Annual Report Readability, Firm Performance, and Earnings Management

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper investigates the association between annual report readability and firm performance and earnings management. The readability of annual reports is measured with four proxies including Gunning fog index, Korean language index, accounting fog index, and word count index where the high indexes of readability show lower readability except for Korean language index. When firm performance is measured with loss firm, earnings, and negative earnings change, loss firm and earnings are negatively associated with readability. This result indicates that firms with higher earnings tend to provide easy readable annual reports. Then, in the test of the association between readability and earnings management which is measured with three proxies including accrual earnings management, absolute accrual earnings management, and real earnings management, absolute earnings management and real earnings management have a significant and negative association with accounting fog index. The negative association of absolute earnings management indicates that the firms with larger earnings management are likely to provide easy readable annual reports. The negative association of real earnings management indicates that the firms with positive real earnings management are likely to provide easy readable annual reports. Overall, the results support the obfuscation theory that when firm performance is poor or earnings management is carrying out negatively, firms are likely to provide less readable annual reports.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Moffitt, K., "What does that mean? investigating obfuscation and readability cues ad indicators of deception in Fraudulent financial reports" 2009

2 Gunning. R., "The technique of clear writing" McGraw－Hill 1952

3 Bloomfield, R., "The incomplete revelation hypothesis: Implications for financial reporting" 16 (16): 233-244, 2002

4 DeFond, M., "Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings" 23 : 115-139, 1997

5 Jones, M. J., "Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence－a comment to contextualize" 9 (9): 86-91, 1996

6 Watts, R., "Positive Accounting Theory" Prentice Hall 1986

7 Kieso, D. E., "Intermediate Accounting" John Wiley & Sons 2011

8 Burgstahler, D., "Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses" 24 : 99-126, 1997

9 Roychowdhury, S., "Earnings management through real activities manipulation" 42 : 335-370, 2006

10 Jones, J., "Earnings management during import relief investigation" 29 : 193-228, 1991

11 Lo, K., "Earnings management and annual report readability" 63 : 1-25, 2017

12 Cho, Y., "Development of Korean language readability formula for matching readers to texts" Graduate School of Korea National University of Education 2016

13 Dechow, P. M., "Detecting earnings management" 70 (70): 193-225, 1995

14 Schipper, K., "Commentary on earnings management" 3 : 91-102, 1989

15 Klare, G. R., "Assessing readability" 10 (10): 63-102, 1974

16 Li, F., "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence" 45 : 221-247, 2008

17 Courtis, J. K., "Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis" 11 (11): 459-472, 1998

18 Healy, P., "A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting" 13 : 365-384, 1999