RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      승용차용 시트 패드와 일체 발포 가능한 통풍 유로 키트의 유동 실험 및 해석에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108976258

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examined the ventilation flow kit for automotive seats, one of the key components of automotive interior comfort technology. The research focuses on improving the performance of the existing Plenum-type airflow system with a new ventilation...

      This study examined the ventilation flow kit for automotive seats, one of the key components of automotive interior comfort technology. The research focuses on improving the performance of the existing Plenum-type airflow system with a new ventilation flow research model. The new research model simplifies the shape of the airflow path compared to the existing product, reducing air turbulence during flow. Simultaneously, embossing is applied to the lower surface of the airflow path to generate a swirling motion of mixed air inside, achieving a uniform airflow velocity at each ventilation outlet. The existing product and the research model were designed, and fluid dynamics analysis was conducted to validate the performance improvement of the improved research model. Prototypes were also manufactured and subjected to performance evaluation tests. Fluid dynamics analysis showed that the average airflow velocity at the ventilation outlets was 2.88 m/s for the existing product, whereas the research model achieved an average velocity of 6.22 m/s, representing an approximate 116 % improvement in performance compared to the existing product. Furthermore, the uniformity of airflow velocity was enhanced by approximately 195 %. The performance testing results indicated that the existing product exhibited an average airflow velocity of 2.76 m/s, whereas the research model demonstrated an average velocity of 5.41 m/s, resulting in 96.01 % performance improvement.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼