공학캠프를 통한 공학과 기술에 대한 이미지 변화 연구 = The Effect on Images of an Engineering Program Participate toward 'Engineering' and 'Technology' through Semantic Differential Method

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study has a purpose to analyse changes in perception and image about engineering and technology of students who participated in the engineering camp. To achieve this objective, the questions were as follows. 1) What about participants' image difference for engineering before and after participating the engineering camp 2) What about participants' image difference for technology before and after participating the engineering camp. For this study, the program was progressed from Aug in 2017 and the data was collected from 88 students, middle school seniors and high school freshmen. The results of this study were as follows: First, secondary students perceived 'valuable(6.74)', 'meaningful(6.73)', 'rich(6.40)', 'collaborative(6.42)', 'nice(6.22)' as high image rank of the positive response for engineering. On the other hand, 'complex(3.59)', 'labored(3.80)', 'hard(4.66)', 'dangerous(4.48)', 'cold(4.86)' were perceived as low image rank of the negative response for engineering. We can realize that they generally has the image that engineering is valuable, meaningful and nice but also labored, complex and hard. The students who participated in the engineering camp showed the greatest difference in 'complex - simple' and 'dangerous - safe' engineering categories before and after the camp, followed by 'cold - hot', 'labored - easy', and 'hard - soft', respectively. Second, secondary students perceived 'meaningful(6.58)', 'valuable(6.55)', 'wide(6.38)', 'nice(6.37)', 'strong(6.25)' as high image rank of the positive response for technology. On the other hand, 'complex(3.85)', 'labored(3.93)', 'hard(4.62)', 'dangerous(4.72)', 'cold(5.05)' were perceived as low image rank of the negative response for technology. The students who participated in the engineering camp had the big change in 'hard - soft' technology category before and after the camp, followed by 'complex - simple', 'labored - easy', 'theoretical - practical' and 'dangerous - safe', respectively. We can see that the negative images for technology which were complex, labored, dangerous, theoretical was improved with positive image such as simple, easy, safe and practical, after conducting the engineering camp. In conclusion, both image recognitions for engineering and technology have improved after the camp. It means that interesting and entertaining engineering-technology program can boost interests in engineering and technology which felt difficult, so that images about them can be turned out positive. Also, it is possible to reduce avoidance of natural science and engineering subjects, as part of the purpose of training creative talents in science and engineering, so it can be said that the engineering camp is highly meaningful because it can lead students into the field of science and engineering.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 류영현, "한국의 국가이미지 제고활동 현황과 인식에 관한 연구" 충남대학교 교육대학원 2005

2 김기수, "초․중등교육에서의 공학교육에 대한 공학전문가들의 인식 연구" 대한공업교육학회 38 (38): 136-155, 2013

3 김영훈, "중학생이 인식하는 마이스터 고등학교의 이미지 분석" 충남대학교 교육대학원 2013

4 김용익, "중학교 학생들에게 형성되어 있는 실과교과의 이미지 분석" 한국농·산업교육학회 34 (34): 97-116, 2002

5 이윤희, "이미지 문명(Civilization of the Image)에 대한 사회학적 고찰 : 미셜 마페졸리(M. Maffesoli)의 탈근대성 논의를 중심으로" 서강대학교 대학원 2002

6 최유현, "의미분별법에 의한 초등학교 교사의 발명에 대한 이미지" 한국실과교육연구학회 15 (15): 161-182, 2009

7 김종승, "의미분별법에 의한 초등학교 교사의 ‘공학, 기술, 실과’에 대한 이미지 연구" 한국실과교육연구학회 18 (18): 23-43, 2012

8 염성원, "의미분별법에 의한 중·고등학생의 기술교과에 대한 이미지" 7 (7): 98-143, 2003

9 김기수, "의미분별법에 의한 공업계 고등학생의 ‘공학’에 대한 이미지 연구" 대한공업교육학회 35 (35): 25-42, 2010

10 김이슬, "교육프로그램 참가자 만족도 조사로 본 국립과천과학관의 비형식 과학교육프로그램 운영 방향 연구" 과학교육연구소 34 (34): 279-290, 2010

11 박도순, "교육연구방법론" 교육문화사 2001

12 김영민, "과학 영재 학생들의 공학에 대한 이미지와 인식 분석" 한국영재학회 25 (25): 95-117, 2015

13 임나영, "공학캠프가 청소년의이공계진로 선택에 미치는 영향 분석" 20 : 2016

14 Osgood, C. E., "The Mesurement of Meaning" Univ. of Illinois Press 1957

15 National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council, "Standards for k-12Engineering Education?" The National Academies Press 2010

16 J. -J Wunenburger, "Philosophie des images" Presses universitaires de France 1997

17 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, "PISA 2015 Results in focus" OECD 2016

18 교육부, "OECD, 학업성취도 국제 비교 연구(PISA 2015)결과 발표"