RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      A Study on Developing Methodology of Evaluating an Accessibility of Home Appliances

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99930442

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Concerns about the quality of life and accessibility for people with disability have surfaced as a serious issue from early 2000 in Korea. Although, the laws has been established as a result, they are biased to information technologies and architectur...

      Concerns about the quality of life and accessibility for people with disability have surfaced as a serious issue from early 2000 in Korea. Although, the laws has been established as a result, they are biased to information technologies and architectures. It rarely concerns about house appliances for everyday use. Therefore, the countermeasure that evaluates the level of accessibility of house appliances is urgently required. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to offer accessibility checklist, which can be used as a specific guidelines to improve the accessibility of home appliances, and to derive the quantitative score for service providers and designers. The laws relevant to accessibility and guidelines for the disabled are used to the evaluation items in checklist. However, the checklist have limitation that can"t address the level of accessibility in quantitative way. The AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and QFD(Quality Function Deployment) methods are used to give weight on each group in checklist. This method can show the actual level of accessibility of house appliances. Moreover, service providers and product designers can inspect the level of accessibility of their product by themselves.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Method
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Conclusion
      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Method
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Conclusion
      • References
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼