오늘날 글로벌 무한경쟁에서 한국의 중소기업들은 기술과 자금 그리고 대내외적인 환경 등을 포함하여 대기업에 비해 상대적으로 경영상의 어려움에 노출되어 있다. 이에 정부는 대기업과 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102778946
2016
Korean
동반성장 ; 공동기술개발 ; 정보공유 ; 재무적 지원 ; 협력 ; 신뢰 ; Shared Growth ; Joint Technical Development ; Information Sharing ; Fund Support ; Cooperation ; Trust
325
학술저널
39-65(27쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
오늘날 글로벌 무한경쟁에서 한국의 중소기업들은 기술과 자금 그리고 대내외적인 환경 등을 포함하여 대기업에 비해 상대적으로 경영상의 어려움에 노출되어 있다. 이에 정부는 대기업과 ...
오늘날 글로벌 무한경쟁에서 한국의 중소기업들은 기술과 자금 그리고 대내외적인 환경 등을 포함하여 대기업에 비해 상대적으로 경영상의 어려움에 노출되어 있다. 이에 정부는 대기업과 중소기업 간의 협력과 공생을 위한 동반성장의 환경조성과 합리적인 정책을 제공하기 위해 전력하고 있다. 이러한 배경 하에 본 논문의 연구목적은 중소 제조기업을 대상으로 협력과 신뢰와 같은 관계특성 요인이 중소기업이 지각하는 동반성장의 성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 살펴보고자 한다. 가설 검증을 위해 대기업과 동반성장 협력을 진행하고 있는 중소제조업체를 대상으로 설문조사를 진행하였다. 수집된 설문자료를 기초로 PLS(Partial Least Square Path Analysis)경로모형을 사용하여 가설검증을 하였다. 검증결과 대기업의 동반성장을 위한 노력에서 정보공유와 재무적 지원은 협력에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었으며, 특히 재무적 지원 노력은 신뢰에도 긍정적인 영향을 주고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 협력과 신뢰가 동반성장 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 대기업과 중소기업 간의 협력과 신뢰를 변수로 한 중소제조기업들의 동반성장 인식 정도에 대한 연구가 부족하다는 점에서 그 의의가 있다고 할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구가 중소제조기업의 입장에서 동반성장실현을 위한 성장전략과 이를 바탕으로 한 실천적 대안연구와 관련하여 기초자료로 활용 되었으면 한다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In the era of the global infinite competition, Korean small and middle sized firms face a lack of various aspects including technology, finance, and domestic and foreign conditions. Therefore, the government does all the best to provide the environmen...
In the era of the global infinite competition, Korean small and middle sized firms face a lack of various aspects including technology, finance, and domestic and foreign conditions. Therefore, the government does all the best to provide the environment of shared growth and reasonable policy to cooperate and co-exist between large companies and small and middle sized enterprises. Therefore, on the assumption that the cooperation and trust of small and middle sized manufacturers positively influence the performance of shared growth that they perceives, the purpose of this study is to investigate the factor that give the biggest influence, and to examine whether a business period influences the shared growth that small and middle sized firms perceive. The variables used for the hypotheses in this study are operationally defined on the basis of various literatures. And based on previous studies, the mostly used measurement scale was applied. Five points Likert scale was applied to all items of the questionnaire of this study. A questionnaire survey was conducted with small and middle sized manufactures in shared growth cooperation with large companies. With the collected questionnaire data, PLS(Partial Least Square Path Analysis), one of structural equation models, was used to examine hypotheses. According to the analysis on the examination of study hypotheses, information sharing and financial support, as the efforts of large companies for shared growth, positively influenced cooperation. In particular, financial support also positively influenced trust. In addition, cooperation and trust positively affected the performance of shared growth. There was almost no theoretical research on the effects of cooperation and trust between large companies and small and middle sized firms on their performance of shared growth. Therefore, this study is meaningful in such a point. Therefore, it is expected that the study results will be used as a fundamental material to come up with a growth strategy to realize shared growth from the standpoint of small and middle sized manufacturers and to conduct practical alternative research.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Hosmer, L. T., "Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics" 20 (20): 379-403, 1995
2 Woolthuis, R., "Trust, Contract and Relationship Development" 26 (26): 813-840, 2005
3 Mentzer, J. T., "The Nature of Interfirm Partnering in Supply Chain Management" 76 (76): 549-568, 2000
4 Williamson, O. E., "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting" Free Press 1985
5 Morgan, R.M., "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing" 58 (58): 20-38, 1994
6 Nunnally, J. C., "The Assessment of Reliability" 3 (3): 248-292, 1994
7 Kurokawa, S., "Technological Alliance Strategies in Japanese Manufacturing Firms" 1994
8 Ring, P. S., "Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations" 13 (13): 483-498, 1992
9 Powell, Walter W., "Research in Organizational Behavior, 12" JAI Press 295-336, 1990
10 Sako, M., "Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relationships in Britain and Japan" Cambridge University Press 1992
1 Hosmer, L. T., "Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics" 20 (20): 379-403, 1995
2 Woolthuis, R., "Trust, Contract and Relationship Development" 26 (26): 813-840, 2005
3 Mentzer, J. T., "The Nature of Interfirm Partnering in Supply Chain Management" 76 (76): 549-568, 2000
4 Williamson, O. E., "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting" Free Press 1985
5 Morgan, R.M., "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing" 58 (58): 20-38, 1994
6 Nunnally, J. C., "The Assessment of Reliability" 3 (3): 248-292, 1994
7 Kurokawa, S., "Technological Alliance Strategies in Japanese Manufacturing Firms" 1994
8 Ring, P. S., "Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations" 13 (13): 483-498, 1992
9 Powell, Walter W., "Research in Organizational Behavior, 12" JAI Press 295-336, 1990
10 Sako, M., "Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relationships in Britain and Japan" Cambridge University Press 1992
11 Tenenhaus, M., "PLS Path Modeling" 48 (48): 159-205, 2005
12 Tidd, J., "Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change" John Willey and Sons 2005
13 Håkansson, H., "International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods" Wiley 1982
14 Kwon, I. W., "Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships" 40 (40): 4-14, 2004
15 Tyler, B. B., "Evaluating Technological Collaborative Opportunities: A Cognitive Modeling Perspective" 16 (16): 43-70, 1995
16 Zaheer, A., "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance" 9 (9): 141-159, 1998
17 Tidd, J., "Development of Novel Products through Intraorganizational and Interorganizational Networks: The Case of Home Automation" 12 (12): 307-322, 1995
18 Ring, P. S., "Development Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships" 19 (19): 90-118, 1994
19 Hu, L. T., "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives" 6 (6): 1-55, 1999
20 Park, J., "Corporate Social Responsibilities, Consumer Trust and Corporate Reputation: South Korean Consumers’ Perspectives" 67 (67): 295-302, 2014
21 Skinner, S. J., "Cooperation in Supplier-Dealer Relations" 68 (68): 174-, 1992
22 Häusler, J., "Contingencies of Innovative Networks: A Case Study of Successful Interfirm R&D Collaboration" 23 (23): 47-66, 1994
23 Kaufman, A., "Collaboration and Technology Linkages: A Strategic Supplier Typology" 21 (21): 649-663, 2000
24 Mohr, J., "Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques" 15 (15): 135-152, 1994
25 Kline, S. J., "An Overview of Innovation-The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth" National Academy Press 1986
26 Mayer, R. C., "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust" 20 (20): 709-734, 1995
27 Zineldin, M., "An Examination of the Main Factors Affecting Trust/Commitment in Supplier-Dealer Relationships: An Empirical Study of the Swedish Wood Industry" 12 (12): 245-266, 2000
28 McCann, J. E., "An Approach for Assessing and Managing Inter-Unit Interdependence" 4 (4): 113-119, 1979
29 Park, N. K., "A Resource-Based View of Strategy Alliances and Firm Value in the Electronic Marketplace" 30 (30): 7-27, 2004
삼천리 그룹 윤리경영 사례: 윤리적 리더십이 조직 내 윤리풍토형성에 미치는 영향력 고찰
지하경제 입문서: 『불량 경제학(2007.3.25.)』 후기
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2024 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | |
2016-03-22 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국기업윤리학회 -> 한국윤리경영학회 | |
2014-12-31 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Journal of Business Ethics -> Korean Journal of Business Ethics |