RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      韓國의 貿易金融政策方向에 關한 硏究 : 現行 輸出支援金融을 中心으로 = (A) Study on the Course of Korean Trade Fanancing Policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T723017

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        부산 : 慶星大學校 貿易大學院, 1988

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 경성대학교 무역대학원 , 무역학과 , 1989. 2

      • 발행연도

        1988

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        326.26 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        382.63 판사항(21)

      • 발행국(도시)

        부산

      • 형태사항

        80p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 74-76

      • 소장기관
        • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립부경대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 동국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울시립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Korean trade financing policy is closely related to the system of export support financing.
      Therefore this paper considered the distinctive featurer the present situation, and the problem of Korean trade financing policy through the phenomenal analysis laying stress on the present system of export support financing, and studied the future-oriented course of Korean trade financing policy for the continuous enlargement of export and the improvement of national economy. Generally the distinctive feature of Korean trade is to be the dual cycle structure between export industry and internal trade-oriented industry. This became the source of monopolistic capital profit.
      In 1950's the distinctive feature of Korean trade financing policy was the inefficiency and the lack of independence under the influence of foreign assistance.
      Because of concentrating on the arrangement necessary for receipt of foreign assistance, economic life of the populace was stiffened. The preferential treatment of large enterprises and the sacrifice of agricultural fields were forced.
      Thereafter these have affected the character of Korean trade policy. In 1960's the distinctive feature of Korean trade was the intial stage of international division of labor exporting it into advanced countries like a the United Stated to process the parts or half-finished products importing from Japan.
      At that time the main export industry was the texitile industry. In 1970's Korean trade shifted from the export of the texitile products to the export of the heavy chemical industrial products. As a result the character rearing the large enterprise was reinforced in Korean trade financing policy.
      In the large enterprise the preferential treatment was given by the special financing support for export industry, the import financing of the main raw materials, the export financing, the simplification of the ex post facto control, and so forth.
      But the enlargement of trade liberalization was a serious blow to the middle and small petty enterprise.
      In this changing process of Korean trade the export support financing of our country has deepened the dual structure of trade because of the preferential support for the large enterprise, that is, the foreign capital enterprise.
      Particularly the enterprise of our country which had a lack of funds and a low productive capacity has assumed the trade pattern depending on the loan and the direct investment of foreign enterprise. Our export support financing has played the role supporting this present situation indirectly.
      As a result the foreign dependency of the national economy was deepened, and the insolvent enterprise was appeared by the bankruptcy of the middle and small enterprise and the collusion of the large enterprise with the international capital.
      What is worse, the negative effect,-that is, the adhesion of politics and economics, the estrangement of consuming public, the ruin of adoriginal capital, the decline of volition for technical development, and so forth-was appeared.
      Accordingly the course of new trade financing policy of our country is as follows.
      First, for the balanced development between the export industry and the internal trade-oriented industry the dual cycle structure of Korean trade should be improved by the structural improvement of exchange rate policy and bank-rate policy.
      Secondly, for the Diversification of export structure and the establishment of self-supporting economy structure the export support system for the middle and small enterprise should be rein forced.
      Lastly, for the settlement of the foreign dependency the Korean trade structure the territory of national economy should be expanded through the closer connection between the internal structures of vertical and horizontal division of labor.
      번역하기

      Korean trade financing policy is closely related to the system of export support financing. Therefore this paper considered the distinctive featurer the present situation, and the problem of Korean trade financing policy through the phenomenal analys...

      Korean trade financing policy is closely related to the system of export support financing.
      Therefore this paper considered the distinctive featurer the present situation, and the problem of Korean trade financing policy through the phenomenal analysis laying stress on the present system of export support financing, and studied the future-oriented course of Korean trade financing policy for the continuous enlargement of export and the improvement of national economy. Generally the distinctive feature of Korean trade is to be the dual cycle structure between export industry and internal trade-oriented industry. This became the source of monopolistic capital profit.
      In 1950's the distinctive feature of Korean trade financing policy was the inefficiency and the lack of independence under the influence of foreign assistance.
      Because of concentrating on the arrangement necessary for receipt of foreign assistance, economic life of the populace was stiffened. The preferential treatment of large enterprises and the sacrifice of agricultural fields were forced.
      Thereafter these have affected the character of Korean trade policy. In 1960's the distinctive feature of Korean trade was the intial stage of international division of labor exporting it into advanced countries like a the United Stated to process the parts or half-finished products importing from Japan.
      At that time the main export industry was the texitile industry. In 1970's Korean trade shifted from the export of the texitile products to the export of the heavy chemical industrial products. As a result the character rearing the large enterprise was reinforced in Korean trade financing policy.
      In the large enterprise the preferential treatment was given by the special financing support for export industry, the import financing of the main raw materials, the export financing, the simplification of the ex post facto control, and so forth.
      But the enlargement of trade liberalization was a serious blow to the middle and small petty enterprise.
      In this changing process of Korean trade the export support financing of our country has deepened the dual structure of trade because of the preferential support for the large enterprise, that is, the foreign capital enterprise.
      Particularly the enterprise of our country which had a lack of funds and a low productive capacity has assumed the trade pattern depending on the loan and the direct investment of foreign enterprise. Our export support financing has played the role supporting this present situation indirectly.
      As a result the foreign dependency of the national economy was deepened, and the insolvent enterprise was appeared by the bankruptcy of the middle and small enterprise and the collusion of the large enterprise with the international capital.
      What is worse, the negative effect,-that is, the adhesion of politics and economics, the estrangement of consuming public, the ruin of adoriginal capital, the decline of volition for technical development, and so forth-was appeared.
      Accordingly the course of new trade financing policy of our country is as follows.
      First, for the balanced development between the export industry and the internal trade-oriented industry the dual cycle structure of Korean trade should be improved by the structural improvement of exchange rate policy and bank-rate policy.
      Secondly, for the Diversification of export structure and the establishment of self-supporting economy structure the export support system for the middle and small enterprise should be rein forced.
      Lastly, for the settlement of the foreign dependency the Korean trade structure the territory of national economy should be expanded through the closer connection between the internal structures of vertical and horizontal division of labor.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 目次 = 1
      • Ⅰ. 序 = 5
      • 1. 硏究의 目的 = 5
      • 2. 硏究의 方法 = 7
      • 3. 硏究의 範圍 및 內容 = 7
      • 目次 = 1
      • Ⅰ. 序 = 5
      • 1. 硏究의 目的 = 5
      • 2. 硏究의 方法 = 7
      • 3. 硏究의 範圍 및 內容 = 7
      • Ⅱ. 韓國 貿易金融政策의 一般的 特徵 = 10
      • 1. 韓國資易의 二重的 循還構造 = 10
      • 1) 수출경제의 순환구조 = 10
      • 2) 循還構造의 歪曲 = 12
      • 2. 韓國貿易金融政策의 展開過程 = 13
      • 1) 1950年代의 貿易金融政策 = 13
      • 2) 1960年代의 貿易金融政策 = 15
      • 3) 1970년대의 貿易金融政策 = 16
      • 4) 최근의 貿易金融政策 = 18
      • Ⅲ. 現行 韓國輸出支援金融制度의 現況 = 21
      • 1. 短期 金融 = 21
      • 1) 輸出支援金融 增加 推移 = 21
      • 2) 內國信用狀 開設 및 어음 買入實績 = 25
      • 3) 輸出換어음 買入 및 擔保貸出 = 26
      • 2. 中 · 長期 金融 = 27
      • 1) 延拂輸出 金融 = 27
      • 2) 外貸貸出 = 29
      • 3) 輸出産業 設備資金 = 34
      • 3. 輸出支援金融의 特徵 = 35
      • Ⅳ. 韓國의 貿易金融政策의 問題點 = 40
      • 1. 輸出第-主義 貿易金融政策의 歸結 = 40
      • 2. 支援政策上의 問題點 = 41
      • 1) 大企業 優待政策 = 41
      • 2) 輸出産業 過剩保護 支援政策 = 49
      • 3) 輸出産業의 獨占化 = 51
      • 4) 企業의 自生力 결여 = 53
      • Ⅴ. 새로운 貿易金融政策의 方向 = 56
      • 1. 韓國貿易의 二重的 循湯構造 解消 = 56
      • 2. 中小企業 輸出支援制度 强化 = 58
      • 3. 輸出支援金融制度의 政策方向 = 65
      • 1) 稼得額 中心의 選別支援 = 65
      • 2) 大企業과 中小企業의 均衡的 支據 = 65
      • 3) 中 · 長期輸出支援金融의 확대 = 66
      • Ⅵ. 結論 = 71
      • 〈 參考文獻 〉 = 74
      • Abstract = 77
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼