다중메뉴모델에 기초한 학교 현장에서의 STEAM 교육과정 제안 = The suggestion of field applications based on the Multiple Menu Model for a STEAM Curriculum

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study introduced the Multiple Menu Model to propose a STEAM curriculum applied to educational fields, which ideas came from the limitation in suggesting the integrative way to reconstruct contents of diverse disciplinary areas. In terms of these purposes, the study introduced curriculum elements and characteristics of the Multiple Menu Model and exemplary curriculum units based on the Model. The Multiple Menu Model starts teaching and learning work by identifying the location, definition, and organization of the present knowledge(content or discipline) within the larger context of knowledge and then validating the reason to learn the new information in terms of six menus, such as a knowledge menu, an instructional strategies menu, an instructional sequences menu, an artistic modification menu, and an instructional products menu. The Multiple Menu Model also suggests how the actual practices of a discipline stem from the inherent nature of that discipline and integrates with other disciplines. More importantly, it makes clear how a STEAM curriculum must be shaped by how experts in a given field organize their thinking, do their work, and assess the quality of their outcomes. Therefore teachers could facilitate not role of students as knowledge consumers, but role of students as knowledge creators.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 교육과학기술부, "한국의 다빈치 교육" 교육과학기술부 2011

2 신영준, "초등학교 교사들의 융합인재교육(STEAM)에 대한 인식 연구" 한국초등과학교육학회 30 (30): 514-523, 2011

3 김성원, "융합인재교육(STEAM)을 위한 이론적 모형의 제안" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 388-401, 2012

4 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색" 한국기술교육학회 7 (7): 1-29, 2007

5 Renzulli, J. S., "The multiple menu model: A practical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Mansfield Center" Creative Learning Press 2000

6 Stevens, S., "The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering" National Science Teachers Association Press 2009

7 Witz, K. G., "Science as an ideal : Teachers' orientations to science and science education" 41 (41): 409-431, 2009

8 Sanders, M., "STEM, STEM education, STEM mania" 68 (68): 20-26, 2009

9 Yakman, G., "STEM pedagogical commons for contextual learning" Virginia Tech 2006

10 김진수, "STEAM 교육론" 양서원 2012

11 Petroski, H., "Invention by design: How engineers get from thought to thing" Harvard University Press 1996

12 Mark Sanders, "Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues" 사범대학부속중등교육연구소 59 (59): 729-762, 2011

13 Smith, C. L., "Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory" 14 (14): 1-98, 2006

14 Renzulli, J. S., "Handbook of gifted education" Allyn and Bacon 75-99, 2003

15 Renzulli, J. S., "Expanding the umbrella: An interview with Joseph Renzulli" 26 : 65-67, 2004

16 van Langern, A., "Cross-national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education" 41 (41): 329-350, 2005

17 Rossouw, A., "Concept and contexts in engineering and technology" 21 (21): 409-424, 2011

18 Sanders, M., "A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate" 2006

19 교육과학기술부, "2011년 업무보고서: 창의인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국" 교육과학기술부 2010