RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      College Students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment in Group Oral Presentations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107039046

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of the present study is to examine the perceptions of Korean university students on peer assessment in group oral presentations and investigate the correlation between students’ perceptions and their final course grade and between studen...

      The purpose of the present study is to examine the perceptions of Korean university students on peer assessment in group oral presentations and investigate the correlation between students’ perceptions and their final course grade and between students’ perceptions and each student’s year in college. A total of 27 students, who enrolled in an English language course participated in the study. They were required to give a group oral presentation and also were asked to assess the group presentations given by their peers using a rubric. Then they completed a questionnaire. In order to analyze the data, a t-test and correlation were performed. Findings revealed that students who had their pre-university education through the medium of English were more favorable to peer assessment activity, indicating students should get awarded a different score based on their performance in a group presentation. However, the students who had all their previous education by the medium of Korean preferred that all members in a group should get awarded the same mark, and they found peer assessment challenging. In addition, the correlation between the perceptions of students and their final grades showed a weak relationship in general. Also, the correlation between the perceptions of students and their year in college was also weakly correlated. Despite the different views of the two groups, they preferred peer assessment to teacher assessment only in group oral presentations.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. INTRODUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW III. METHOD IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION V. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS REFERENCES
      • I. INTRODUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW III. METHOD IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION V. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS REFERENCES
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Wen, M. L., "University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward(online)peer assessment" 51 : 27-44, 2006

      2 Kwan, K., "Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in simulation training exercise" 21 (21): 205-214, 1996

      3 Patri, M., "The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills" 19 (19): 109-131, 2002

      4 De Grez, L., "The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills" 24 (24): 293-306, 2009

      5 Ahangari, S., "The effect of peer assessment on oral presentation in an EFL context" 2 (2): 45-53, 2013

      6 김훈밀, "Systematic Analyses of Peer and Teacher Feedback: Korean University Students vs. Native English Instructor" 한국영어교과교육학회 12 (12): 261-282, 2013

      7 Carvalho, A., "Students’ perceptions of fairness in peer assessment : Evidence from a problem-based learning course" 18 (18): 491-505, 2013

      8 White, E., "Student perspectives of peer assessment for learning in a public speaking course" 33 : 1-31, 2009

      9 Llado, A. P., "Student perceptions of peer assessment : An interdisciplinary study" 39 (39): 592-610, 2014

      10 Elliott, N., "Self and peer assessment does it make a difference to student group work?" 5 (5): 40-48, 2005

      1 Wen, M. L., "University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward(online)peer assessment" 51 : 27-44, 2006

      2 Kwan, K., "Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in simulation training exercise" 21 (21): 205-214, 1996

      3 Patri, M., "The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills" 19 (19): 109-131, 2002

      4 De Grez, L., "The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills" 24 (24): 293-306, 2009

      5 Ahangari, S., "The effect of peer assessment on oral presentation in an EFL context" 2 (2): 45-53, 2013

      6 김훈밀, "Systematic Analyses of Peer and Teacher Feedback: Korean University Students vs. Native English Instructor" 한국영어교과교육학회 12 (12): 261-282, 2013

      7 Carvalho, A., "Students’ perceptions of fairness in peer assessment : Evidence from a problem-based learning course" 18 (18): 491-505, 2013

      8 White, E., "Student perspectives of peer assessment for learning in a public speaking course" 33 : 1-31, 2009

      9 Llado, A. P., "Student perceptions of peer assessment : An interdisciplinary study" 39 (39): 592-610, 2014

      10 Elliott, N., "Self and peer assessment does it make a difference to student group work?" 5 (5): 40-48, 2005

      11 Freeman, M., "SPARK, a confident web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork : Benefits of evaluating across different subjects" 33 (33): 551-569, 2002

      12 Weaver, W., "Peer evaluation : A case study" 11 : 25-39, 1986

      13 Langan, A. M., "Peer assessment of oral presentations : Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria" 30 (30): 21-34, 2005

      14 De Grez, L., "Peer assessment of oral presentation skills" 2 : 1176-1780, 2010

      15 Cheng, W., "Peer assessment of language proficiency" 22 (22): 93-121, 2005

      16 Magin, D., "Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they?" 26 (26): 287-298, 2001

      17 김훈밀, "Learner-directed evaluation in college English speaking class: Can peer assessment supplement teacher assessment?" 팬코리아영어교육학회 27 (27): 131-151, 2015

      18 Dubois, R., "Implementation of rubrics and formative peer assessment in an EFL context" Sookmyung Women’s University 2018

      19 Cheng, W., "Having second thoughts : Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise" 22 (22): 233-239, 1997

      20 Aryadoust, V., "Gender and academic major bias in peer assessment of oral presentations" 13 (13): 1-24, 2016

      21 Chaqmaqchee, Z. A., "Empowering learning : Students and teachers outlook on peer assessment for oral presentation" 6 (6): 75-81, 2015

      22 강은영, "Effects of Peer Feedback on L2 Students’ Writing" 한국영어교과교육학회 18 (18): 31-49, 2019

      23 Saito, H., "EFL classroom peer assessment : Training effects on rating and commenting" 8 (8): 31-54, 2008

      24 Ballantyne, K., "Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process" 27 (27): 427-441, 2002

      25 Jafarpur, A., "Can naive EFL learners estimate their own proficiency?" 5 : 145-157, 1991

      26 Black, P., "Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice" Open University Press 2003

      27 Black, P., "Assessment and learning" Sage Publications 9-26, 2006

      28 Chung, A. H. T., "A study on the effects of assessment instructions on peer assessment and self assessment in a university English presentation class" Kongju National University 2014

      29 Mok, J., "A case study of students’ perceptions of peer assessment in Hong Kong" 65 (65): 230-239, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.78 0.81 1.48 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼