문학,문화 : 일제말기 근대비판 담론의 시간성 연구: 세계사,전통,비상시 = Articles : A Study of Temporality of a Critical Discourse on the Modern in the Late Japanese Colonial Period

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the late Japanese colonial period, from the Sino-Japanese War until the Pacific War, critical discourses on the modern were prevalent in Japan and the Joseon. Despite the absence of a consensus about the specific definition of the modern, most thinkers agreed that the modern was something to be overcome. While some regarded naturalism and capitalism of the West as the essence of the modern, some others named scientism and humanism as the nature of the western modernity. Additionally, some criticized the temporal concept of historicism and brought new meanings of ``tradition`` into relief, and some others advocated overcoming ``the West inherent in us``. This study is to consider the temporality of the theory of overcoming the modern focusing on the following three notions-world history, tradition, and emergency-, and examines the antinomy of them. The first notion to consider is ``world history``. The theorists of overcoming the modern, including the Kyoto school, discarded the progressive ideology that had led the Western modern history, and instead introduced ``world history`` as a new notion. Although this resulted from the imperialistic embracement of the theories of Ranke, a major positivist historian from Germany, it contained antinomy of remaining in ``history`` which was the modern temporal view. The second notion is ``tradition``. While the critical mind of ``world history`` brought ``time of world`` into question in the context of temporal realization, the notion of ``tradition`` was to understand ``time of history`` itself as the modern and overcome it. The critical mind of the notion involves the attempts to criticize regarding history as a ``progressive`` process and to discover tradition as ``the present past`` or ``the eternal present``. However, it also contained antinomy; the ``tradition`` here was a notion that was created in the modern times, not passed down from ancient times. The third notion to consider is ``emergency``, which was a method to define the present time as a transition period toward a new era, relating to states of war. However, the theorists of overcoming the modern did not regard ``emergency`` as a particular time that strayed from normal states, instead they thought is as ``a regularized exceptional state``, namely ``a state in which exceptions have become regulations``. However, the notion also contained antinomy since the word ``emergency`` connotes abnormality.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 나카무라 미츠오, "태평양 전쟁의 사상" 이매진 2007

2 라인하르트 코젤렉, "코젤렉의 개념사 사전 2:진보" 푸른역사 2010

3 서승희, "최재서 비평의 문화 담론 연구" 이화여대 2009

4 한 식, "조선문학과 동양적 과제, In 한국 근대 일본어 평론·좌담회선집" 역락 2009

5 서인식, In 서인식 전집 1, "전통론" 역락 2006

6 다케우치 요시미, "일본과 아시아" 소명출판 2004

7 "인문평론"

8 김기림, "우리 신문학과 근대의식, In 김기림 전집 2" 심설당 1988

9 도면회, "역사학의 세기 -20세기 한국과 일본의 역사학-" 휴머니스트 2009

10 "신시대"

11 정종현, "식민지 후반기(1937~1945)한국문학에 나타난 동양론 연구" 동국대 2005

12 노상래, "근대초극론, 아직 끝나지 않은 공영권총력전" 동아인문학회 1 (1): 733-766, 2006

13 히로마쓰 와타루, "근대초극론" 민음사 2003

14 "국민문학"

15 차승기, "‘근대의 위기’와 시간-공간의 정치학: 교토학파 역사철학자들과 서인식" 4 (4): 2003