Seoae Ryu Seong-ryong (柳成龍, 1542-1607), a representative student of Toegye Yi Hwang (李滉, 1502-1571), was an accomplished statecraft thinker despite the lack of scholarship on this issue. As is well-known, he served as prime minister during t...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Seoae Ryu Seong-ryong (柳成龍, 1542-1607), a representative student of Toegye Yi Hwang (李滉, 1502-1571), was an accomplished statecraft thinker despite the lack of scholarship on this issue. As is well-known, he served as prime minister during t...
Seoae Ryu Seong-ryong (柳成龍, 1542-1607), a representative student of Toegye Yi Hwang (李滉, 1502-1571), was an accomplished statecraft thinker despite the lack of scholarship on this issue. As is well-known, he served as prime minister during the Imjin War (1592-1598).
Even in his late years, Seoae continued to emphasize the importance of the mind, in which he differed from Toegye’s other disciples who doggedly focused on the Learning of Principle (lixue 理學). It was indeed the most important aspect of his learning; however, he was also guarded against falling into the learning of Wang Yangming (王陽明, 1472-1529). His interests in Yangming Learning and Buddhism grew in response to the Imjin War, which prompted him to change his view of life and attitude toward Zhu Xi 주희(朱熹, 1130-1200) Learning.
He did not convert to Yangming Learning, the tendency toward the learning of the mind.
Seoae’s thought and learning, which differed from Toegye’s other disciples, was formed during the existential crisis he confronted during the Imjin War. Zhu Xi Learning has been criticized for its lack of practicality and its absorption in ideological factionalism. Despite such criticisms, Zhu Xi learning is not impractical as its essential message lies in cultivating oneself with practical concerns. Even the Practical Leaerning (실학 實學) of the Late Joseon should not be considered antithetical to Zhu Xi Learning but the full blossoming of its practical mind and learning. Likewise, Seoae’s learning and thought could be considered the extension of Teogye’s practical spirit. The contest between Galam and Han Zhu over Seoae’s theory of spiritual sovereignty shows the ways in which they succeeded Teoye’s philosophy of li 理. However, it should be undeniable that Seoae was the legitimate heir to Toegye’s Learning and that his thought was firmed rooted in Toegye.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 홍원식, "서애 유성룡의 양명학에 대한 관심과 퇴계심학의 전개" 한국양명학회 31 : 2012
2 최재목, "退溪의 陽明學觀에 대하여-退溪의 독자적 心學 형성 과정에 대한 一試論-" 퇴계학연구원 113 : 2003
3 "退溪全書"
4 "退溪先生文集"
5 김용재, "西崖 柳成龍의 陽明學 理解와 批判에 關한 考察" 한국양명학회 23 : 2009
6 "西厓集"
7 문석윤, "西厓 柳成龍의 「主宰說」에 대하여" 경북대 퇴계연구소 55 : 2018
8 최종호, "西厓 柳成龍의 陽明學 批判" 동아인문학회 38 : 2017
9 "朱子語類"
10 "孟子集註"
1 홍원식, "서애 유성룡의 양명학에 대한 관심과 퇴계심학의 전개" 한국양명학회 31 : 2012
2 최재목, "退溪의 陽明學觀에 대하여-退溪의 독자적 心學 형성 과정에 대한 一試論-" 퇴계학연구원 113 : 2003
3 "退溪全書"
4 "退溪先生文集"
5 김용재, "西崖 柳成龍의 陽明學 理解와 批判에 關한 考察" 한국양명학회 23 : 2009
6 "西厓集"
7 문석윤, "西厓 柳成龍의 「主宰說」에 대하여" 경북대 퇴계연구소 55 : 2018
8 최종호, "西厓 柳成龍의 陽明學 批判" 동아인문학회 38 : 2017
9 "朱子語類"
10 "孟子集註"
11 "孟子"
12 "二程遺書"
13 "中庸"
14 김도형, "19세기 후반 河回 屛儒의家學과 斥邪 활동" 경북대 퇴계연구소 55 : 2018
15 김형수, "17세기 초 안동지역 사회의 재편과 서애학단의 활동" 경북대 퇴계연구소 55 : 2018
류성룡의 전인적 리더십 연구 - 에니어그램 성격진단을 중심으로 (2)
류성룡 ‘문충’ 증시(贈諡)에 대한 김장생의 반대와 그 배경
서애 류성룡의 『주역』 이해와 활용 - 지화명이(地火明夷) 괘를 중심으로