RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국의 이혼법에 관한 연구 = A Study on American Divorce Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75026342

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Divorce is the legal termination of a marriage in the United States. But in some states, divorce is called dissolution or dissolution of marriage. A divorce or dissolution servers a marriage. This discussion refers to civil annulments; within the Roman Catholic Church, a couple may obtain a religious annulment after obtaining a civil divorce, in order for one or both spouses to remarry.
      It has now been more forty years since California, in late 1960s, launched the modern-day reform movement in divorce laws by adoption the first no-fault divorce law in the United States and eliminating the concept of fault in marriage dissolution actions. The no-fault movement was premised on the idea that the removal of fault as a basis for divorce would significantly reduce the amount of personal animosity and bitterness typically associated with divorce. While the actual terminology of no-fault grounds may vary from state to state, they share a common theoretical basis allowing for the dissolution of marriages deemed no longer viable, regardless of cause, rather than requiring that dissolution be granted only if based on the fault of one of the parties.
      Following California's lead, in August, 1970, the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) was proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, recommending that the sole ground for divorce should be a finding of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. Delays in obtaining an endorsement of the UMDA by the American Bar Association meant that states eager to reform their divorce laws to the California legislation or early versions of the UMDA for guidance.
      The focus of this article is to examine the historical development and current status of one particular no-fault divorce issue associated with the dissolution of a marriage. A comparison of approach to no-fault divorce law in the United States with fault divorce law in the Korea should highlight the debate on these important issues of public policy.
      번역하기

      Divorce is the legal termination of a marriage in the United States. But in some states, divorce is called dissolution or dissolution of marriage. A divorce or dissolution servers a marriage. This discussion refers to civil annulments; within the Roma...

      Divorce is the legal termination of a marriage in the United States. But in some states, divorce is called dissolution or dissolution of marriage. A divorce or dissolution servers a marriage. This discussion refers to civil annulments; within the Roman Catholic Church, a couple may obtain a religious annulment after obtaining a civil divorce, in order for one or both spouses to remarry.
      It has now been more forty years since California, in late 1960s, launched the modern-day reform movement in divorce laws by adoption the first no-fault divorce law in the United States and eliminating the concept of fault in marriage dissolution actions. The no-fault movement was premised on the idea that the removal of fault as a basis for divorce would significantly reduce the amount of personal animosity and bitterness typically associated with divorce. While the actual terminology of no-fault grounds may vary from state to state, they share a common theoretical basis allowing for the dissolution of marriages deemed no longer viable, regardless of cause, rather than requiring that dissolution be granted only if based on the fault of one of the parties.
      Following California's lead, in August, 1970, the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) was proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, recommending that the sole ground for divorce should be a finding of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. Delays in obtaining an endorsement of the UMDA by the American Bar Association meant that states eager to reform their divorce laws to the California legislation or early versions of the UMDA for guidance.
      The focus of this article is to examine the historical development and current status of one particular no-fault divorce issue associated with the dissolution of a marriage. A comparison of approach to no-fault divorce law in the United States with fault divorce law in the Korea should highlight the debate on these important issues of public policy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이혼의 유형
      • Ⅲ. 이혼의 성립요건
      • Ⅳ. 이혼의 법률효과
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이혼의 유형
      • Ⅲ. 이혼의 성립요건
      • Ⅳ. 이혼의 법률효과
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼