RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      R&D 투자의 수익률과 R&D 사업의 생산성, 효율성, 규모의 경제 및 범위의 경제 추정 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15934759

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        인천 : 인하대학교 대학원, 2021

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 인하대학교 대학원 , 산업경영공학과 , 2021. 8

      • 발행연도

        2021

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 발행국(도시)

        인천

      • 기타서명

        R&D 투자의 수익률과 R&D 사업의 생산성, 효율성, 규모의 경제 및 범위의 경제 추정 연구

      • 형태사항

        x, 127 p. : 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        인하대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        지도교수:오동현
        참고문헌: p.117-127

      • UCI식별코드

        I804:23009-200000501498

      • 소장기관
        • 인하대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this thesis is to provide comprehensive implications for national R&D activities in Korea. In particular, it provides policy-making direction by measuring returns to R&D for the efficient use of government R&D expenditure. In addition, comprehensive policy implications were derived from measuring productivity, efficiency, economies of scale and scope for national R&D programs.
      First, the returns to R&D were estimated using industry-level data. The empirical analysis was conducted for the Korean manufacturing industry from 2006 to 2017.
      Second, the productivity of the national R&D program was analyzed using a metafrontier approach that was assumed differently from the traditional technology convexity. The target of analysis was 6T groups, a promising future technology group, and analyzed using data from 2009 to 2018.
      Finally, efficiency, economies of scale and scope were measured using the input distance function based on stochastic frontier analysis.
      The main results are as follows: The average returns to R&D of the Korean manufacturing industry was 11.5 ~ 31.9%, and it was verified that it has gradually decreased during the analysis period. However, the returns to R&D of the Korean manufacturing industry has produced positive results, which can be seen as a profit effect from R&D investment. In addition, in the low-tech industry, returns to R&D decreased very rapidly during the analysis period, but in the case of the high-tech industry, it was confirmed that returns to R&D increased or maintained during the analysis period.
      The national R&D productivity conducted in the 6T groups was measured to increase by about 13.78% per year on average. This could be seen as a result of advances in metatechnology. In addition, it was confirmed that the recent R&D productivity has increased compared to the past, and the productivity of each group was improved.
      The R&D efficiency was measured at about 0.56, and about 72% of the programs had a low efficiency of less than 0.8. Most R&D programs were in the diseconomies of scale, and economies of scale emerged from programs that invested more than 40 billion KRW in government research funding. Also, most R&D programs have demonstrated economies of scope. This shows that government funding is more efficient when diverse outputs are generated through R&D.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this thesis is to provide comprehensive implications for national R&D activities in Korea. In particular, it provides policy-making direction by measuring returns to R&D for the efficient use of government R&D expenditure. I...

      The purpose of this thesis is to provide comprehensive implications for national R&D activities in Korea. In particular, it provides policy-making direction by measuring returns to R&D for the efficient use of government R&D expenditure. In addition, comprehensive policy implications were derived from measuring productivity, efficiency, economies of scale and scope for national R&D programs.
      First, the returns to R&D were estimated using industry-level data. The empirical analysis was conducted for the Korean manufacturing industry from 2006 to 2017.
      Second, the productivity of the national R&D program was analyzed using a metafrontier approach that was assumed differently from the traditional technology convexity. The target of analysis was 6T groups, a promising future technology group, and analyzed using data from 2009 to 2018.
      Finally, efficiency, economies of scale and scope were measured using the input distance function based on stochastic frontier analysis.
      The main results are as follows: The average returns to R&D of the Korean manufacturing industry was 11.5 ~ 31.9%, and it was verified that it has gradually decreased during the analysis period. However, the returns to R&D of the Korean manufacturing industry has produced positive results, which can be seen as a profit effect from R&D investment. In addition, in the low-tech industry, returns to R&D decreased very rapidly during the analysis period, but in the case of the high-tech industry, it was confirmed that returns to R&D increased or maintained during the analysis period.
      The national R&D productivity conducted in the 6T groups was measured to increase by about 13.78% per year on average. This could be seen as a result of advances in metatechnology. In addition, it was confirmed that the recent R&D productivity has increased compared to the past, and the productivity of each group was improved.
      The R&D efficiency was measured at about 0.56, and about 72% of the programs had a low efficiency of less than 0.8. Most R&D programs were in the diseconomies of scale, and economies of scale emerged from programs that invested more than 40 billion KRW in government research funding. Also, most R&D programs have demonstrated economies of scope. This shows that government funding is more efficient when diverse outputs are generated through R&D.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Chapter 1 Overall Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research Background 1
      • 1.2 Research Objectives 5
      • 1.3 Thesis Structure 7
      • Chapter 2 Study on Estimation of the Returns to R&D From Korean Manufacturing Industry 8
      • Chapter 1 Overall Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research Background 1
      • 1.2 Research Objectives 5
      • 1.3 Thesis Structure 7
      • Chapter 2 Study on Estimation of the Returns to R&D From Korean Manufacturing Industry 8
      • 2.1 Introduction 8
      • 2.2 Literature Review 10
      • 2.3 Methodology 14
      • 2.3.1 Returns to R&D estimation model using Cobb-Douglas production function 14
      • 2.3.2 Methodology of coefficient estimation using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) 17
      • 2.4 Description of Data 21
      • 2.5 Empirical Results 24
      • 2.5.1 Result of coefficient estimation 26
      • 2.5.2 Empirical Results of the Returns to R&D 29
      • 2.5.2.1 Result of the returns to R&D by year 29
      • 2.5.2.2 Result of the returns to R&D by industry 32
      • 2.6 Conclusion 35
      • Chapter 3 Productivity of the National R&D Programs of 6T Sector Using a Metafrontier Malmquist Productivity Index 39
      • 3.1 Introduction 39
      • 3.2 Literature Review 43
      • 3.3 Methodology 50
      • 3.3.1 Metafrontier and convexification strategy 50
      • 3.3.2 Metafrontier methodology 52
      • 3.3.2.1 Technology and technology-specific frontier, metatechnology and metafrontier 52
      • 3.3.2.2 Technical efficiency 55
      • 3.3.2.3 Metafrontier productivity index 56
      • 3.4 Description of the Data 60
      • 3.5 Empirical Results 65
      • 3.5.1 Productivity and decompositions of 6T 65
      • 3.5.2 Trend of the MMI index and decompositions 75
      • 3.6 Conclusion 78
      • Chapter 4 Efficiency, Scale and Scope Economies of Korean R&D Program 80
      • 4.1 Introduction 80
      • 4.2 Literature Review 81
      • 4.3 Methodology 87
      • 4.3.1 Definition of input distance function and estimation of input distance function 87
      • 4.3.2 Technical efficiency based on input distance function 91
      • 4.3.3 Scale economies 91
      • 4.3.4 Scope economies 94
      • 4.4 Description of Data 96
      • 4.5 Empirical Results 98
      • 4.5.1 Estimate results of the distance function 98
      • 4.5.2 Results of Efficiency, Economies of Scale, and Economies of Scope 100
      • 4.6 Conclusion 106
      • Chapter 5 Overall Conclusion 108
      • Appendix 113
      • References 117
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference) 논문관계도

      1 Griliches , Z.1994 . ProductivityR & D, "the data constraint", The American economic review84 ( 1 ) , 1-23, null

      2 C. B., "Rates of return to R &", D investment in the Philippines ( No . 1999-24 ) . PIDS Discussion Paper Series, 1999

      3 S. C.Lovell C. A. K., "Stochastic Frontier Analysis", Cambridge University Press , New York, 2000

      4 HallB. H.Mairesse , J.Mohnen , P., "Measuring the Returns to R & D", 2010

      5 JonesC. I.WilliamsJ. C., "Measuring the social return to R & D", The Quarterly Journal of Economics113 ( 4 ) , 1119-1135, 1998

      6 Kwon , H. U., "Measuring the rate of return to R & D", interindustry R & D spillovers in Korean manufacturing industries . Hitotsubashi journal of economics 49-57, 2003

      7 rrellM. J ., "The measurement of productive efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society : Series A ( General ) 120 ( 3 ) , 253-281, 1957

      8 Ejermo , O., "Productivity Spillovers of R & D in Sweden", Royal Institute of Technology , CESIS-Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, 2004

      9 Cho , Y.2004 . R, "D Spillover Effects in Korean Manufacturing Industries", Korea Review of Applied Economics 6 ( 1 ) , 209-232, null

      10 Casu , B.Ferrari , A.Zhao , T., "Regulatory reform and productivity change in Indian banking", Review of Economics and Statistics 95 ( 3 ) , 1066-1077, 2013

      1 Griliches , Z.1994 . ProductivityR & D, "the data constraint", The American economic review84 ( 1 ) , 1-23, null

      2 C. B., "Rates of return to R &", D investment in the Philippines ( No . 1999-24 ) . PIDS Discussion Paper Series, 1999

      3 S. C.Lovell C. A. K., "Stochastic Frontier Analysis", Cambridge University Press , New York, 2000

      4 HallB. H.Mairesse , J.Mohnen , P., "Measuring the Returns to R & D", 2010

      5 JonesC. I.WilliamsJ. C., "Measuring the social return to R & D", The Quarterly Journal of Economics113 ( 4 ) , 1119-1135, 1998

      6 Kwon , H. U., "Measuring the rate of return to R & D", interindustry R & D spillovers in Korean manufacturing industries . Hitotsubashi journal of economics 49-57, 2003

      7 rrellM. J ., "The measurement of productive efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society : Series A ( General ) 120 ( 3 ) , 253-281, 1957

      8 Ejermo , O., "Productivity Spillovers of R & D in Sweden", Royal Institute of Technology , CESIS-Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, 2004

      9 Cho , Y.2004 . R, "D Spillover Effects in Korean Manufacturing Industries", Korea Review of Applied Economics 6 ( 1 ) , 209-232, null

      10 Casu , B.Ferrari , A.Zhao , T., "Regulatory reform and productivity change in Indian banking", Review of Economics and Statistics 95 ( 3 ) , 1066-1077, 2013

      11 Bloom , N.Schankerman , M.van ReenenJ., "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry", Econometrica 81 ( 4 ) , 1347-1393, 2013

      12 Li , S.Marinc , M., "Economies of scale and scope in financial market infrastructures", Journal of International Financial MarketsInstitutions and Money 53 , 17-49, 2018

      13 D. H.LeeJ. D., "A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index", Empirical economics 38 ( 1 ) , 47-64, 2010

      14 ChenS. S.ChenY. S.LiangW. L.Wang , Y., "D spillover effects and firm performance following R & D increases", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 48 ( 5 ) , 1607-1634, 2013

      15 Han , J., "Measuring Social Returns to R & D and Two Countervailing Spillovers", KDI Policy Study , 18, 2018

      16 YeoI. K.JohnsonR. A., "A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry", Biometrika 87 ( 4 ) , 954-959 . KOSIS : Korea Statistical Information Service , ( http : //kosis.kr/, 2000

      17 Aigner , D. , LovellC. K.Schmidt , P., "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models", Journal of econometrics6 ( 1 ) , 21-37, 1977

      18 C. W.TingC. T.LinC. H.LinC. T., "Measuring non-convex metafrontier efficiency in international tourist hotels", Journal of the Operational Research Society 64 ( 2 ) , 250-259, 2013

      19 Growitsch , C.Wetzel , H., "Testing for economies of scope in European railways : an efficiency analysis", Journal of Transport Economics andPolicy 43 ( 1 ) , 1-24, 2009

      20 Cincera , M.Veugelers , R., "Differences in the rates of return to R & D for European and US young leading", 2014

      21 KimS. J.JooY. J., "Economies of Scale and Scope in Daejon Citys Medical Services Industry in Korea", Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association 15 ( 3 ) , 81-105, 2003

      22 ParkJ. H.Shin , K., "Efficiency of government-sponsored R & D projects : A metafrontier DEA approach", Sustainability 10 ( 7 ) , 2316, 2018

      23 OliverM. E., "Economies of scale and scope in expansion of the US natural gas pipeline network", Energy Economics52 , 265-276, 2015

      24 Chang , M. C.HuJ. L.ChenC. H., "A metafrontier pollution efficiency analysis of Taiwan ` s administrative regions", Journal of Cleaner Production 222 , 393-406, 2019

      25 O ` DonnellC. J., "An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change", Journal of Productivity Analysis 38 , 255 ? 272, 2012

      26 Chang , M. C., "An application of total-factor energy efficiency under the metafrontier framework", Energy Policy 142 , 111498, 2020

      27 Meeusen , W.van den Broeck , J ., "Efficiency estimation from Cobb- Douglas production functions with composed error", International economic review , 435-444, 1977

      28 B. J.KimJ. W., "An Analysis of the Economy of Scale for Domestic On-site Hydrogen Fueling Stations", Journal of Energy Engineering16 ( 4 ) , 170-180, 2007

      29 Russell , R., "Theoretical productivity indices . In The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis", 2018

      30 Jin , Q.Kerstens , K.Van de WoestyneI., "Metafrontier productivity indices : Questioning the common convexification strategy", European Journal of Operational Research 283 ( 2 ) , 737-747, 2020

      31 ParkC. I.SeoH. J., "The Efficiency and Productivity Change in the National R & D Projects of 6T Sectors", Journal of Industrial Economics and Business31 ( 1 ) , 293-325, 2018

      32 Afsharian , M. , PodinovskiV. V., "A linear programming approach to efficiency evaluation in nonconvex metatechnologies", European Journal of Operational Research 268 ( 1 ) , 268-280, 2018

      33 Lee , H.Choi , Y.Seo , H., "Comparative analysis of the R & D investment performance of Korean local governments", Technological Forecasting and Social Change 157 , 120073, 2020

      34 J. I.NadiriM. I., "Product demand , cost of production , spillovers , and the social rate of return to R", D ( No . w3625 ) . National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991

      35 Jung , W.Kim , H.Cho , S., "An Empirical Analysis on the Spillover Effects of R & D Investment in the ICT industry", Knowledge Management Research 20 ( 1 ) , 27-43, 2019

      36 Wang , Q. , ChiuY. H.Chiu , C. R., "Non-radial metafrontier approach to identify carbon emission performance and intensity", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews69 , 664-672, 2017

      37 Griliches , Z., "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth", Bell Journal of Economics10 ( 1 ) , 92-116, 1979

      38 Lee , W.S. , Hyun , S.J.Kim , B.H., "Research on government R & D program efficiency indicator development and application plan", Science & Technology Policy Institute, 2011

      39 n-Esteve , M.V. , Picazo-TadeoA. J., "Environmental productivity in the European Union : A global Luenberger-metafrontier approach", Science of The Total Environment692 , 136-146, 2019

      40 R. , GrosskopfS. , NorrisM.Zhang , Z ., "Productivity growth , technical progress , and efficiency change in industrialized countries", The American economic review , 66-83, 1994

      41 van Elk , R.ter WeelB.van der WielK. , Wouterse , B., "Estimating the returns to public R & D investments : Evidence from production function models", De Economist 167 ( 1 ) , 45-87, 2019

      42 R. , GrosskopfS. , LindgrenB.Roos , P., "Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980 1989 : A non-parametric Malmquist ? approach", Journal of productivity Analysis 3 ( 1 ) , 85-101, 1992

      43 Inglesi-Lotz , R., "Social rate of return to R & D on various energy technologies : Where should we invest more ?", A study of G7 countries . Energy Policy 101 , 521-525, 2017

      44 D. W.ChristensenL. R.DiewertW. E., "The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input , output , and productivity", Econometrica : Journal of the Econometric Society , 1393-1414, 1982

      45 Sala-Garrido , R.Molinos-Senante , M.ndez-Sancho , F., "Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model", Chemical Engineering Journal173 ( 3 ) , 766-772, 2011

      46 Thieme , C.Prior , D.Tortosa-Ausina , E., "A multilevel decomposition of school performance using robust nonparametric frontier techniques", Economics of Education Review 32 , 104-121, 2013

      47 Kristensen , T. , OlsenK. R.Kilsmark , J.LauridsenJ. T.PedersenK. M., "Economies of scale and scope in the Danish hospital sector prior to radical restructuring plans", Health Policy 106 ( 2 ) , 120-126, 2012

      48 Lee , B.Sohn , E.Won , D.Yeo , W.Kim , K.Kim , S., "The efficiency analysis of national R & D planning for the field of precision medicine in korea", Journal of Open Innovation : TechnologyMarket , and Complexity 4 ( 3 ) , 39, 2018

      49 J. L.YangC. H.ChenC. P.D efficiency, "the national innovation system : An international comparison using the distance function approach", Bulletin of Economic Research66 ( 1 ) , 55-71, 2014

      50 K. F.HamzahN. M.YuM. M., "Metafrontier Efficiency Analysis for Hospital Pharmacy Services Using Dynamic Network DEA Framework", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences , 101044, 2021

      51 Baek , I.Chen , M.Lee , H., "A Study on Efficiency Analysis for Major International Airports in Korea , China and Japan Using DEA", Korea Logistics Review 30 ( 3 ) , 23-31, 2020

      52 Lang , G., "Measuring the returns of R & D An empirical ? study of the German manufacturing sector over 45 years", Research Policy 38 ( 9 ) , 1438-1445, 2009

      53 Corderi , D. , LinC. Y. C., "Measuring the social rate of return to R & D in coal , petroleum and nuclear manufacturing : A study", 2011

      54 Schmidt , P. , LovellC. K., "Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost frontiers", Journal of econometrics9 ( 3 ) , 343-366, 1979

      55 G. E.CoelliT. J., "A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data", Empirical economics20 ( 2 ) , 325-332, 1992

      56 ParkS. J.KimK. H.JeongS. K., "The study on the analysis of efficiency of governmental R & D programs regarding to the S & T outcomes", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society14 ( 2 ) , 205-222, 2011

      57 Badinger HEgger P., "Intra- and inter-industry productivity spillovers in OECD manufacturing : a spatial econometric perspective", CESifo working paper No . 281, 2008

      58 Jang , H.Lee , S.Suh , E., "A comparative analysis of the change in R & D efficiency : A case of R & D leaders in the technology industry", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 28 ( 8 ) , 886-900, 2016

      59 Nemoto , J.Furumatsu , N., "Scale and scope economies of Japanese private universities revisited with an input distance function approach", Journal of Productivity Analysis41 ( 2 ) , 213-226, 2014

      60 G. E.CoelliT. J., "Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data", Journal of econometrics38 ( 3 ) , 387-399, 1988

      61 O ’ DonnellC. J., "Productivity and Efficiency Analysis : An economic approach to measuring and explaining managerial performance", Springer Singapore, 2018

      62 Shamohammadi , M. , OhD. H., "Measuring the efficiency changes of private universities of Korea : A two-stage network data envelopment analysis", Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148 , 119730, 2019

      63 Sala-Garrido , R.Molinos-Senante , M.-Arce , M., "Comparing changes in productivity among private water companies integrating quality of service : a metafrontier approach", Journal of Cleaner Production216 , 597-606, 2019

      64 R. , GrosskopfS. , LindgrenB.Roos , P.W. CooperA. LewinL. Seiford, "Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals : a Malmquist output index approach . In A. CharnesData envelopment analysis", Theory , methodology , and applications ( pp . 253-272 ) . Springer , Dordrecht, 1995

      65 Mocholi-Arce , M.Sala-Garrido , R.Molinos-Senante , M.Maziotis , A., "Performance assessment of water companies : a metafrontier approach Accounting for quality of service and group heterogeneities", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 74 , 100948, 2021

      66 Eguchi , S.Takayabu , H.Lin , C., "Sources of inefficient power generation by coal-fired thermal power plants in China : A metafrontier DEA decomposition approach", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 110562, 2020

      67 He , B. , WangJ. , WangJ. , WangK., "The Impact of Government Competition on Regional R & D Efficiency : Does Legal Environment Matter in China ` s Innovation System ?", Sustainability 10 ( 12 ) , 4401, 2018

      68 Wang , H.Zhou , P.XieB. C.Zhang , N., "Assessing drivers of CO2 emissions in China ’ s electricity sector : A metafrontier production-theoretical decomposition analysis", European Journal of Operational Research 275 ( 3 ) , 1096-1107, 2019

      69 Carvalho , P. , MarquesR. C., "Computing economies of vertical integration , economies of scope and economies of scale using partial frontier nonparametric methods", European Journal of Operational Research 234 ( 1 ) , 292-307, 2014

      70 ChoT. Y.ChenY. S., "The impact of financial technology on China ` s banking industry : An application of the metafrontier cost Malmquist productivity index", The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 101414, 2021

      71 Park , R., "An Empirical Comparison and Verification Study on the Seaport Clustering Measurement Using Meta-Frontier DEA and Integer Programming Models", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association33 ( 2 ) , 53-82, 2017

      72 Lee , C.Cho , K., "Efficiency analysis and strategic portfolio model of national health technology R & D program using DEA : focused on translational research", Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers 40 ( 2 ) , 172-183, 2014

      73 YangD. H., "Analysis on RTS and the Change of Productivity Efficiency of Public General Hospitals in Vietnam using Parametric and Non-Parametric Approach", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 15 ( 2 ) , 767-776, 2014

      74 Arora , N. , TalwarS. J., "Modelling efficiency in budget allocations for Indian states using window based non-radial non-concave metafrontier data envelopment analysis", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 70 ( C, 2020

      75 Latruffe , L.Fogarasi , J.Desjeux , Y., "Efficiency , productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe : The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France", Economic Systems 36 ( 2 ) , 264-278, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼