RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      순부유세 도입 시 문제점에 관한 연구 = The Study on the Introduction of the Net Wealth Tax in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100139686

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The net wealth tax has been levied in OECD countries in Europe for a long time. As of 2012, six countries including France, Iceland, Spain, Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg have the net wealth tax. In the case of these OECD countries in Europe, the net wealth tax is levied annually on the asset value of properties and other assets net of liabilities to individuals or households. Proponents of the net wealth tax in Korea argue that providing welfare with revenues on the net wealth tax will reduce income inequality and increase tax fairness. However, the OECD countries that introduced the net wealth tax report high costs of tax collection and tax compliance in contrast to the low tax revenues. In some countries, there was greater inequality and lower economic growth during the period when net wealth tax was levied (Hansson 2002; Klevmarken 2004; Jaantti 2004; Hansson 2005; Duran-Cabre and Esteller Moree 2011). Thus, the effect of the net wealth tax in Korea is highly uncertain. The legal issues are as follows. First, without full preparation of a fair and accurate valuation method, taxes on unrealized gains can be determined unconstitutional. Second, net wealth tax on households or married couples can be determined unconstitutional. Third, different tax rates on assets with the same property value can be in violation of the principle of tax equality. Fourth, there are issues of double taxation in addition to property tax, capital gain tax, and comprehensive real estate holding tax. Due to the problems discussed above, introduction of the net wealth tax requires careful judgment. Thus, for the purpose of reducing inequality, we recommend improving problems in the current capital gains tax rather than imposing the net wealth tax on unrealized gains.
      번역하기

      The net wealth tax has been levied in OECD countries in Europe for a long time. As of 2012, six countries including France, Iceland, Spain, Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg have the net wealth tax. In the case of these OECD countries in Europe, the ...

      The net wealth tax has been levied in OECD countries in Europe for a long time. As of 2012, six countries including France, Iceland, Spain, Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg have the net wealth tax. In the case of these OECD countries in Europe, the net wealth tax is levied annually on the asset value of properties and other assets net of liabilities to individuals or households. Proponents of the net wealth tax in Korea argue that providing welfare with revenues on the net wealth tax will reduce income inequality and increase tax fairness. However, the OECD countries that introduced the net wealth tax report high costs of tax collection and tax compliance in contrast to the low tax revenues. In some countries, there was greater inequality and lower economic growth during the period when net wealth tax was levied (Hansson 2002; Klevmarken 2004; Jaantti 2004; Hansson 2005; Duran-Cabre and Esteller Moree 2011). Thus, the effect of the net wealth tax in Korea is highly uncertain. The legal issues are as follows. First, without full preparation of a fair and accurate valuation method, taxes on unrealized gains can be determined unconstitutional. Second, net wealth tax on households or married couples can be determined unconstitutional. Third, different tax rates on assets with the same property value can be in violation of the principle of tax equality. Fourth, there are issues of double taxation in addition to property tax, capital gain tax, and comprehensive real estate holding tax. Due to the problems discussed above, introduction of the net wealth tax requires careful judgment. Thus, for the purpose of reducing inequality, we recommend improving problems in the current capital gains tax rather than imposing the net wealth tax on unrealized gains.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼