RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인공와우 환자의 범주 지각에 대한 행동적 지각과 신경학적 상관성 = Behavioral Perception and Neural Correlates of Categorical Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105058511

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background and Objectives Although many cochlear implant (CI) recipients receive significant benefits from using the implants, speech perception ability is still known to vary among CI users, and the variability is closely related to the ability of users to process temporal information. As one of the important temporal cues for speech perception in CI users, voice onset time (VOT) can be used to examine behavioral perception and neural correlates of temporal processing. In this study, we measured categorical perception and N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using a /ba/-/pa/ VOT continuum in CI users as well as in normal-hearing (NH) listeners.
      Subjects and Method Ten CI subjects and 11 NH controls participated in syllable identification tasks and in electroencephalography recording. CI subjects were divided into two groups, which were ‘good’ and ‘poor’ performers based on their speech perception scores. The stimuli used in both experiments were a synthetic /ba/-/pa/ VOT continuum. The identification boundary and N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude were measured for each subject group.
      Results Behavioral results revealed that poor CI performers had a delayed identification boundary compared to NH listeners and good CI performers. However, N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes in both good and poor CI performers were significantly smaller than those in NH group.
      Conclusion N1-P2 amplitudes reflected decreased auditory cortical activity of temporal cues in CI users. The categorical perception of good CI performers was similar to that of NH listeners, whereas their cortical responses were decreased to the level similar to that of poor CI performers. This finding indicates that CAEPs would be more sensitive to altered temporal processing of CI users than to behavioral measures.
      Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2018;61(1):15-23
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives Although many cochlear implant (CI) recipients receive significant benefits from using the implants, speech perception ability is still known to vary among CI users, and the variability is closely related to the ability of us...

      Background and Objectives Although many cochlear implant (CI) recipients receive significant benefits from using the implants, speech perception ability is still known to vary among CI users, and the variability is closely related to the ability of users to process temporal information. As one of the important temporal cues for speech perception in CI users, voice onset time (VOT) can be used to examine behavioral perception and neural correlates of temporal processing. In this study, we measured categorical perception and N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using a /ba/-/pa/ VOT continuum in CI users as well as in normal-hearing (NH) listeners.
      Subjects and Method Ten CI subjects and 11 NH controls participated in syllable identification tasks and in electroencephalography recording. CI subjects were divided into two groups, which were ‘good’ and ‘poor’ performers based on their speech perception scores. The stimuli used in both experiments were a synthetic /ba/-/pa/ VOT continuum. The identification boundary and N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude were measured for each subject group.
      Results Behavioral results revealed that poor CI performers had a delayed identification boundary compared to NH listeners and good CI performers. However, N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes in both good and poor CI performers were significantly smaller than those in NH group.
      Conclusion N1-P2 amplitudes reflected decreased auditory cortical activity of temporal cues in CI users. The categorical perception of good CI performers was similar to that of NH listeners, whereas their cortical responses were decreased to the level similar to that of poor CI performers. This finding indicates that CAEPs would be more sensitive to altered temporal processing of CI users than to behavioral measures.
      Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2018;61(1):15-23

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Dorman MF, "Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant" 43 (43): 585-601, 1991

      2 Roman S, "Voice onset time encoding in patients with left and right cochlear implants" 15 (15): 601-605, 2004

      3 Kraus N, "The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users" 65 (65): 118-124, 1993

      4 Burger M, "The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms" 30 (30): 16-22, 2009

      5 Naatanen R, "The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure" 24 (24): 375-425, 1987

      6 Tremblay KL, "Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds" 24 (24): 225-232, 2003

      7 Gordon-Salant S, "Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners" 36 (36): 1276-1285, 1993

      8 Groenen PA, "Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users" 30 (30): 31-40, 2001

      9 Luo X, "Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users" 29 (29): 957-970, 2008

      10 Nie K, "Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception" 27 (27): 208-217, 2006

      1 Dorman MF, "Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant" 43 (43): 585-601, 1991

      2 Roman S, "Voice onset time encoding in patients with left and right cochlear implants" 15 (15): 601-605, 2004

      3 Kraus N, "The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users" 65 (65): 118-124, 1993

      4 Burger M, "The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms" 30 (30): 16-22, 2009

      5 Naatanen R, "The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure" 24 (24): 375-425, 1987

      6 Tremblay KL, "Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds" 24 (24): 225-232, 2003

      7 Gordon-Salant S, "Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners" 36 (36): 1276-1285, 1993

      8 Groenen PA, "Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users" 30 (30): 31-40, 2001

      9 Luo X, "Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users" 29 (29): 957-970, 2008

      10 Nie K, "Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception" 27 (27): 208-217, 2006

      11 Lisker L, "Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops" 10 (10): 1-28, 1967

      12 Rubinstein JT, "Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria" 20 (20): 445-452, 1999

      13 Steinschneider M, "Physiologic correlates of the voice onset time boundary in primary auditory cortex (A1) of the awake monkey: temporal response patterns" 48 (48): 326-340, 1995

      14 Liberman AM, "Perception of the speech code" 74 (74): 431-461, 1967

      15 Tong Y, "P2 enhancement from auditory discrimination training is associated with improved reaction times" 1297 : 80-88, 2009

      16 Sharma A, "Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception" 107 (107): 2697-2703, 2000

      17 Sinex DG, "Neural correlates of nonmonotonic temporal acuity for voice onset time" 90 (90): 2441-2449, 1991

      18 Ponton CW, "Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use" 5 (5): 167-185, 2000

      19 Harris KC, "Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed" 33 (33): 330-339, 2012

      20 Terence Picton, "Human auditory evoked potentials" Plural Publishing 30-, 2011

      21 Rubinstein JT, "How cochlear implants encode speech" 12 (12): 444-448, 2004

      22 Holden LK, "Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants" 34 (34): 342-360, 2013

      23 Iverson P, "Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users" 113 (113): 1056-1064, 2003

      24 Shahin A, "Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians" 23 (23): 5545-5552, 2003

      25 Kelly AS, "Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users" 116 (116): 1235-1246, 2005

      26 Bharadwaj SV, "Efficacy of the discreteness of voicing category (DOVC) measure for characterizing voicing errors in children with cochlear implants: a report" 51 (51): 629-635, 2008

      27 Tremblay KL, "Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues" 114 (114): 1332-1343, 2003

      28 Delorme A, "EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis" 134 (134): 9-21, 2004

      29 Pantev C, "Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study" 16 (16): 31-36, 2006

      30 Lee DS, "Deafness: cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants" 409 : 149-150, 2001

      31 Sharma A, "Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time" 106 (106): 1078-1083, 1999

      32 Faulkner A, "Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception" 106 (106): 2063-2073, 1999

      33 Tremblay K, "Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training" 22 (22): 79-90, 2001

      34 Horev N, "Categorical Perception of Speech (VOT) and Analogous Non-Speech (FOT) signals: behavioral and electrophysiological correlates" 28 (28): 111-128, 2007

      35 Tremblay KL, "Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans" 120 (120): 128-135, 2009

      36 Dimitrijevic A, "Auditory cortical activity in normal hearing subjects to consonant vowels presented in quiet and in noise" 124 (124): 1204-1215, 2013

      37 Tye-Murray N, "Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users" 10 (10): 292-298, 1989

      38 Flege JE, "Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language" 89 (89): 395-411, 1991

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-04-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학 -> 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery -> Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
      KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-06-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery -> Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-06-14 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society Of Otolaryngology -> Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head &N -> Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.13 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼