Jing-quan Lun 經權論 which may be called the Confucian theory of ethics deals with the problem ‘How can our life be described from a moral point of view?’ Neo-Confucianists made a revolution in answering the question. They tried to explain mora...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30057664
2003
-
300
KCI등재
학술저널
63-77(15쪽)
8
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Jing-quan Lun 經權論 which may be called the Confucian theory of ethics deals with the problem ‘How can our life be described from a moral point of view?’ Neo-Confucianists made a revolution in answering the question. They tried to explain mora...
Jing-quan Lun 經權論 which may be called the Confucian theory of ethics deals with the problem ‘How can our life be described from a moral point of view?’ Neo-Confucianists made a revolution in answering the question. They tried to explain morality in the light of the twofold structure of world or mind. In their view, morality is nothing but the unmanifested mind xing 性, zhong 中, or jing 經, and every human behavior is an outward expression of the unmanifested mind. Seen in this light, human life is the manifestation of jing, and a moral tone of one`s behavior wholly depends on the level of one`s cultivation of mind. Jing-quan Lun implies that all problems of moral education derive from the relationship between the unmanifested mind and the manifested moral behavior, and that the aim of moral education lies in the cultivation of the unmanifested mind. These implications suggest serious theoretical questions: How is the cultivation of the unmanifested mind possible?; Is it true that to initiate manifested moral behavior is the only way to reach the unmanifested mind? In the process of treating these questions, we ascertain a real figure of the Confucian moral education, and also we find a key to solve the problems of moral education in modern school.
초등교육의 맥락에서 본 초급지식의 성격: 교육의 가치와 교과의 가치에 대한 분석
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.82 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.82 | 1.8 | 2.264 | 0.23 |