기업재편의 활성화와 그 딜레마 - 회사분할, 주식양수도에 관한 회사법 개정안들을 중심으로 - = A Step Towards Business Friendly M&A Rules and Its Dilemma

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Strong M&A activities are of great importance to economic dynamics of a country as well as growth of an enterprise. Korean government has shown keen interest in preparing business friendly M&A rules, as witnessed by a reform bill submitted by the Ministry of Justice in 2014. Flexible M&A rules, however, often risk the interest of minority shareholders because a transfer of wealth might be secretly and implicitly made under the process of complicated M&A deals. This paper is to analyze two bills recently submitted by the Members of the National Assembly. Balancing the initiative by the government in favor of the business community, those bills are focused upon the protection of minority shareholders. The paper is to deal with the uneasy task how to reconcile the conflicting goals of adopting business friendly M&A rules and providing sufficient protections for minority shareholders.
First part of the paper is concerned with corporate division (or demerger). The Korean Commercial Code (“KCC”) has provided detailed provisions on corporate division. The corporate division regime under the KCC adopted in 1998 is frequently used for the purposes of corporate restructuring. In a corporate division, the shares of new entity (Y) separated from the old company (X) are supposed to be distributed to incumbent shareholders of X, which makes the shareholding ratio of Y just the same as that of X. The problem begins where X has treasury shares: dominant Korean business practices allow the distribution of Y shares even to those treasury shares. Accordingly, as far as Y is concerned, the controlling shareholders of X get strengthened grip thanks to the existence of treasury shares in X. For example, if X’s shares were owned by P(42%), Q(28%) and X(30%, treasury shares) and some business department of X was separated into new company Y via corporate division, P’s actual ratio in Y shall be drastically increased to 72% {42% + 30%(held by X which is controlled by P)}. The new bill prohibits the distribution of new shares to treasury shares. While some concern was raised that such reform shall chill corporate division activities, the new bill seems to be in the right direction. The current practice is far from creating values from M&As but serves the benefit of controlling shareholders to the detriment of minority shareholders.
Second part is about the shareholder approval upon controlling share block sales. Unlike statutory merger and comprehensive business transfer, the KCC has not required any shareholders’ control in case of share deals. The new bill, however, adopted a requirement of the shareholders’ special resolution provided that the size of the share deals is quite large (i.e. 50% or more of the net asset of the transacting party). The paper thoroughly reviewed the rationales of the new bill from the theoretical basis as well as comparative legal analysis. Under the author’s opinion, the new bill seems persuasive as far as it requires the approval of the shareholders’ meeting in an acquiring company. There have been many cases in Korea that controlling shareholders and directors, due to their ambition to enlarge their conglomerate, failed to correctly estimate the value of target company’s shares, ending up so-called winner’s curse. The scope and specific requirements of the shareholders’ approval under the new bill, however, need to be streamlined.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 황남석, "회사분할과 자기주식" 한국세법학회 21 (21): 117-138, 2015

2 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2013

3 홍복기, "회사법강의" 법문사 2015

4 최준선, "회사법[제10판]" 삼영사 2015

5 임재연, "회사법 I, II" 박영사 2013

6 김정호, "회사법" 법문사 2015

7 김건식, "회사법" 박영사 2015

8 천경훈, "한국 M&A의 특성과 그 법적 시사점에 관한 試論" 법무부 (56) : 133-168, 2011

9 김건식, "지주회사와 법" 소화 2005

10 한국상사법학회, "주식회사법 대계 III" 법문사 2013

11 Melvin A. Eisenberg, "주식회사 법리의 새로운 경향" 경문사 1983

12 정동윤, "주석 상법: 회사 IV" 한국사법행정학회 2014

13 윤영신, "자기주식의 합병대가 산입 문제와 조직재편거래상 주주총회 승인요건의 재정비 방안 － 특히 소규모합병과 합병대가유연화와 관련하여－" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 9-41, 2007

14 노혁준, "자기주식과 기업의 합병, 분할" 한국증권법학회 9 (9): 117-153, 2008

15 유진수, "인적분할을 통한 지주회사 전환에 대한 연구" 한국산업조직학회 22 (22): 73-95, 2014

16 황남석, "상법상 배당가능이익에 의한 자기주식 취득의 쟁점" 한국상사법학회 31 (31): 59-109, 2012

17 경제개혁연대, "상법상 ‘상장회사의 대규모 자산양수도시 주주총회 특별결의 의무화‘ 하는 입법안 발표"

18 송옥렬, "상법강의 제5판" 서울 2015

19 김홍기, "상법강의" 박영사 2015

20 문광섭, "상법 일부개정법률안(유승희 의원 대표발의) 검토보고" 2013

21 심태규, "상법 일부개정법률안(김기준 의원 대표발의) 검토보고" 2015

22 송옥렬, "민사소송법의 과제(하촌 정동윤 선생 고희기념논문집)" 법문사 2009

23 노혁준, "기업재편제도의 재편: 합병, 주식교환 및 삼각합병제도를 중심으로" 한국경제법학회 13 (13): 49-80, 2014

24 권기범, "기업구조조정법" 삼영사 2011

25 김화진, "경영권 이전과 주식가액 프리미엄" 대한변호사협회 (427) : 81-94, 2012

26 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" 有斐閣 2014

27 落合誠一, "會社法コメンタール 12 (齊藤真紀 執筆部分)" 商社法務 2013

28 坂本三郞, "平成26年改正會社法の解說(VI)"

29 法務省民事局参事官室, "会社法制の見直しに関する中間試案の補足説明"

30 Gilson, Ronald J., "The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions" 1995

31 Kraakman, Reinier, "The Anatomy of Corporate Law" Oxford University Press 2009

32 Allen, William T., "Reinier Kraakman and Guhan Subramanian, Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization" Aspen 2009

33 ABA Committee on Corporate Laws of the Section of Business Law, "Model Business Corporation Act: Official Text with Official Comments and Statutory Cross References"

34 Clark, Robert C., "Corporation Law" Little, Brown & Company 1986

35 Klein, William A., "Business Association" 2003