RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasound Alone and Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combination on Surveillance in High-Risk Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma = Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasound Alone and Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combination on Surveillance in High-Risk Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107095304

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Aims: Many guidelines suggest ultrasonography at six-month intervals for patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, surveillance is often performed by combining ultrasound with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonan...

      Aims: Many guidelines suggest ultrasonography at six-month intervals for patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, surveillance is often performed by combining ultrasound with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes depending on whether the patients had imaging tests other than ultrasound as a surveillance test.
      Methods: Patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis at Seoul National University Hospital from 2010 to 2014 were included. Patients diagnosed with other cancers or with surveillance intervals shorter or longer than 6±1 month were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who only had ultrasound scans (USG group) and those who had a combination of ultrasound, CT, and MRI. (combination group). Propensity score matching was applied to adjust the difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The difference of HCC detection, liver-related mortality and all-cause mortality between the two groups was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. The difference in the stages at HCC diagnosis between the two groups was compared using Fisher’s exact test.
      Results: From a total of 4,779 patients, we obtained a propensity score matched cohort of 794 patients. The combination group showed a higher risk of HCC detection than the USG group. (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-3.54) The combination group showed more very early stages at the time of HCC diagnosis based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. (Fisher’s exact test P=0.03). Liver-related mortality (aHR 2.00; 95% CI 0.53-7.56) and all-cause mortality (aHR 1.06; 95% CI 0.49-2.26) were not significantly different between the two groups.
      Conclusions: Combining ultrasound, CT, and MRI as a surveillance test may detect HCC in earlier stages.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼