플라톤 파우사니아스의 궤변술을 통해 본 에로스와 노모스 = Eros and Nomos in the Sophistry of Plato`s Pausanias

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present paper attempts to show that my critical interpretations concerned with Plato`s Pausanias have condemned him as a sophist who makes a perverted use of morality to achieve his real goal, a legitimate of paiderastia. In articulating logical contradictions and fallacies related to the arguments of nous, license, and virtues in Pausanias` speech his sophistry is chiefly used to legalize his paiderastia with Agathon as his eromenos. His sophistic, subtle cleverness to maximize his own erotic profit as a erastes, however, might not so much to present the positive attitude to the paiderastia obviously as to conceal his underlying credo concerning the revision of Athens` nomos. The revolutionary aspects of Plato`s Pausanias are revealed in supporting the overridingness of his private range for the public field. Through my elenchos I argue that there are his many immoral and illogical statements in his speech. In the arguments of nous, license, and virtues, he is gradually falling to abyss because of the serious logical fallacy, the incompatibility of his paiderastia with those thesis: To love beautifully is to love the intellectual persons, more intellectual adult than a paidika is preferred and therefore his paiderastia can`t be maintained. License is incompatible with slavery in his paiderastia. Lastly, to slave voluntarily so as to acquire the virtues is also conflicted with his paiderastia. In particular the conception of a voluntary slavery makes an eromenos merely a receptacle. Pausanias` sophistry is related to the serious danger in existence of both individual and polis because in his paiderastic relationship physical reproduction can`t be possible. There is good reason to consult the Socrates-Diotima`s speech concerning the beauty in both the physical and the psychic as a means of reproduction.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강철웅, "향연" 이제이북스 2010

2 남경희, "플라톤: 서양철학의 기원과 토대" 아카넷 2006

3 플라톤, "프로타고라스, 라케스, 메논" 서광사 2010

4 투키디데스, "펠로폰네소스 전쟁사" 숲 2011

5 서동욱, "철학연습" 반비 2011

6 헤시오도스, "일과 날" 한길사 2004

7 헤로도토스, "역사" 숲 2009

8 임성철, "아리스토파네스의 희극적 비극 이야기(『향연』189a-193d)에 드러난 플라톤의 철학적 의도" 철학연구소 (31) : 31-68, 2006

9 헤시오도스, "신통기" 한길사 2004

10 아리스토파네스, "새, In 아리스토파네스의 희극" 단국대학교출판부 2004

11 플라톤, "법률" 서광사 2009

12 플라톤, "국가" 서광사 1997

13 Bury, R. G., "The “Symposium” of Plato. 2d ed" W. Heffer and Sons 1932

14 Dorter, Kenneth, "The Significance of the Speechs in Plato's Symposium" 2 : 215-234, 1969

15 Barker, Ernst, "The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle" Dover Publication Inc 1959

16 Anderson, Daniel E, "The Masks of Dionysos: A Commentary on Plato's “Symposium.”" State University of New York Press 1993

17 Rosen, Stanley, "Plato’s “Symposium.” 2d ed" Yale University Press 1987

18 Hecht, Jamey, "Plato’s Symposium: Eros and the Human Predicament" Twayne Publishers 1999

19 Corrigan, Kevin, "Plato’s Dialectic at Play: Argument, Structure, and Myth in the ‘Symposium’" The Pennsylvania State University Press 2004

20 Dover K. J., "Plato: Symposium" Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics 1980

21 Dover K. J., "Plato, Greek Homosexuality" Harvard University Press 1989

22 Grube, G. M. A., "Plato's Thought" Methuen 1958

23 Stern, Herold, S., "Plato's Socratic Philosophy" The Edwin Mellen Press 2002

24 Neumann, Harry, "On the Sophistry of Plato's Pausanias" 261-267, 1964

25 Strauss, Leo, "Leo Strauss on Plato's Symposium, edited and with a Foreword by Seth Benardete" The University of Chicago Press 2001

26 Neu, Jerome, "A Tear Is an Intellectual Thing" Oxford University Press 2000