Future of breast elastography

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Both strain elastography and shear wave elastography have been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for characterizing breast lesions as benign or malignant. Training is important for both strain and shear wave elastography. The unique feature of benign lesions measuring smaller on elastography than B-mode imaging and malignant lesions appearing larger on elastography is an important feature for characterization of breast masses. There are several artifacts which can contain diagnostic information or alert to technique problems. Both strain and shear wave elastography continue to have improvements and new techniques will soon be available for clinical use that may provide additional diagnostic information. This paper reviews the present state of breast elastography and discusses future techniques that are not yet in clinical practice

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Barr RG, "WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast" 41 : 1148-1160, 2015

2 Shiina T, "WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology" 41 : 1126-1147, 2015

3 Bai M, "Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses" 31 : 289-294, 2012

4 Raza S, "Using realtime tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience" 29 : 551-563, 2010

5 Hudert CA, "US time-harmonic elastography: detection of liver fibrosis in adolescents with extreme obesity with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" 288 : 99-106, 2018

6 Barr RG, "The utility of the "bull's-eye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate" 27 : 151-155, 2011

7 Grajo JR, "Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades" 33 : 129-134, 2014

8 Sousaris N, "Sonographic elastography of mastitis" 35 : 1791-1797, 2016

9 Barr RG, "Sonographic breast elastography: a primer" 31 : 773-783, 2012

10 Sousaris N, "Sonoelastography of breast lymphoma" 32 : 208-211, 2016

11 Thomas A, "Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography" 17 : 558-563, 2010

12 Barr RG, "Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography" 275 : 45-53, 2015

13 육지현, "Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art" 대한초음파의학회 36 (36): 300-309, 2017

14 Berg WA, "Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses" 262 : 435-449, 2012

15 Alhabshi SM, "Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions" 39 : 568-578, 2013

16 Barr RG, "Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results" 26 : 61-66, 2010

17 Tanter M, "Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging" 34 : 1373-1386, 2008

18 Ueno E, "New quantitative method in breast elastography: fat lesion ratio (FLR)" 2007

19 Nikolov SI, "Iterative autocorrelation motion estimation with application to elasticity imaging" 2013

20 Hall TJ, "In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging" 29 : 427-435, 2003

21 MacSween RN, "Histologic spectrum of alcoholic liver disease" 6 : 221-232, 1986

22 Yang WT, "Exploring the negative likelihood ratio and how it can be used to minimize falsepositives in breast imaging" 210 : 301-306, 2018

23 Barr RG, "Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial" 31 : 281-287, 2012

24 Krouskop TA, "Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression" 20 : 260-274, 1998

25 Barr RG, "Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment" 31 : 895-902, 2012

26 Frank DN, "Disease phenotype and genotype are associated with shifts in intestinal-associated microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases" 17 : 179-184, 2011

27 Stachs A, "Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses:factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio" 34 : 131-136, 2013

28 Farrokh A, "Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions" 32 : 400-405, 2011

29 Barr RG, "Diagnostic performance and accuracy of the 3 interpreting methods of breast strain elastography: a systematic review and meta-analysis" 2018

30 Ueno E, "Diagnosis of breast cancer by elasticity imaging" 36 : 2-6, 2004

31 Chang JM, "Breast mass evaluation:factors influencing the quality of US elastography" 259 : 59-64, 2011

32 Barr RG, "Breast elastography" Thieme Publishers 2014

33 Itoh A, "Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis" 239 : 341-350, 2006

34 Hendriks GA, "Automated 3D ultrasound elastography of the breast: a phantom validation study" 61 : 2665-2679, 2016

35 Tian J, "Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses" 7 : 41216-, 2017

36 Neuschler EI, "A pivotal study of optoacoustic imaging to diagnose benign and malignant breast masses: a new evaluation tool for radiologists" 287 : 398-412, 2018