대한제국기 충주군 양안을 통해서 본 연원마을 = The village of Yeonwon through the land survey registers of Chungju-gun under the Great Han Empire

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to the land survey registers of Chungju-gun under the Great Han Empire, there was a total of 30.533 gyeol of paddy fields and dry fields in the village of Yeonwon. The total of dry fields was 18.887 gyeol which was about 61.2% of paddy fields and dry fields, and the rate was higher than Bukbyeon-meonwon and Chungju-gun. Although the rate of paddy fields in the village of Yeonwon was similar to the villages of Gaheung and Donwol, it was different to the village of Yongan. It was same to Yeoktos. And the higher land grade of the village of Yeonwon was similar to the villages Gaheung and Yongan, but the land grade of village of Donwol was lower than other villages. But The villages of Yeonwon, Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan with station in Chungju-gun were similar to the high rate of Yeoktos of paddy fields and dry fields.
There were 88 houses with 3 tile-roofed houses and 85 thatched cottages in the village of Yeonwon. A tile-roofed house with 30 kan was building of the station of Yeonwon until 1895. The rate of the thatched cottages of 2 kan and 3 kan in the villages of Yeonwon, Donwol and Yongan was much higher than other thatched cottages. However the rate of the thatched cottages of 2 kan in the village of Gaheung was lower than other village, because the traffic and commercial business in the village of Gaheung was more better than other villages. And the japan's market and base facilities in the village of Gaheung showed japan's imperialism. But the villages of Yeonwon, Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan in Chungju-gun were similar to the high rate of house close connection with station.
There were 85 farmers in the villages of Yeonwon. If we classify them by land ownership. a wealthy farmer was 10(about 24.1%) and a middle farmer was 13(about 24.1%) and a small farmer was 8(about 14.8%). and a poor farmer was 24(about 42.5%). But if we classify them by area under cultivation and land rented other. a wealthy farmer was 10(24.1%)→24(about 44.5%) and a middle farmer was 13(24.1%)→12(about 22.2%) and a small farmer was 8(about 14.8%)→ 10(about 18.5%), and a poor farmer was 24(about 42.5%)→8(about 14.5%). It showed that a wealthy farmer was much increased and a poor farmer was much decreased. And it was same to the villages of Gaheung, Donwol and Yongan. But there were 31 tenant farmer without land ownership in the village of Yeonwon. They were mostly poor. because the profit of tenant land was half that of their own land and the size of tenant land was small. It was same to other villages. Especially the most tenant farmers who lived the thatched cottages of 2 kan was in destitution.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 연원마을 전답의 면적과 등급
• Ⅲ. 연원마을의 가옥
• Ⅳ. 연원마을 주민의 토지소유와 경작형태
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서태원, "한말 진천군 역토의 구조와 운용" 호서사학회 39 (39): 33-54, 2004

2 조병로, "한국역제사"

3 예성문화연구회.충주시, "충주의지명"

4 金渭顯, "조선후기 嶺東驛站에 대한 일고찰" 6 : 1994

5 김용섭, "조선후기 농업사연구 [1］- 농촌경제 , 사회변동-" 일조각 144-, 1970

6 최호, "조선후기 驛村에 대한 일고찰 -단성현 호적대장을 중심으로" 4 : 1985

7 金渭顯, "조선후기 大昌驛에 대한 제문제" 7 : 1979

8 배기헌, "조선 후기 驛村에 대하여 -역촌의 내부구조 및 성격변화와 관련하여" 43 :

9 이영학, "대한제국의 토지조사사업" 민음사 21-27, 1995

10 이헌창, "대한제국기의 토지제도" 민음사 184-, 1990

11 이영학, "대한제국기 토지조사사업" 민음사 1990

12 최윤오, "대한제국기 충주군 양안의 지주제와 부농경영" 국학연구원 128 (128): 129-186, 2004

13 "대전회통"

14 "대동여지도"

15 김양식, "근대권력과 토지-역둔토 조사에서 불하까지-" 해남 164-166, 2004

16 신영우, "광무양안과 진천의 사회경제 변동" 혜안 2007

17 "경국대전"

18 서태원, "갑오개혁 이후 충청북도 지방군 ―청주지방대와 진위대를 중심으로―" 한국사연구회 136 (136): 259-286, 2007

19 "驛土所關査員訓指存"

20 趙炳魯, "韓國驛制史"

21 조병로, "韓國近世驛制史硏究"

22 "輿地圖書 上"

23 "湖西邑誌"

24 "忠淸道邑誌(英祖～憲宗年間)"

25 "忠淸南北道各郡報告"

26 "大典會通"

27 서인한, "壬辰戰亂史(民族戰亂史④)"

28 金容燮, "光武年間의 量田地契事業" 31 : 1968

29 "仁祖實錄"

30 정순옥, "19세기말 驛의 構成과 行政機能-경상도 幽谷驛관련 고문서를 중심으로" 10 : 2002

31 한기범, "17세기 驛屬人의 신분 적 지위 -단성호적 분석을 중심으로" 대전실업전문대 학․중경공업전문대학 13 : 1984