RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Reading Test-taking Strategy Awareness and Strategy Use of EFL College Students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105037111

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The study examined whether there are some differences and how close the relationship between reading test-taking strategy awareness and strategy use of EFL college students across their English proficiency levels. Participants of the study were 57 students, 28 of whom were taking a TOEIC preparation course and received SBI(Strategy-based Instruction) during the course. As a comparison group, the rest of them are English education majors who have a higher level of English proficiency. The findings of the study showed that the less proficient students demonstrated a lower level of strategy awareness and strategy use over reasoning, guessing and managing strategy, even though trained and prepared for reading test situations through SBI. The more proficient students were likely to use reading test-taking strategies contributory to reading comprehension more frequently. Moreover, the more proficient group demonstrated a closer relationship between strategy awareness and strategy use than the less proficient group. The study suggests that strategy instruction be more focused on contributory strategies related with language learning.
      번역하기

      The study examined whether there are some differences and how close the relationship between reading test-taking strategy awareness and strategy use of EFL college students across their English proficiency levels. Participants of the study were 57 stu...

      The study examined whether there are some differences and how close the relationship between reading test-taking strategy awareness and strategy use of EFL college students across their English proficiency levels. Participants of the study were 57 students, 28 of whom were taking a TOEIC preparation course and received SBI(Strategy-based Instruction) during the course. As a comparison group, the rest of them are English education majors who have a higher level of English proficiency. The findings of the study showed that the less proficient students demonstrated a lower level of strategy awareness and strategy use over reasoning, guessing and managing strategy, even though trained and prepared for reading test situations through SBI. The more proficient students were likely to use reading test-taking strategies contributory to reading comprehension more frequently. Moreover, the more proficient group demonstrated a closer relationship between strategy awareness and strategy use than the less proficient group. The study suggests that strategy instruction be more focused on contributory strategies related with language learning.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 나경희, "한국 대학생들의 영어독해전략 활용 및 활용에 따른독해능력과의 상관관계분석" 한국현대영어영문학회 52 (52): 91-114, 2008

      2 황선유, "토익기반 독해수업을 통해 나타난 독해전략과 시험전략의 변화" 신영어영문학회 (62) : 293-315, 2015

      3 정지원, "영어 독해 전략 지도가 학습자 독해 성취도 향상과 메타인지 전략 사용에 미친 영향" 한국외국어교육학회 20 (20): 79-104, 2013

      4 박찬규, "언어 학습전략 사용의 변화와 학업 성취도" 한국중원언어학회 (18) : 23-47, 2010

      5 변지현, "교양영어 읽기전략 훈련의 효과분석" 한국교양교육학회 6 (6): 207-241, 2012

      6 Rubin, J., "What the Good Language Learner Can Teach Us" 9 (9): 41-51, 1975

      7 Stern, H. H., "What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner?" 31 : 304-318, 1975

      8 맹은경, "The Effectiveness of Reading Strategy Instruction: A Meta-Analysis" 한국영어교육학회 69 (69): 105-127, 2014

      9 Chamot, A. U., "The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A Bridge to the Mainstream" 21 (21): 227-249, 1987

      10 Paris, S., "The Benefits of Informed Instruction of Children’s Reading Awareness and Comprehension Skills" 55 : 2083-2093, 1984

      1 나경희, "한국 대학생들의 영어독해전략 활용 및 활용에 따른독해능력과의 상관관계분석" 한국현대영어영문학회 52 (52): 91-114, 2008

      2 황선유, "토익기반 독해수업을 통해 나타난 독해전략과 시험전략의 변화" 신영어영문학회 (62) : 293-315, 2015

      3 정지원, "영어 독해 전략 지도가 학습자 독해 성취도 향상과 메타인지 전략 사용에 미친 영향" 한국외국어교육학회 20 (20): 79-104, 2013

      4 박찬규, "언어 학습전략 사용의 변화와 학업 성취도" 한국중원언어학회 (18) : 23-47, 2010

      5 변지현, "교양영어 읽기전략 훈련의 효과분석" 한국교양교육학회 6 (6): 207-241, 2012

      6 Rubin, J., "What the Good Language Learner Can Teach Us" 9 (9): 41-51, 1975

      7 Stern, H. H., "What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner?" 31 : 304-318, 1975

      8 맹은경, "The Effectiveness of Reading Strategy Instruction: A Meta-Analysis" 한국영어교육학회 69 (69): 105-127, 2014

      9 Chamot, A. U., "The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A Bridge to the Mainstream" 21 (21): 227-249, 1987

      10 Paris, S., "The Benefits of Informed Instruction of Children’s Reading Awareness and Comprehension Skills" 55 : 2083-2093, 1984

      11 Nevo, N., "Test-taking Strategies on a Multiple-choice Test of Reading Comprehension" 6 (6): 199-215, 1989

      12 Brown, D., "Teaching by Principles" Pearson Longman 2007

      13 Barnett, M. A., "Teaching Reading Strategies: How Methodology Affects Language Course Articulation" 21 (21): 109-119, 1998

      14 Kletzien, S. B., "Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing level" 26 : 67-86, 1991

      15 Oxford, R., "Strategy Training for Language Learners: Six Situational Case Studies and a Training Model" 22 (22): 197-216, 1990

      16 Cohen, A. D., "Some Uses of Mentalistic Data in Second Language Research" 31 (31): 285-314, 1981

      17 Kern, R., "Second Language Reading Strategy Training: A Critical Perspective" 1997

      18 Nunan, D., "Practical English Language Teaching" McGrew Hill 2003

      19 Grenfell, M., "Modern languages and Learning Strategies: In Theory and Exercises" Cambridge University Press 1999

      20 Mokhtari, K., "Measuring ESL students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies" 25 : 2-10, 2002

      21 Cohen, A. D., "Learner-directed Assessment in ESL" Lawrence Erlbaum 127-150, 2000

      22 Oxford, R., "Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know" Heinle & Heinle 1990

      23 Dreyer, C., "Language Learning Strategies around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives" University of Hawaii Press 61-74, 1996

      24 Anderson, N. J., "Individual Differences in Strategy Use in Second Language Reading and Testing" 75 (75): 460-472, 1991

      25 Rubin, J., "How to Be a More Successful Learner?" Heinle & Heinle 1982

      26 Reiss, M. A., "Helping the Unsuccessful Language Learner" 65 (65): 121-128, 1981

      27 Jeong-WonLee, "An Exploratory Study on Reading Comprehension Test-Taking Processes and Strategies in the EFL Context" 한국영어교육학회 57 (57): 177-195, 2002

      28 Anderson, N. J., "An Exploratory Study into the Construct Validity of a Reading Comprehension Test: Triangulation of Data Sources" 8 (8): 41-66, 1991

      29 Purpura, J. E., "An Analysis of the Relationship Test-takers Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use and Second Language Test Performance" 47 (47): 289-325, 1997

      30 Lee, Jeong-Won, "A Study on English Reading Test-taking Strategies" 한국영어교육학회 59 (59): 145-166, 2004

      31 Green, J., "A Closer Look at Learner Strategies, L2 Proficiency, and Gender" 29 : 261-297, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Joong Won Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Joongwon Linguistic Society of Korea KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-05-14 학회명변경 한글명 : 중원언어학회 -> 한국중원언어학회
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.51 0.864 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼