RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개선된 배깅 앙상블을 활용한 기업부도예측

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100392722

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Predicting corporate failure has been an important topic in accounting and finance. The costs associated with bankruptcy are high, so the accuracy of bankruptcy prediction is greatly important for financial institutions. Lots of researchers have dealt...

      Predicting corporate failure has been an important topic in accounting and finance. The costs associated with bankruptcy are high, so the accuracy of bankruptcy prediction is greatly important for financial institutions. Lots of researchers have dealt with the topic associated with bankruptcy prediction in the past three decades. The current research attempts to use ensemble models for improving the performance of bankruptcy prediction. Ensemble classification is to combine individually trained classifiers in order to gain more accurate prediction than individual models. Ensemble techniques are shown to be very useful for improving the generalization ability of the classifier.
      Bagging is the most commonly used methods for constructing ensemble classifiers. In bagging, the different training data subsets are randomly drawn with replacement from the original training dataset. Base classifiers are trained on the different bootstrap samples. Instance selection is to select critical instances while deleting and removing irrelevant and harmful instances from the original set. Instance selection and bagging are quite well known in data mining. However, few studies have dealt with the integration of instance selection and bagging. This study proposes an improved bagging ensemble based on instance selection using genetic algorithms (GA) for improving the performance of SVM. GA is an efficient optimization procedure based on the theory of natural selection and evolution. GA uses the idea of survival of the fittest by progressively accepting better solutions to the problems. GA searches by maintaining a population of solutions from which better solutions are created rather than making incremental changes to a single solution to the problem. The initial solution population is generated randomly and evolves into the next generation by genetic operators such as selection, crossover and mutation. The solutions coded by strings are evaluated by the fitness function.
      The proposed model consists of two phases: GA based Instance Selection and Instance based Bagging. In the first phase, GA is used to select optimal instance subset that is used as input data of bagging model. In this study, the chromosome is encoded as a form of binary string for the instance subset. In this phase, the population size was set to 100 while maximum number of generations was set to 150. We set the crossover rate and mutation rate to 0.7 and 0.1 respectively. We used the prediction accuracy of model as the fitness function of GA. SVM model is trained on training data set using the selected instance subset. The prediction accuracy of SVM model over test data set is used as fitness value in order to avoid overfitting. In the second phase, we used the optimal instance subset selected in the first phase as input data of bagging model. We used SVM model as base classifier for bagging ensemble. The majority voting scheme was used as a combining method in this study.
      This study applies the proposed model to the bankruptcy prediction problem using a real data set from Korean companies. The research data used in this study contains 1832 externally non-audited firms which filed for bankruptcy (916 cases) and non-bankruptcy (916 cases). Financial ratios categorized as stability, profitability, growth, activity and cash flow were investigated through literature review and basic statistical methods and we selected 8 financial ratios as the final input variables. We separated the whole data into three subsets as training, test and validation data set. In this study, we compared the proposed model with several comparative models including the simple individual SVM model, the simple bagging model and the instance selection based SVM model. The McNemar tests were used to examine whether the proposed model significantly outperforms the other models. The experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms the other models.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 안현철, "효과적인 고객관계관리를 위한 사례기반추론 동시 최적화 모형" 한국지능정보시스템학회 11 (11): 175-195, 2005

      2 김명종, "회사채 신용등급 예측을 위한 SVM 앙상블학습" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 29-45, 2012

      3 김경재, "재무예측을 위한 Support Vector Machine의 최적화" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 241-254, 2011

      4 홍승현, "유전자 알고리즘을 활용한 인공신경망 모형 최적입력변수의 선정: 부도예측 모형을 중심으로" 한국지능정보시스템학회 9 (9): 227-249, 2003

      5 김명종, "유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 분류자 앙상블의 최적 선택" 한국지능정보시스템학회 16 (16): 99-112, 2010

      6 옥중경, "유전자 알고리즘 기반의 기업부실예측 통합모형" 한국지능정보시스템학회 15 (15): 99-121, 2009

      7 김다윗, "신경망 분리모형과 사례기반추론을 이용한기업 신용 평가" 한국데이타베이스학회 14 (14): 151-168, 2007

      8 김명종, "기업부실화 예측에 대한 앙상블 학습의 성과 비교" 엘지씨엔에스 8 (8): 41-49, 2009

      9 김경재, "기업부도예측을 위한 인공신경망 모형에서의 사례선택기법에 의한 데이터 마이닝" 한국지능정보시스템학회 10 (10): 109-123, 2004

      10 Shaw, M. J., "Using and expert system with inductive learning to evaluate business loans" 17 (17): 45-56, 1988

      1 안현철, "효과적인 고객관계관리를 위한 사례기반추론 동시 최적화 모형" 한국지능정보시스템학회 11 (11): 175-195, 2005

      2 김명종, "회사채 신용등급 예측을 위한 SVM 앙상블학습" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 29-45, 2012

      3 김경재, "재무예측을 위한 Support Vector Machine의 최적화" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 241-254, 2011

      4 홍승현, "유전자 알고리즘을 활용한 인공신경망 모형 최적입력변수의 선정: 부도예측 모형을 중심으로" 한국지능정보시스템학회 9 (9): 227-249, 2003

      5 김명종, "유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 분류자 앙상블의 최적 선택" 한국지능정보시스템학회 16 (16): 99-112, 2010

      6 옥중경, "유전자 알고리즘 기반의 기업부실예측 통합모형" 한국지능정보시스템학회 15 (15): 99-121, 2009

      7 김다윗, "신경망 분리모형과 사례기반추론을 이용한기업 신용 평가" 한국데이타베이스학회 14 (14): 151-168, 2007

      8 김명종, "기업부실화 예측에 대한 앙상블 학습의 성과 비교" 엘지씨엔에스 8 (8): 41-49, 2009

      9 김경재, "기업부도예측을 위한 인공신경망 모형에서의 사례선택기법에 의한 데이터 마이닝" 한국지능정보시스템학회 10 (10): 109-123, 2004

      10 Shaw, M. J., "Using and expert system with inductive learning to evaluate business loans" 17 (17): 45-56, 1988

      11 Vapnik, V. N., "The nature of statistical learning theory" Springer 1995

      12 Hart, P. E., "The condensed nearest neighbor rule" 14 : 515-516, 1968

      13 Meyer, P. A., "Prediction of bank failures" 25 (25): 853-868, 1970

      14 García, V., "On the use of data filtering techniques for credit risk prediction with instance-based models" 39 (39): 13267-13276, 2012

      15 Bian, S., "On diversity and accuracy of homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles" 4 (4): 103-128, 2007

      16 김승혁, "Modified Bagging Predictors를 이용한 SOHO 부도 예측" 한국지능정보시스템학회 13 (13): 15-26, 2007

      17 Buta, P., "Mining for financial knowledge with CBR" 9 (9): 34-41, 1994

      18 Kuncheva, L. I., "Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy" 51 (51): 181-207, 2003

      19 Tam, K. Y., "Managerial applications of neural networks: the case of bank failure predictions" 38 (38): 926-947, 1992

      20 Dietterich, T. G., "Machine-learning research: Four current directions" 18 (18): 97-136, 1997

      21 Messier, W. F. Jr., "Inducing rules for expert system development: an example using default and bankruptcy data" 34 (34): 1403-1415, 1998

      22 Qiu-yue Tai, "GA-based Normalization Approach in Back-propagation Neural Network for Bankruptcy Prediction Modeling" 한국지능정보시스템학회 16 (16): 1-14, 2010

      23 Altman, E. I., "Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy" 23 (23): 589-609, 1968

      24 Beaver, W. H., "Financial ratios as predictors of failure" 4 : 71-111, 1966

      25 Ohlson, J. A., "Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy" 18 (18): 109-131, 1980

      26 Derrac, J., "Enhancing evolutionary instance selection algorithms by means of fuzzy rough set based feature selection" 186 (186): 73-92, 2012

      27 Min, S.-H., "Developing an Ensemble Classifier for Bankruptcy Prediction" 17 (17): 139-148, 2012

      28 신택수, "Corporate Credit Rating based on Bankruptcy Probability Using AdaBoost Algorithm-based Support Vector Machine" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 25-41, 2011

      29 Kuncheva, L. I., "Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms" John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004

      30 Breiman, L., "Bagging predictors" 24 (24): 123-140, 1996

      31 Fawcett, T., "An Introduction to ROC Analysis" 27 (27): 861-874, 2006

      32 Dimitras, A. I., "A survey of business failure with an emphasis on prediction methods and industrial applications" 90 (90): 487-513, 1996

      33 Bryant, S. M., "A case-based reasoning approach to bankruptcy prediction modeling" 6 (6): 195-214, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
      2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼