생활재활교사의 생태체계적 특성이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 = The Effect that Life-Rehabilitation Teachers' eco-Systems Character Influence to the Quality of Life

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The study is for life-rehabilitation teachers at handicapped living facilities according to the ecology -systematic character, what factor influence to the quality of life, and more to suggest social welfare practical method in order to improve of life's quality. For this, as ecology-systematic view, How the lower level's factor can influence to life-rehabilitation teachers' the quality of life.
To accomplish the purpose of study, it is researched 119 people who work 4 living facilities for mental-retard at Kyungbuk through the structured questionnaire.
First, Condition that life-rehabilitation teachers are realizing the ecology-systematic character is usually general, macro-system character is very high, middle -system and then micro-system order. General standard about the quality of life is little bit higher than general. It is appeared like the order ; present problems, family-relationship, food ,clothing & housing, friend-relationship, daily life and happiness. It shows higher quality of life than Yang ok kyung (1994) and Lee sun young(2004)'s study results. It implies life-rehabilitation teachers relatively higher than students and mental-retard. Subject of study: life-rehabilitation teachers have clear goal of life, value than students, the mental-retard have unclear future but life-rehabilitation teachers are self-satisfied even though coarse working-conditions.
Second, Their (teachers) interrelation between ecologysystematic character and quality of life has correlation with high feeling.Among the lower factors, daily life and happiness factors are higher feeling correlation than other factors. Like this results, it is similar to Lee sung young (2004)'s study but this study showed more high correlation. It means that life-rehabilitation teachers are more affected by ecology-systematic character and they live their lives under the condition. Above all, to show the highest correlation of daily life and happiness is considered the goodness for life that meet the handicapped as a duty. We can see the close relation between life-rehabilitation teachers' life and life of clients' at handicapped facilities.
Third, life-rehabilitation teachers' ecology-systematic character influence to the quality of life. Explanation about general life-quality is very high to the lower factors, except the present problems, food, clothing & housing, relationship of friend & family, health-condition, daily life and happiness usually appeared high explanation. Also, Even though not paying attention to the middle-system, but to be reported that macro-system and micro-system have power. Especially macro-system affects more than micro-system. At Lee sun young(2004)'s study, it reveals that micro-system is the highest factor to influence but this study, it appears that macro-system is the highest factor. The study results show the most important factor for quality of life-rehabilitation teachers is the support from society that means they are under others' concern and love.
Through this study result, I want to suggest the practical things.
First, as the results of study, the most influential factor to the quality of life to them is appeared macro-systematic social support. Social support except for family means support and approval from others. It should be considered quantitative aspect and qualitative aspect to improve social support. For this, satisfy their wants, provide system-condition to guide interaction with others and they should improve their lives' quality by good social support.
Second, results of study, their micro-system (family function) affects to quality of life. Until now, importance of social welfare intervention about family is considered the need of intervention. Social welfare intervention to family-centered micro-system for them is possible to act advocate's role. Concretely, advocate's role about an object of micro-systematic family have difficulty through the poor work environment, should protect the

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 연구방법
• Ⅳ. 조사결과
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 함의