부산시 1인가구 분포 및 주거환경평가분석 = (A) study on the distribution and residential environment evaluation of one-person households in Busan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The number of one-person households has increased rapidly owing to practical values, individualism and late marriage. Such tendencies are expected to go on. As such, living alone is no longer exceptional or special these days. Accordingly, more attention need be paid to one-person households. Yet, support or housing policy for financially disadvantaged one-person households is insufficient.
This study attempts to present directions for housing planning through residential environmental assessment by analyzing statistical data and results of questionnaire survey on one-person households in Pusan.
The analysis has found the following:
One-person households in Busan are distributed around CBD area, universities and metro lines as in Seoul. The density of single-person households is high in areas where residential and non-residential housings are mixed, far from pleasant residential environment. The cluster analysis on areas where single-person households account for over 50% results in five types of area: the central district area, subway area, university area, factory area and dormitory.
Older single persons tend to live in apartment houses and office-tel buildings, so do the highly educated ones. A high proportion of youths in their 20s whose financial base is weak pay monthly rents or lump-sum deposits, while home ownership increases among those who are in their 30s.
Income and occupant space are positively correlated. As for traffic, residential satisfaction level is relatively low. The younger the age of respondents, the higher the satisfaction level. Particularly, western district shows a relatively lower satisfaction level, and except the proximity to schools and workplace, other factors are not statistically significant. The lower the educational background, the lower the overall satisfaction level.
Respondents prefer Haewoondaigu and Pusanjingu as residential areas to other districts mainly for traffic convenience and proximity to schools and workplace. Office-tel buildings and apartment houses are preferred residential types to other housings, indicating one-person households value convenience of living.
In terms of factors to be considered in housing supply for one-person households, respondents view that welfare facilities, rest zones and green landscape facilities should be taken into further consideration. Youths in their 20s show higher level of importance in each factor compared to other age groups. The more highly educated the respondents are, the more they value the importance of each factor.
The results of IPA (Importance Performance Analysis) according to factor showed that people in their twenties consider housing price, internal structure and housing facilities, parking spaces, rest spaces, and protection of individual privacy categories that need major improvements. People in their thirties picked out convenience facilities, education facilities, medical facilities, welfare facilities and sports facilities as areas that require focused improvements, while people in their forties selected housing size, natural environment and medical facilities, and people in their fifties picked out housing size, natural environment, welfare facilities, and greenery and landscape.
Based on the findings here, the following directions for housing plan for one-person households are suggested here.
First, housing supply need be based on accurate market demand, which differs depending on age groups, districts and educational backgrounds.
Second, residential environment needs developing by taking into account safety, health and amenities as well as convenience. In particular, safety is important for females.
Third, current urban-type living housing needs improving by making up for unfavorable aspects.
Lastly, macroscopic perspectives considering demographic structural changes need be taken to approach one-person households. As the process of their decision making on residential location may become important in urban planning, relevant studies are necessary.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 제1절 연구 배경과 목적 1
• 제2절 연구 범위와 방법 3
• 제2장 이론적 고찰 및 선행연구 5
• 제1절1인가구에 대한 이론적 고찰 5
• 1.1인가구의 이해 5
• 2.국내외 1인가구 증가추이와 특성 8
• 3.1인가구 관련 주요정책 16
• 제2절 주거관련이론 검토 20
• 제3절 선행연구 검토 22
• 제3장 부산시1인가구 현황 및 특성분석 26
• 제1절 부산시1인가구 현황 및 분포 26
• 1. 부산시1인가구 현황 26
• 2. 부산시1인가구 분포 및 특성 28
• 3. 부산시1인가구 관련 지원정책 31
• 제2절 부산시1인가구 밀집지역 유형분류 및 특성분석 32
• 1. 부산시1인가구 밀집지역 유형분류 32
• 2. 부산시1인가구 유형별 밀집지역 특성분석 35
• 제4장 부산시1인가구 주거환경평가분석 38
• 제1절 자료현황 및 분석방법 38
• 1. 자료의 일반적 사항 38
• 2. 자료의 분석방법 41
• 제2절1인가구 주거환경실태분석 42
• 1.1인가구 주거환경과 실태 42
• 2.1인가구 주거만족도분석 48
• 제3절1인가구 주거환경평가분석 57
• 1.1인가구 주거선호지역 및 성향분석 57
• 2.1인가구 주거중요도분석 66
• 3. 요인별 IPA분석 74
• 제5장 요약 및 결론 80
• *참고문헌 83
• *부록 [설문지] 85
• *Abstract 90