In 2008, it was one of the big news that new government tried to change the legal framework of information and telecommunication. Unfortunately, the change was not originated from the argument that had raised by scholars and officials, but from the in...
In 2008, it was one of the big news that new government tried to change the legal framework of information and telecommunication. Unfortunately, the change was not originated from the argument that had raised by scholars and officials, but from the influence of political situation and reason. Ironically, the change included some issues which had raised to be resolved and reformed.
The procedure of reform, however, was not wholly proper. Specially, decreasing the simple number of law might make a new problem that some acts could not be together because the object and substance of the acts were not similar. An amendment which is prepared in haste cannot operate properly.
The convergence of broadcasting and telecommunication was not supported by the exact analysis of the circumstance and system, either. It is true that government have not made enough effort to appropriate architecture of regulation for the layers of network.
Although the change of legal framework of information and communication may be encouraged by non-legal reason, such as political reason, As Atiyah discussed, the change must include the arguments which have been already raised. Therefore, scholars and officials should study and discuss the issues of information and communcation laws and should be concern about the movement of legal framework for information society and network.