RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Preoperative Nodal 18F-FDG Avidity Rather than Primary Tumor Avidity Determines the Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105905493

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This study investigated whether the metabolic avidity of primary tumors and/or metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was related to survival after s...

      Purpose: This study investigated whether the metabolic avidity of primary tumors and/or metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was related to survival after surgery in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
      Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty-eight patients with AGC who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and curative resection were included. The 18F-FDG avidity of the primary gastric tumor and LNs was determined quantitatively and qualitatively. The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT was calculated, and the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG avidity for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed.
      Results: In all, 51 (30.4%) patients experienced recurrence, and 32 (19.0%) died during follow-up (median follow-up duration, 35 months; range, 3–81 months); 119 (70.8%) and 33 (19.6%) patients showed 18F-FDG-avid primary tumors and LNs, respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed high sensitivity (73.8%) for the detection of advanced pathologic T (pT ≥3) stage and high specificity (92.2%) for the detection of advanced pN (≥2) stage. 18F-FDG avidity of LNs was significantly associated with RFS (P=0.012), whereas that of primary tumors did not show significance (P=0.532). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that 18F-FDG avidity of LNs was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (hazard ratio=2.068; P=0.029).
      Conclusions: 18F-FDG avidity of LNs is an independent prognostic factor for predicting RFS. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used to determine the risk and prognosis of patients with AGC after curative resection.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kim EY, "The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT" 79 : 183-188, 2011

      2 Abbas M, "The relevance of gastric cancer biomarkers in prognosis and pre- and post- chemotherapy in clinical practice" 95 : 1082-1090, 2017

      3 Songun I, "Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15- year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial" 11 : 439-449, 2010

      4 Lee JW, "Role of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of gastric cancer recurrence after curative surgical resection" 39 : 1425-1434, 2012

      5 Lee JW, "Relationship between $^{18}F$-FDG uptake on PET and recurrence patterns after curative surgical resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer" 56 : 1494-1500, 2015

      6 Cerfolio RJ, "Ratio of the maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET of the mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes to the primary tumor may be a universal predictor of nodal malignancy in patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer" 83 : 1826-1830, 2007

      7 김정훈, "Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Progression-Free Survival in Gastric Cancer" 대한핵의학회 48 (48): 33-40, 2014

      8 Song BI, "Preoperative standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes measured by $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer" 94 : e1037-, 2015

      9 김세훈, "Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography" 대한위암학회 13 (13): 149-156, 2013

      10 Maehara Y, "Postoperative outcome and sites of recurrence in patients following curative resection of gastric cancer" 87 : 353-357, 2000

      1 Kim EY, "The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT" 79 : 183-188, 2011

      2 Abbas M, "The relevance of gastric cancer biomarkers in prognosis and pre- and post- chemotherapy in clinical practice" 95 : 1082-1090, 2017

      3 Songun I, "Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15- year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial" 11 : 439-449, 2010

      4 Lee JW, "Role of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of gastric cancer recurrence after curative surgical resection" 39 : 1425-1434, 2012

      5 Lee JW, "Relationship between $^{18}F$-FDG uptake on PET and recurrence patterns after curative surgical resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer" 56 : 1494-1500, 2015

      6 Cerfolio RJ, "Ratio of the maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET of the mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes to the primary tumor may be a universal predictor of nodal malignancy in patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer" 83 : 1826-1830, 2007

      7 김정훈, "Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Progression-Free Survival in Gastric Cancer" 대한핵의학회 48 (48): 33-40, 2014

      8 Song BI, "Preoperative standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes measured by $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer" 94 : e1037-, 2015

      9 김세훈, "Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography" 대한위암학회 13 (13): 149-156, 2013

      10 Maehara Y, "Postoperative outcome and sites of recurrence in patients following curative resection of gastric cancer" 87 : 353-357, 2000

      11 Soret M, "Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging" 48 : 932-945, 2007

      12 Lordick F, "PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial" 8 : 797-805, 2007

      13 Ajani JA, "Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial" 28 : 1547-1553, 2010

      14 Coupe NA, "Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer" 28 : 128-135, 2014

      15 Ott K, "Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction" 24 : 4692-4698, 2006

      16 Park J, "Lymph node to primary tumor SUV ratio by $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT and the prediction of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer" 39 : e249-e253, 2014

      17 Yun M, "Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using $^{18}F$-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT" 46 : 1582-1588, 2005

      18 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, "Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition" 14 : 101-112, 2011

      19 Hwang SW, "Is endoscopic ultrasonography still the modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer?" 20 : 13775-13782, 2014

      20 Dulak AM, "Gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, stomach, and colon exhibit distinct patterns of genome instability and oncogenesis" 72 : 4383-4393, 2012

      21 Smyth EC, "Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up" 27 : v38-v49, 2016

      22 Ajani JA, "Gastric cancer, version 3.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology" 14 : 1286-1312, 2016

      23 Baiocchi GL, "Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: an appraisal of the Italian research group for gastric cancer" 21 : 2005-2011, 2014

      24 Stahl A, "FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings" 30 : 288-295, 2003

      25 Mochiki E, "Evaluation of $^{18}F$-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer" 28 : 247-253, 2004

      26 Ahn HS, "Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer" 99 : 20-27, 2009

      27 Ichikura T, "Comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage based on their location in patients with gastric cancer" 11 : 1894-1900, 1993

      28 Deng JY, "Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer" 20 : 3967-3975, 2014

      29 Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2016" 66 : 7-30, 2016

      30 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2014" 대한암학회 49 (49): 292-305, 2017

      31 Kim SK, "Assessment of lymph node metastases using $^{18}F$-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer" 33 : 148-155, 2006

      32 Katanoda K, "An updated report on the trends in cancer incidence and mortality in Japan, 1958-2013" 45 : 390-401, 2015

      33 Sakuramoto S, "Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine" 357 : 1810-1820, 2007

      34 Sarela AI, "Accurate lymph node staging is of greater prognostic importance than subclassification of the T2 category for gastric adenocarcinoma" 10 : 783-791, 2003

      35 Smyth E, "A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[$^{18}F$]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer" 118 : 5481-5488, 2012

      36 Deng N, "A comprehensive survey of genomic alterations in gastric cancer reveals systematic patterns of molecular exclusivity and co-occurrence among distinct therapeutic targets" 61 : 673-684, 2012

      37 Washington K, "7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach" 17 : 3077-3079, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-05-01 평가 SCIE 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2015-07-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한위암학회지 -> Journal of Gastric Cancer KCI등재
      2015-07-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Gastric Cancer Association -> Journal of Gastric Cancer KCI등재
      2013-11-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.46 0.24 0.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.37 0.461 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼