의료의 질 향상을 위한 환자중심 건강결과 측정의 국제 동향과 국내 시사점 - OECD PaRIS를 중심으로 = International Trends on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Improving Care Quality and Its Implication for South Korea: Focus on OECD PaRIS

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to derive implication on the adoption of PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcome Measures) to improve quality of care in South Korea. With this purpose, the paper examines the status of PROMs in South Korea and other countries including OECD's PaRIS (Patient Reported Indicators Survey) initiative, and reviews policy cases that have adopted PROMs to improve performance of healthcare system. Methods: We conducted literature review on OECD reports on PaRIS, peer-reviewed journals, and information from the websites of relevant institutions such as ICHOM, NQF and OECD. Results: To identify healthcare services of best values and support patient-centered health system, OECD has initiated PaRIS which develops, collects and analyzes patient-reported indicators for cross-countries comparison. PaRIS is implemented on two work streams: 1) collect, validate and standardize PROMs in the areas where patient-reported indicators already exist such as breast cancers, hip and knee replacement, and mental conditions, 2) develop a new international survey on multiple chronic conditions. Countries like England, U.S., Sweden and Netherlands use PROMs for measuring performance of hospitals and performance evaluation at the national level, and provide the financial incentives for reporting PROMs. Conclusions: The use of PROMs can support the current policy agenda that is the patient-centered healthcare system which has been emphasized to reinforce the primary and the community-based care. For the use of PROMs, it is recommended to actively participate in PaRIS initiative by OECD, select appropriate instruments for PROMs, and continue on standardization of them. This will assure patients' involvement in improving health system performance, systemize information generated in the process of adopting PROMs, and develop a system to evaluate performance.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고태성, "퇴행성 슬관절염 환자에 대한 한글판 WOMAC Index의 신뢰도와 타당성에 관한 연구" 한방재활의학과학회 19 (19): 251-260, 2009

2 이준영, "총괄기능평가척도(Global Assessment of Functioning Scale)와 사회적, 직업적 기능평가척도(Social and Occupational Functioning Scale)" 대한정신약물학회 17 (17): 122-127, 2006

3 이란, "유방암 환자의 자가관리에 대한 자기효능감 측정도구 개발" 한국간호과학회 42 (42): 385-395, 2012

4 하은혜, "유방암 환자의 삶의 질 예측요인" 한국유방암학회 13 (13): 219-226, 2010

5 이남헌, "암의 종류 및 증상에 따른 삶의 질 평가 척도에 관한 연구 현황 분석" 대한한방내과학회 27 (27): 555-560, 2006

6 정찬영, "슬관절의 통증과 기능장애의 평가도구에 관한 연구" 대한침구의학회 27 (27): 123-142, 2010

7 Devlin, NJ, "Valuing health-related quality of life : An EQ5D-5L value set for England" 27 (27): 7-22, 2018

8 Orrell M, "Validity and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in psychiatric patients in the community" 174 (174): 409-412, 1999

9 Brooks R, "The reliability and validity of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales : validation in relation to patient derived measures" 34 (34): 504-511, 2000

10 Ware JE Jr, "The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection" 30 (30): 473-483, 1992

11 Aaronson NK, "The European Orga-nization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 : a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology" 85 (85): 365-376, 1993

12 Koh SB, "Reliability and validity on measurement instrument for health status assessment in occupational workers" 30 (30): 251-266, 1997

13 Yi JS, "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of global assessment of functioning scale" 6 (6): 118-124, 2003

14 Brady MJ, "Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument" 15 (15): 974-986, 1997

15 OECD, "Recommendation to OECD Ministers of Health from the High Level Reflection Group on the future of Health Statistics-Strengthening the international comparison of health system performance through patient-reported indicators" OECD 2017

16 McCann L, "Patients' perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phonebased advanced symptom management system(ASyMS)to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity" 18 (18): 156-164, 2009

17 NQF, "Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Performance Measurement. 2013"

18 OECD, "PaRIS (Patient Reported Indicator Surey): Measuring" OECD 2018

19 McDowell I, "Measuring health–a guide to rating scales and questionnaires" Oxford University Press 2006

20 Ock MS, "Measuring health related quality of life using EQ-5D in South Korea" 1 : 103-111, 2013

21 Coulter A, "Measuring What matters to patients" 368 : j816-, 2017

22 McGrail K, "Let's all go to the PROM : the case for routine patient-reported outcome measurement in Canadian healthcare" 11 (11): 8-18, 2011

23 Collins NJ, "Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS) : systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties" 24 (24): 1317-1329, 2016

24 Health Measures, "Intro to PROMIS"

25 Janet S, "Health outcomes: an overview from an Australian perspective" Australian Health Services research institute, University of Wollongong 2016

26 Wing JK, "Health of the nation outcome scales(HoNOS) : research and development" 172 (172): 11-18, 1998

27 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, "Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims" 74 (74): 65132-65133, 2009

28 Webster G, "Generic PROMs in Canada" 2017

29 Institute of Medicine, "Crossing the quality chasm - a new health system for the 21st century" National Academy Press 2001

30 Bryan S, "Choosing your partner for the PROM : a review of evidence on patient-reported outcome measures for use in primary and community care" 10 (10): 38-51, 2014

31 Ware JE, "Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations" 71 (71): 620-625, 1981

32 Pirkis JE, "A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales(HoNOS)family of measures" 3 : 76-, 2005