RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)을 이용한 동통평가의 유용성 = Assessment of the Spinal Pain Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19723400

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In spine injury pain is the overwhelming indicator for treatment. Despite of its widespread prevalence, objective data assessing the pain and the results of various forms of treatment are largely lacking in Korea. In order to compare the value of dif...

      In spine injury pain is the overwhelming indicator for treatment. Despite of its widespread prevalence, objective data assessing the pain and the results of various forms of treatment are largely lacking in Korea. In order to compare the value of different types of treatment, it is necessary to develop standardized and meaningful forms of assessment.
      Thirty-nine patients with a diagnosis of spinal stenosis, spodylolisthesis or herniated disc entered the study. Mean age was 48 ranged from 24 to 71. An initial questionnaire was developed by adoption of the Million's Pain Score. Each question was answered by patients. Marking on a Visual Analogue Scale and repeated one bour later. Statistical analysis using SPSS(V3.2) was performed for reproducibility of the questionnaire. The questions shown unsatisfactory degree of agreement (a correlation less than 0.7) were replaced with new questions seeking similar information but designed to produce less confusion than its predecessor. The revised questionnaires were asked and analyzed in same manner as the previous procedure.
      With initial questionnaire, the mean scores did not show significant difference between the answers of the first visit and the second. The overall degree of agreement was 0.7720. Questions 4. 5. 6 and 12, however, showed unsatisfactory degree of agreement. With revised questionnaire, the mean scores had no significant difference between the answers of the first visit and the second. The overall degree of agreement was improved to 0.8878. All questions showed satisfactory dcgree of agrccment.
      This questionnaire is thought to be helpful to assess patient's subjective symptoms, and analyze and compare the results of various forms of treatments. Although satisfactory, there is still room for some further improvement.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼