RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      서애(西厓)의 ‘심(心)’ 이해에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Understanding of the Mind of Seo-ae

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109091959

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Seoae Ryu Seong-ryong (柳成龍, 1542-1607), a representative student of Toegye Yi Hwang (李滉, 1502-1571), was an accomplished statecraft thinker despite the lack of scholarship on this issue. As is well-known, he served as prime minister during the Imjin War (1592-1598).
      Even in his late years, Seoae continued to emphasize the importance of the mind, in which he differed from Toegye’s other disciples who doggedly focused on the Learning of Principle (lixue 理學). It was indeed the most important aspect of his learning; however, he was also guarded against falling into the learning of Wang Yangming (王陽明, 1472-1529). His interests in Yangming Learning and Buddhism grew in response to the Imjin War, which prompted him to change his view of life and attitude toward Zhu Xi 주희(朱熹, 1130-1200) Learning.
      He did not convert to Yangming Learning, the tendency toward the learning of the mind.
      Seoae’s thought and learning, which differed from Toegye’s other disciples, was formed during the existential crisis he confronted during the Imjin War. Zhu Xi Learning has been criticized for its lack of practicality and its absorption in ideological factionalism. Despite such criticisms, Zhu Xi learning is not impractical as its essential message lies in cultivating oneself with practical concerns. Even the Practical Leaerning (실학 實學) of the Late Joseon should not be considered antithetical to Zhu Xi Learning but the full blossoming of its practical mind and learning. Likewise, Seoae’s learning and thought could be considered the extension of Teogye’s practical spirit. The contest between Galam and Han Zhu over Seoae’s theory of spiritual sovereignty shows the ways in which they succeeded Teoye’s philosophy of li 理. However, it should be undeniable that Seoae was the legitimate heir to Toegye’s Learning and that his thought was firmed rooted in Toegye.
      번역하기

      Seoae Ryu Seong-ryong (柳成龍, 1542-1607), a representative student of Toegye Yi Hwang (李滉, 1502-1571), was an accomplished statecraft thinker despite the lack of scholarship on this issue. As is well-known, he served as prime minister during t...

      Seoae Ryu Seong-ryong (柳成龍, 1542-1607), a representative student of Toegye Yi Hwang (李滉, 1502-1571), was an accomplished statecraft thinker despite the lack of scholarship on this issue. As is well-known, he served as prime minister during the Imjin War (1592-1598).
      Even in his late years, Seoae continued to emphasize the importance of the mind, in which he differed from Toegye’s other disciples who doggedly focused on the Learning of Principle (lixue 理學). It was indeed the most important aspect of his learning; however, he was also guarded against falling into the learning of Wang Yangming (王陽明, 1472-1529). His interests in Yangming Learning and Buddhism grew in response to the Imjin War, which prompted him to change his view of life and attitude toward Zhu Xi 주희(朱熹, 1130-1200) Learning.
      He did not convert to Yangming Learning, the tendency toward the learning of the mind.
      Seoae’s thought and learning, which differed from Toegye’s other disciples, was formed during the existential crisis he confronted during the Imjin War. Zhu Xi Learning has been criticized for its lack of practicality and its absorption in ideological factionalism. Despite such criticisms, Zhu Xi learning is not impractical as its essential message lies in cultivating oneself with practical concerns. Even the Practical Leaerning (실학 實學) of the Late Joseon should not be considered antithetical to Zhu Xi Learning but the full blossoming of its practical mind and learning. Likewise, Seoae’s learning and thought could be considered the extension of Teogye’s practical spirit. The contest between Galam and Han Zhu over Seoae’s theory of spiritual sovereignty shows the ways in which they succeeded Teoye’s philosophy of li 理. However, it should be undeniable that Seoae was the legitimate heir to Toegye’s Learning and that his thought was firmed rooted in Toegye.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼