지방자치단체의 국정참여제도에 대한 현황 및 제언 - 정부 정책에 대한 지방자치단체의 참여 방안을 중심으로 - = Current Status and Suggestions for Local Governments’ Participation System in National Policy- Focusing on Local Governments’ Participation in Government Policies -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Local autonomy involves the vertical decentralization of administrative authority between the central government and local governments, allowing for self-governance at regional levels. The ideology of local autonomy inherently includes decentralization. Within a decentralized power structure, the central government engages with local governments, and local governments actively participate in the national policy-making process. This mutual system of checks and balances between the state and local governments allows for the integration and harmonization of national interests with local diversity and specificity, thereby promoting efficient national administration.
With the growing need for local governments to participate in national governance and the promotion of decentralization and local autonomy policies that have been pursued over the years, the perception of local governments as partners in national governance has been strengthened. Since the implementation of the National and Local Government Cooperation Council in 2022, the status of local governments has been significantly elevated compared to the past. In this era, local governments and central ministries must cooperate equally in both national and local policies.
Various individual laws now provide mechanisms for local governments to participate in national policy processes. Regarding their involvement in the policy-making process within the executive branch, there are multiple avenues for participation, including the National and Local Government Cooperation Council, the Central Administrative Agency-Local Government Policy Council, the Administrative Coordination Committee, as well as proposals to the government, pre-consultations on autonomy and decentralization under the Local Autonomy Act, and participation in the formulation of various plans under individual laws.
However, most of these systems do not legally bind the heads of central administrative agencies to the opinions submitted by local governments, nor do they provide enforceable means for implementing the deliberations and recommendations of meetings. They only prescribe a general obligation for active cooperation. In other words, these mechanisms for local government participation in national governance remain at the level of merely gathering opinions.
To address the various issues with these systems, the following improvements are proposed. First, the procedures for submitting agendas to the National and Local Government Cooperation Council should be revised, and criteria for agenda submission should be established. Second, the number of local government-recommended members in government committees should be increased and specified in legislation. Third, deadlines for implementing the results of deliberations from the National and Local Government Cooperation Council, responding to government policy proposals, and handling submitted opinions should be clearly defined. Fourth, the parties involved in the pre-consultation system for autonomy and decentralization should be changed from the heads of central administrative agencies and the Minister of the Interior and Safety to the heads of central administrative agencies and local governments.
In conclusion, only when these mechanisms for Local Governments’ Participation System in National Policy are supplemented and improved to become effective systems will they function properly as means for realizing decentralization and local autonomy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김하열, "헌법강의" 박영사 2024

2 김상태, "행정협의조정위원회에 관한 법리적 고찰" 7 (7): 2007

3 "행정안전부 홍보 및 보도자료"

4 김남철, "행정법강론" 박영사 2019

5 이기우, "지방정부의 국정참여 : 독일의 사례를 중심으로" 29 : 1999

6 문상덕, "지방자치와 법치주의-분권적 법치국가시스템을 지향하며-" 24 : 2003

7 김성호, "지방자치단체의 국가정책결정 참여방안" 한국지방행정연구원 1997

8 김남철, "지방자치단체 국정참여의 공법적 과제-상원 또는 지방원 도입에 관한 논의를 중심으로-" 10 (10): 2010

9 김남철, "지방자치단체 국정 참여" 2010

10 김수연, "중앙지방협력회의의 통치구조상 의미와 한계" 24 (24): 2023

11 하혜영, "중앙지방협력회의 주요 내용과 향후 과제"

12 김영수, "중앙정부의 정책결정과정에 있어서 지방자치단체의 참여방안 연구" 6 (6): 2002

13 금창호, "자치분권 영향평가제도 도입방안 연구" 한국지방행정연구원 2019

14 하혜수, "자치분권 실현을 위한 지방자치단체의 국정 참여" 국회입법조사처 2018

15 김희진, "자치분권 사전협의의 주요 내용과 향후 과제"

16 윤석진, "자치법규의 현황·문제점, 정비지원체계와 그 개선방안 연구-자치법규선진화를 위한 정비지원 등 방안-" 한국법제연구원 2011

17 홍정선, "신지방자치법" 박영사 2022

18 행정자치부, "민선 지방자치 10년 평가(Ⅰ)" 2005

19 "대한민국시도지사협의회 내부자료"

20 뉴데일리, "김학홍 행정부지사, 제4회 중앙지방정책협의회 참석"

21 최철호, "국가와 지방자치단체의 관계정립 및 협력을 위한 지방자치법의 개정과 공법적 평가" 20 (20): 2020

22 Ludwig Macher, "Der Grundsatz des gemeindefreundlichen Verhaltens Zur Aktualisierung der Garantie der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung(Art. 28 II GG)" Duncker & Humblot 1971