A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent (IC) for explaining the epidural analgesia in labor.
Methods: The present study is based on a survey through a telephone questionnaire that covered all the hospitals in Korea where the anesthesiologists’ belonged to and are registered with Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to administration of epidural analgesia to a parturient, information on different steps of obtaining an IC, whether patient status was evaluated , when the consent was obtained, and the reasons behind, if the consent had not being given.
Results: A total of 1,434 respondents took part in the survey, with a response rate of 97% (1,434/1,467). One hundred seventy-four hospitals had conducted epidural analgesia on the parturient. The overall rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia during labor was 85%, of which only 13% was conducted by anesthesiologists. The rate of evaluating preoperative patient status was 74%, of which 45% was conducted by anesthesiologists. Almost all of the consent was obtained prior to the procedure.
Conclusions: The rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia in labor is relatively high (85%) in Korea. However, it is necessary to discuss the content of the consent and the procedure followed for obtaining IC during the rapid progress of labor.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최승표, "자연분만 후 발생한 양측성 넙다리신경병증(Femoral neuropathy)" 대한마취과학회 57 (57): 228-232, 2009

2 구길회, "마취동의서에 대한 실태 연구" 대한마취과학회 52 (52): 179-186, 2007

3 안원식, "국내 마취동의서 실태" 대한마취과학회 48 (48): 117-123, 2005

4 Supreme Court of South Korea, "The legality of releasing clinicians from the obligation of explanation in cases that have a low possibility of the risks for sequelae/side effects"

5 Supreme Court of South Korea, "The content of clinicians’obligation of explanation and compensation cases due to its violation"

6 Supreme Court of South Korea, "The content of clinicians’ obligation of explanation and the legality of explanation by clinicians who are in charge of the corresponding surgery but not in charge of treatment"

7 Paech M, "Just put it in! Consent for epidural analgesia in labour" 34 : 147-149, 2006

8 Rosen M, "Just put it in! Consent for epidural analgesia in labour" 34 : 519-520, 2006

9 Jackson A, "Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know" 47 : 1068-1073, 2000

10 Middle JV, "Informed consent for epidural analgesia in labour: a survey of UK practice" 64 : 161-164, 2009

11 Smedstad KG, "Informed consent for epidural analgesia in labour" 47 : 1055-1059, 2000

12 Pattee C, "Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues" 44 : 918-923, 1997

13 White SM, "Consent for anaesthesia" 58 : 760-774, 2003

14 Yun SY, "A survey on the concepts of informed consent among emergency physician" Yonsei University 2004