『源氏物語』속「ななり」와 「なめり」의 통사적 특징

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper is a study of syntax of "nanari" and "nameri" in Genzi′s story. These phrases "nanari" and "nameri" consist of the declarative auxiliary verb "nari" and the suppositional auxiliary verb "nari" and "meri", respectively. The paper clarifies the syntactic features of "nanari" and "nameri" by comparing them with the declarative modality in Nita (2009).
"Nanari" is in general used as a predicate. There is no evidence that it was used in the past form. Further, it was not used as a predicate in a noun-modifying clause and its use as a predicate within a subordinate clause was also restricted. It can be used with "omohu". It can also be used with the appropriateness modality and explanation modality. When used with the explanation modality, "nanari" is located behind the explanation modality. In summary "nanari" is similar to Nita′s "Guess".
"Nameri" is also in general used as a predicate. However, there is evidence that "nanari" was used as the past form. It was also used in modifying-noun clauses although there were some limits. It can be used as a predicate in a variety of subordinate clauses. Further, it can be used with "omohu". It can be used with the appropriateness modality and the explanation modality. When used with the explanation modality, "nanari" is located behind the explanation modality. In summary "nanari" is similar to Nita′s "Judgment from probability".
There is are distinct differences between "nanari" and "Guess", as well as between "nameri" and "Judgment from probability", respectively. "Guess" and “Judgment from probability" may be used with a conditional phrase, whereas "nanari" and "nameri" may be not. It is possible to use "Judgment from probability" in combination with "Guess", but it is impossible in the case of "nanari" and "nameri", i.e they cannot be combined with each other. "Nanari" is possible to use with aural information. In criticisms or comments of the story narrator, only "nameri" is used and "nanari" is not.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 연구목적
• 2. 선행연구
• 3.「ななり」와 「なめり」의 통사구조
• 4. 『源氏物語』의 「ななり」와 「なめり」의 의미적 특징
• 5. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 요지

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 田島光平, "連体形承接の『なり』についてー竹取物語を中心にしてー" 12-21, 1964

2 杉村泰, "続·カモシレナイとニチガイナイの異質性ーコーパス調査の結果からー" 国際言語文化研究科 261-276, 2002

3 高山善行, "日本語文法大辞典" 明治書院 574-, 2001

4 寺村秀夫, "日本語シンタクスと意味Ⅱ" くろしお出版 235-236, 1984

5 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティとその周辺" ひつじ書房 97-188, 2009

6 吉田金彦, "日本文法大辞典" 明治書院 613-, 1961

7 北原保雄, "国語と国文学" 55-71, 1966

8 中村幸弘, "国文法講座2 古典解釈と文法ー活用語" 明治書院 379-404, 1987

9 内尾久美, "古典語現代語助詞助動詞詳説" 学燈社 653-654, 1986

10 柴田敏, "ナナリとナメリの<判断>について" 三省堂 33-45, 1994

11 竹岡正夫, "あゆひ抄新注" 風間書房 301-, 1990

12 小松光三, "『ななり』『なめり』『なりけり』の意味機能" 20 : 15-27, 1982

13 野田春美, "「の(だ)」の機能" くろしろ出版 31-59, 1997