미래 한반도에서의 안정화작전 수행방안 - 6.25전쟁 시 사례분석을 중심으로 - = How to execute Stability Operation on Korean Peninsula in future

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

US-led coalition forces successfully destroyed Iraqi forces during the Iraqi War in March, 2003. However, the military victory of US-led coalition forces did not result in a political victory. US has made an effort to improve the stabilization measures both national and military level since 2004. Recently ROK forces have also started to recognize the significance of stability operation and studied. Relating to the locations, targets, and aims of war, ROK forces` measures are different from those of the US forces`. For instance, whereas the American purpose of stability operation is aimed at building a new nation outside the mainland, ROK forces` operation is intended for a unified Korea. In this regard, It is necessary to establish a revised concept of stability operation especially for the Korean Peninsula.
This study analyzed some of the historical cases that resulted in the successful stabilization, including the unification process of German, James Dobbins` successful condition of nation-building, the Iraq war, and Mao Zedong`s role during the Chinese Civil War. This study identified that the common key elements of driving a stabilization process effectively are ① a complete preparation, ② a legal task enforcement, ③ a comprehensive efforts, and ④ a conflict management.
The results of this study are suggested as follows.
First, effectiveness of a stabilization enforcement unit should be guaranteed. To do this, the government needs to clarify each role of a combat unit, a stability division, and a civil unit in each stage of operation. A professional joint stability division consisting of civil, governmental, and military units should be also organized. The stability division must be immediately deployed in recovered areas so that it can carry out successfully stability operations as early as possible.
Second, public order and administrative system should be settled in early stage. For this, a temporary committee in relation to public order and local administration in each administrative district should be operated. Local representatives, a stability division, government agencies, and police officers are to be included in the committee.
Thrid, military integration and WMD control process should be supported. For this, it is necessary to disarm the mobilized enemy and to treat hostile persons and military servants. POW and a deserted soldiers from nK forces should be well managed. WMD facilities should be safely controlled to avoid security risk.
Fourth, the government should provide a humanitarian support and secure chances for autonomous economic activities. Finally, the government should minimize conflicts of the people in order to recover homogeneity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 합동참모본부, "합동교범 1『합동기본교리』"

2 하정열, "한반도 통일후 군사통합방안: 독일 군사통합과정과 교훈" 팔복원 1996

3 강만길, "한반도 통일논의의 쟁점과 과제" 한신대학교 출판부 2001

4 서용선, "한국전쟁연구(점령정책, 노무운용, 동원)" 국방군사연구소 1995

5 김용희, "한국전쟁시 북한군의 점령지역 군사정책에 관한 연구" 경기대학교 정치전문대학원 2004

6 중앙일보사, "한국전쟁 실록 민족의 증언" 을유문화사 1973

7 조영갑, "통일한국 민군작전에 관한 연구" 한국통일진흥원 (14) : 2011

8 안광호, "통일이후를 대비한 남북한문화교류를 통한 동질성 회복에 관한 연구" 한국통일진흥원 (15) : 2012

9 成允煥, "전후 북한수복정책에 관한 연구" 延世大學校 行政大學院 1994

10 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "이라크 재건의 뼈아픈 교훈" 국방부 2013

11 전현준, "북한체제의 내구력 평가" 통일연구원 2006

12 이석, "북한경제의 대외의존성과 한국경제의 영향력" 통일연구원 2006

13 김연윤, "북한 경제개혁의 실태와 전망에 관한 연구" 통일연구원 2006

14 합동참모본부, "민군작전 사례집" 합참 2009

15 지상전연구소, "미 합동교범 3-24 번역본『대반란 작전(Counterinsurgency Operations)』"

16 육군대학, "미 야교 3-07 번역본『안정화작전(Stability Operations)』"

17 육군대학, "미 야교 3-0 번역본『작전(Operations)』"

18 김동명, "독일 통일, 그리고 한반도의 선택" 한울아카데미 2010

19 육군본부, "기록으로 본 6․25전쟁과 민군작전" 충남 계룡 2012

20 육군군사연구소, "6․25전쟁의 실패사례와 교훈" 충남 계룡 2013

21 육군본부, "6․25전쟁 다하지 못한 이야기들" 충남 계룡 2011

22 김응수, "21세기 북한의 이해" 북코리아 2011