald G. Daus, "Paris Convention Priority" 77 : 138-, 1995

13 R Carl Moy, "Moy's Walker on Patents" 14-, 2020

14 William B. Slate, "In Defense of the Misunderstood Provisional Application" 85 : 219-, 2003

15 David M. Treadway, "Has the Supreme Court Forgotten the Patentee? Recent Patent Licensing Decisions Contradict Patent Policy, Harm Licensors, and Alter Negotiation" 33 : 303-, 2008

16 John Paul Baremore, "Don't Shoot the Messenger: Congress and the Prospect of Patent Harmonization" 44 : 761-, 1999

17 Charles A. Eldering, "Comparative Analysis of Provisional Patent Applications Under US and UK Law" 79 : 791-, 1997

18 김인기, "2001-2002년 개정 특허법실용신안법 해설" 대광서림 2003