RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      중등학교 전통사상교육의 문제점과 과제 = The Problems and Tasks of Traditional Thought Education in Korean Education System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104048784

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Korean education system aims at the establishment of national identity and international perspective based on the tradition. However, it is still doubtful that the present educational environment is enough to fulfill the goal. Especially, we need to c...

      Korean education system aims at the establishment of national identity and international perspective based on the tradition. However, it is still doubtful that the present educational environment is enough to fulfill the goal. Especially, we need to consider the effectiveness of the present education of traditional thought which is fundamental for the national identity. This paper is to check the problem of the traditional thought education in Korea through analyzing the ethics textbook now in use. It is the other main point of this paper that the joint research between traditional philosophy major and education major is in crucial need, in order to write a textbook of traditional thought. Furthermore, it is very important point in this paper that intellectual tradition of Korean Confucianism should be the core of traditional thought education. This theory which is established by the group discussion for ages possesses the high rationality and logical compatibility. Intellectual tradition is a priceless property of Korea.
      It is vital to achieve high technology and technology-intensive industry, in order to develop Korean economy. Technology-intensive industry can be developed when the high scientific knowledge is supported. This high-tech industry, which is very brain intensive, enhances the industrial structure. Futurists proclaim that 21st century is the era of knowledge revolution. Knowledge creates the higher value added by integrating labor, capital, resource, technology in a new way. This enhanced industrial structure cannot be done by communalism, strict work ethic, and brilliant officers which were pointed as the primary factors of Korean economic development. There was intellectual tradition of Korean Confucianism working in depth to maximize intellectual ability. Meanwhile, we focused on normative aspect of Korean Confucianism. There is no question that the search for the principle of Korean Confucianism is the key challenges of it. Moreover, the intellectual achievement that Korean Confucianism made should get the spotlight again and be handed on to the next generation by education. In order to make one step forward to postmodern from modern, this process is very important. We cannot stay in a diagram that the west is rational and scientific, while the east is emotional and moral. We can find some great examples of critical thinking and logical writing in eastern intellectual tradition.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Korean education system aims at the establishment of national identity and international perspective based on the tradition. However, it is still doubtful that the present educational environment is enough to fulfill the goal. Especially, we need to c...

      Korean education system aims at the establishment of national identity and international perspective based on the tradition. However, it is still doubtful that the present educational environment is enough to fulfill the goal. Especially, we need to consider the effectiveness of the present education of traditional thought which is fundamental for the national identity. This paper is to check the problem of the traditional thought education in Korea through analyzing the ethics textbook now in use. It is the other main point of this paper that the joint research between traditional philosophy major and education major is in crucial need, in order to write a textbook of traditional thought. Furthermore, it is very important point in this paper that intellectual tradition of Korean Confucianism should be the core of traditional thought education. This theory which is established by the group discussion for ages possesses the high rationality and logical compatibility. Intellectual tradition is a priceless property of Korea.
      It is vital to achieve high technology and technology-intensive industry, in order to develop Korean economy. Technology-intensive industry can be developed when the high scientific knowledge is supported. This high-tech industry, which is very brain intensive, enhances the industrial structure. Futurists proclaim that 21st century is the era of knowledge revolution. Knowledge creates the higher value added by integrating labor, capital, resource, technology in a new way. This enhanced industrial structure cannot be done by communalism, strict work ethic, and brilliant officers which were pointed as the primary factors of Korean economic development. There was intellectual tradition of Korean Confucianism working in depth to maximize intellectual ability. Meanwhile, we focused on normative aspect of Korean Confucianism. There is no question that the search for the principle of Korean Confucianism is the key challenges of it. Moreover, the intellectual achievement that Korean Confucianism made should get the spotlight again and be handed on to the next generation by education. In order to make one step forward to postmodern from modern, this process is very important. We cannot stay in a diagram that the west is rational and scientific, while the east is emotional and moral. We can find some great examples of critical thinking and logical writing in eastern intellectual tradition.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍정근, "호락논쟁의 본질과 임성주의 철학사상" 한국연구원 2007

      2 정수복, "한국인의 문화적 문법" 생각의나무 2007

      3 "초등학교 6학년 1학기 『사회』"

      4 "중학교 『역사』"

      5 "중학교 2학년 『도덕』"

      6 정옥자, "조선후기 역사의 이해" 일지사 2003

      7 현상윤, "조선유학사" 민중서관 1970

      8 신춘호, "인물성동이논변의 도덕교육적 함의" (12) : 2007

      9 강재언, "선비의 나라 한국유학 2천년" 한길사 2003

      10 정창우, "새로운 도덕과 교육과정 시안에 대한 평가와 교과서 개발의 기본 방향" 2006

      1 홍정근, "호락논쟁의 본질과 임성주의 철학사상" 한국연구원 2007

      2 정수복, "한국인의 문화적 문법" 생각의나무 2007

      3 "초등학교 6학년 1학기 『사회』"

      4 "중학교 『역사』"

      5 "중학교 2학년 『도덕』"

      6 정옥자, "조선후기 역사의 이해" 일지사 2003

      7 현상윤, "조선유학사" 민중서관 1970

      8 신춘호, "인물성동이논변의 도덕교육적 함의" (12) : 2007

      9 강재언, "선비의 나라 한국유학 2천년" 한길사 2003

      10 정창우, "새로운 도덕과 교육과정 시안에 대한 평가와 교과서 개발의 기본 방향" 2006

      11 박종덕, "도덕교육에 있어서 습관의 위치: 사단칠정논변의 도덕교육적 한 해석" 6 : 2007

      12 조난심, "도덕과 교육과정 개선 방안 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2005

      13 윤호병, "다문화주의와 문화·글로컬리즘" 한국비교문학회 24 : 1999

      14 "교육법"

      15 "고등학교 『윤리와 사상』"

      16 이황, "退溪全書" 대동문화연구원 1971

      17 최영진, "南塘/巍巖 未發論辨의 再檢討 ― 退溪/高峯의 四端七情論爭과 對比하여 ―" 한국동양철학회 29 (29): 49-91, 2008

      18 최영진, "儒敎 國家論에 있어 統治 主體와 客體의 問題" 동양철학연구회 53 (53): 143-176, 2008

      19 "「도덕과 교육과정」, <교육인적자원부 고시 제 2007-79> 별책 6."

      20 박영철, "「‘금융위기의 진앙’ 월가를 다녀와서」 『조선일보』 2008년 10월 11일자, C5면"

      21 이종우, "19, 20시세기 한국성리학의 심성논쟁" 심산 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.55 0.49
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.47 0.972 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼