RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      China’s Anti-Access Strategy versus the US’s Air-Sea Battle Concept: Implications for the Korean Peninsula and East Asian Security

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103845534

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      By comparing the balancing strategies ‘Anti-Access’ and ‘Air-Sea Battle,’ this paper approaches the implications for the Korean Peninsula and East Asian security. China's active defense strategy proceeding to power transition in East Asia has been evaluated to cause the US's strong responses to mobilize military and diplomatic countermeasures, namely 'Pivot to Asia.' In this context, to maintain peace and the status quo, regional countries should participate in the appropriate control of the "Shared Regional Hegemony" which means neither accepting too much of China's assertion nor agreeing to excessive military strategies of the US. To reduce the impact of the two rival strategies, as a supporting or coordinating actor, the Republic of Korea (ROK) must properly utilize 'ROK-US-China' and 'ROK-US-Japan' triangles based on the ROK-US alliance, while she has to pursue unilateral initiatives and invite reciprocation of North Korea as a long-term strategy for cooperation. Finally, to prevent regional conflicts, regional states should establish a legally binding mechanism. The legally binding mechanism needs to pursue a middle course between the regional alliance and the multilateral security cooperation system to control the two giants’ (the US and China) unilateralism, as a kind of collective security system in East Asia.
      번역하기

      By comparing the balancing strategies ‘Anti-Access’ and ‘Air-Sea Battle,’ this paper approaches the implications for the Korean Peninsula and East Asian security. China's active defense strategy proceeding to power transition in East Asia has ...

      By comparing the balancing strategies ‘Anti-Access’ and ‘Air-Sea Battle,’ this paper approaches the implications for the Korean Peninsula and East Asian security. China's active defense strategy proceeding to power transition in East Asia has been evaluated to cause the US's strong responses to mobilize military and diplomatic countermeasures, namely 'Pivot to Asia.' In this context, to maintain peace and the status quo, regional countries should participate in the appropriate control of the "Shared Regional Hegemony" which means neither accepting too much of China's assertion nor agreeing to excessive military strategies of the US. To reduce the impact of the two rival strategies, as a supporting or coordinating actor, the Republic of Korea (ROK) must properly utilize 'ROK-US-China' and 'ROK-US-Japan' triangles based on the ROK-US alliance, while she has to pursue unilateral initiatives and invite reciprocation of North Korea as a long-term strategy for cooperation. Finally, to prevent regional conflicts, regional states should establish a legally binding mechanism. The legally binding mechanism needs to pursue a middle course between the regional alliance and the multilateral security cooperation system to control the two giants’ (the US and China) unilateralism, as a kind of collective security system in East Asia.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이원우, "남중국해 분쟁의 쟁점과 안보적 함의: 국제법과 실효적 지배 중심으로" 한국의정연구회 7 (7): 175-202, 2012

      2 Organski, A.F.K., "World Politics" Alfred A. Knopf 1958

      3 LarryA.NIKSCH, "When north Korea Mounts nuclear Warheads on Its MIssIles" 국가안보전략연구원 25 (25): 1-20, 2011

      4 Lieber, Keir A., "Waiting for Balancing: Why the World Is Not Pushing Back" 30 (30): 2005

      5 Stedman, Stephen John, "UN Transformation in an Era of Soft Balancing, In Cooperating for peace and security: evolving institutions and arrangements in a context of changing U.S. security policy" Cambridge University Press 2010

      6 Karklis, Laris, "U.S. military expansion in Southeast Asia" The Washington Post

      7 US Department of Commerce, "Trade in Goods with China"

      8 Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" Waveland Press 1979

      9 Kwon, Tae Hwan, "The revised Japanese National Defense Program Outline" 2011

      10 Rogan, Rosh, "The end of the concept of ‘strategic reassurance’?" Foreign Policy

      1 이원우, "남중국해 분쟁의 쟁점과 안보적 함의: 국제법과 실효적 지배 중심으로" 한국의정연구회 7 (7): 175-202, 2012

      2 Organski, A.F.K., "World Politics" Alfred A. Knopf 1958

      3 LarryA.NIKSCH, "When north Korea Mounts nuclear Warheads on Its MIssIles" 국가안보전략연구원 25 (25): 1-20, 2011

      4 Lieber, Keir A., "Waiting for Balancing: Why the World Is Not Pushing Back" 30 (30): 2005

      5 Stedman, Stephen John, "UN Transformation in an Era of Soft Balancing, In Cooperating for peace and security: evolving institutions and arrangements in a context of changing U.S. security policy" Cambridge University Press 2010

      6 Karklis, Laris, "U.S. military expansion in Southeast Asia" The Washington Post

      7 US Department of Commerce, "Trade in Goods with China"

      8 Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" Waveland Press 1979

      9 Kwon, Tae Hwan, "The revised Japanese National Defense Program Outline" 2011

      10 Rogan, Rosh, "The end of the concept of ‘strategic reassurance’?" Foreign Policy

      11 Park, Jae Jeok, "The US-led alliances in the Asia-Pacific: hedge against potential threats or an undesirable multilateral security order?" 24 (24): 2011

      12 Armitage Richard L., "The US-Japan Alliance: Anchoring Stability in Asia" CSIS 2012

      13 Panetta, Leon, "The US Rebalance towards the Asia-Pacific"

      14 Renato Cruz De Castro, "The Risk of Applying Realpolitik in Resolving the South China Sea Dispute: Implications on Regional Security" 국제관계연구소 27 (27): 262-289, 2012

      15 Masters, Jonathan, "The Pentagon Pivots to Asia" Council on Foreign Relations

      16 Walt, Stephen M., "The Origins of Alliances" Cornell University Press 1987

      17 Walt, Stephen M., "The Northeast Asian Security Environment are changing abruptly… The time will come for South Korea to choose either the US and China"

      18 Lee, Wonwoo, "The Need for Strengthening the US-China Relations: Focusing on the ‘Pivot to Asia" Inha University 2012

      19 Dooley, Howard J., "The Great Leap Outward: China’s Maritime Renaissance" 26 (26): 2012

      20 Kaplan, Robert D., "The Geography of Chinese Power" 89 (89): 2010

      21 Wortzel, Larry M., "The Chinese People’s Liberation Army and Space Warfare: Emerging United States-China Military Competition"

      22 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, "Strategic Vision" Basic Books 2012

      23 KITA (Korea International Trade Association), "Statistics & Report"

      24 Lohman, Walter, "Sorting American Priorities in the South China Sea" 2011

      25 Pape, Robert A., "Soft balancing against the United States" 30 (30): 2005

      26 Paul, T. V., "Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy" 30 (30): 2005

      27 Ahn, Byung-joon, "Shifts in American Grand Strategy and the Future of the Korean Peninsula" 48 (48): 2009

      28 Carter, Ashton B., "Remarks at National Press Club, United States Department of Defense"

      29 Buzan, Barry, "Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security" Cambridge University Press 2004

      30 유현석, "Regional Institution and Institutional Balancing: The Case of the East Asian Summit" 신아시아연구소 17 (17): 73-95, 2010

      31 Brooks, Stephen G., "Realism, Balance-of-Threat Theory, and the ‘Soft Balancing’ Constraint, In World out of balance: international relations and the challenge of American primacy" Princeton University Press 2008

      32 Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review Report (QDR)" 2010

      33 IMF, "List of countries by past and future GDP (nominal)"

      34 Lee, Tai Hwan, "Korea’s New Diplomacy in the Era of US-China, Peace in the Korean Peninsula and Cooperation in East Asia: Opportunities and Challenges" 2012

      35 Department of Defense, "Joint Operational Access Concept (JOAC)" 2011

      36 Brooks, Stephen G., "Hard Times for Soft Balancing" 30 (30): 2005

      37 Bright, "Global defense spending dips for first time in 15 years. The Christian Science Monitor"

      38 Art, Robert J., "Geopolitics Updated: The Strategy of Selective Engagement" International Security 1998

      39 AP, "First 200 US Marines arrive in northern Australia where joint training hub is taking shape"

      40 Brimley, Shawn, "Finding Our Way, In Finding Our Way: Debating American Grand Strategy" Center for a New American Security 2008

      41 Posen, Barry R., "Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy" 21 (21): 1996

      42 Hoyos, Carola, "Chinese defense budget set to double by 2015" Financial Times

      43 앤드류 양, "China’s Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA): Transforming the PLA by Feeling Stones in the Riverbed" 한국전략문제연구소 15 (15): 33-57, 2008

      44 Williamson, Clarence E., "China’s Grand Strategy in the 21st Century: A United States Perspective" Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy 12 (12): 2009

      45 Cheng, Dean, "China’s Active Defense Strategy and Its Regional Impact" The Heritage Foundation 2011

      46 Chase, Michael S., "China assesses President Obama’s November 2011 Asia-Pacific Trip" 11 (11): 2011

      47 Gill, Bates, "China as a Responsible Stakeholder" Carnegie Endowment

      48 스인홍, "China and the United States in East Asia: Dynamics of Contending" 한국전략문제연구소 19 (19): 61-83, 2012

      49 Kim, Byung-Kook, "Between China, America, and North Korea: South Korea’s Hedging, In China’s Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics" Cornell University Press 2008

      50 Seth, Sushil P., "Australia’s partnership dilemma: China or U.S"

      51 Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2013" 2013

      52 Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2012" 2012

      53 Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2011" 2011

      54 Clinton, Hillary Rodham, "America’s Pacific Century" 2011

      55 Tol, Jan Van, "AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept" CSBA (Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments) 2010

      56 Halloran, Richard, "AirSea Battle" Air Force Magazine 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.96 0.96 0.86
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.77 1.246 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼