RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공적자금 상환방법별 사회후생효과 비교

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100407668

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Korean government set out a reimbursement plan for 69 trillion won of public fund. According to the plan, the financial sector is to take responsibility for 20 trillion won for 25 years starting from 2003 and the government finances, 49 trillion w...

      The Korean government set out a reimbursement plan for 69 trillion won of public fund. According to the plan, the financial sector is to take responsibility for 20 trillion won for 25 years starting from 2003 and the government finances, 49 trillion won.
      This study is designed to compare the two reimbursement methods under-mentioned in terms of social welfare effect. The two chosen methods are as follows:
      · 1 Method 1 (current): The government repays at the end of each fiscal year 2 trillion won on present value as of end 2002 as a part of general accounts.
      · 1 Method 2: Fiscal surplus for the 25 years will all be used for reimbursement.
      The differential between the fiscal surplus and 49 trillion won will be repaid annually with the use of general accounts for the 25 years.
      Stochastic simulation was employed as the analysis method. As a result of estimated effect on social welfare comparison by reimbursement method, Method 2 proved to be much more efficient than Method 1.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼